Wikipedia:Featured article review/Hurricane Gloria/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 1:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Hurricane Noah, Fieari, Spangineer, Verrai, Titoxd, Hurricanehink, Dylan620, WikiProject New York City, WikiProject Pennsylvania, WikiProject United States, WikiProject Tropical cyclones, diff for talk page notification (2021-12-01)
Review section
[edit]The issues raised initially in the article talk page were inadequate coverage and (in)consistent source formatting. There have been edits since, but it's not yet marked as "satisfactory" in WP:URFA/2020A. Furthermore, I've yet to see edits mostly addressing or resolving the issues. George Ho (talk) 02:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I will have a look and see what I can do with Gloria in the next few days, as I play with Hurricane Nora....Jason Rees (talk) 16:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- If the intent is to work towards a save, a CCI check will be needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I have been looking at Gloria over the last few days and there is just too much missing for me to try and work it in the limited time I have. As for the CCI check, I believe that most of the sources are taken from NOAA and are thus in the public domain but may need attribution.Jason Rees (talk) 23:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes .. but the CCI check involves also looking for WP:CWW, which is quite time consuming! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I have been looking at Gloria over the last few days and there is just too much missing for me to try and work it in the limited time I have. As for the CCI check, I believe that most of the sources are taken from NOAA and are thus in the public domain but may need attribution.Jason Rees (talk) 23:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- If the intent is to work towards a save, a CCI check will be needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC per Jason Rees feedback. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - No new significant edits so far yet. --George Ho (talk) 08:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no significant edits yet to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 01:14, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per the discussion here and the related concerns that have come up at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Hurricane Nora (1997)/archive1. It looks like many of these older hurricane FAs are going to require significant work. Hog Farm Talk 18:26, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, it will take too much work and it's not happening. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:35, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Only 6 edits last year, no one is interested in saving this. Desertarun (talk) 15:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist few edits to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 15:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.