Wikipedia:Featured article review/Isan/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by User:Joelr31 22:24, 13 January 2009 [1].
Review commentary
[edit]- Notifications: Henry Fowler, Thimoss, WP Southeast Asia, WP Thailand
1c -- poorly referenced (or, more precisely, unreferenced). Colchicum (talk) 22:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Woh, when you said "poorly referenced", you weren't kidding. Many, many more inline citations required in this article before it can pass 1c of the FA Criteria. Terrakyte (talk) 17:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been over two weeks since the FAR started, and I can see no evidence that the 1c issue has been worked on since that time. Therefore, I suggest move to FARC commentary. Terrakyte (talk) 14:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yeah, we really need a speedy delist for FAs that are this bad. Almost no inline sources at all. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Missing In-line citations a big issue, Move immediately to FARC, a candidate for speedy delist. --Redtigerxyz Talk 05:38, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concern is citations. Joelito (talk) 16:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist One sentence is cited. There are two footnotes, and one of them is a deadlink. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist With only two footnotes, one of which is a deadlink, there is absolutely no way this can remain an FA-status article. Terrakyte (talk) 22:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Per Terrakyte (talk · contribs), and YellowMonkey (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 23:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait Can I have a few days to poke around for sources? Maxim(talk) 02:09, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I believe this FARC commentary will stay open to January 4, at least, as FARC commentaries tend to last 2 weeks. If the article is going strong on the way to FA-quality, then the commentary will probably be extended. Terrakyte (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Follow up: I have been constrained by a lack of time, and I'm having trouble finding reliable sources to back up the article. Maxim(talk) 17:36, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Maxim are you done with your changes? Will you time to further work on this article? Joelito (talk) 02:00, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe that so much work is required atm to get this article up to FA-class, that we should just de-list now, and hopefully it can be brought up to FA-class at a later point. I probably seem like I am calling quits early to some people, but I just feel the workload is too great. Terrakyte (talk) 17:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.