Wikipedia:Featured article review/Layla/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by User:Dana boomer 17:01, 9 February 2013‎ [1].

Layla

Review commentary

Notified: Y2kcrazyjoker4, Deltabeignet, SummerPhD

There is uncited information about living people in this article, even if BLP may not apply to this song. Other non-BLP information needs references. George Ho (talk) 04:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Littered with tags, not sure if YouTube can be a RS, inconsistent citing. --Rs chen 7754 02:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Youtube is no longer reliable~~, but, if not copyvio, can be legitimate external link~~. --George Ho (talk) 03:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Turns out that instrumental, orchestral versions were performed in 1980. I tried to find albums released in 1980s, but no luck. Only ones are recent years, like 1997 and 2010s(?). --George Ho (talk) 05:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And there are two bare urls that need completing. Chris857 (talk) 04:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Formatted bare URLs into citation formats by using templates. --George Ho (talk) 05:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on it. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 13:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There are no BLP issues because that information is included in Boyd's autobiography. I made a quick search and found a lot of sources. I removed one rather off-topic comment in the first section. The only issue are the missing pages for some books. I will try to find a solution for that. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 13:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Improvements were made. Still, Youtube is used, and I can't find reliable sources that determine existence of live orchestral performances. --George Ho (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary

Featured article criteria mentioned in the review section include sourcing and BLP concerns. Dana boomer (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delist - Per its sourcing issues. GamerPro64 04:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per sourcing and BLP concerns. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist unless some quick and serious improvements are made regarding:
- Peacock wording, e.g. "an unmistakable guitar figure" and "famously contrasting movements", just in the first paragraph.
- Lack of citations, particularly in the legacy section and chart performance table. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:52, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Dana boomer (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.