Wikipedia:Featured article review/ASCII/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 11:47, 10 May 2008.

ASCII

Review commentary

Notifications at Chris Chittleborough, WP Writing systems and WP Computing. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A brilliant prose promotion, this article is due for a tuneup. It has taken on cruftiness (External link farm, See also farm, lots of external jumps in the text) and is largely uncited. Several one- and two-sentence sections, and listiness. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was on my plate for a rewrite in the next few months, including a nav template for character encodings. "RFC" is a special wiki code like PMID. Gimmetrow 04:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the article has accumulated some cruft over the years (but it would be much, much worse without Gimmetrow's great work). Gimmetrow, I'm delighted to hear you're planning a rewrite, and I'd love to help in any way I can. Cheers, CWC 09:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary

Suggested FA criteria concerns are formatting (2) and referencing (1c). Marskell (talk) 19:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan (talk) 08:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per 1c. Of course, if work is happening, I will withdraw this. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I see extensive, if minor, changes Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:48, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Holding. Gimme has indicated he wants to work. Marskell (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Status Any updates on this? I see little activity on this article. Joelito (talk) 00:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. I also see little activity, and few references added, over the past six weeks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 01:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The only specific issues pointed out, external link and see also farm, has been corrected. Some sourcing added, and we don't really need cleanup tags. So sure, remove it. Gimmetrow 01:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I added a tag to the "ASCII control characters" section. This refers to the chunk of text (six or seven paragraph) that has been added at some point during this FAR, and is as such the biggest single change, but which is absolutely unsourced. I've just spent some time looking through the diffs, and see that this was your addition on 26 April, so hopefully can be fixed soon. NB looking at Control character didn't really help out, as that's a fairly unsourced article, too. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 02:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the entirety of that diff, my good sir. I didn't add it. Gimmetrow 02:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK. It doesn't matter who added it, though... I did spend a while trying to figure out when and where it was added. The point is that it's been added, and perhaps adds complications rather than resolves them. This is not a topic know much about, so don't know if the solution would simply be to cut the new material? --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 02:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So that was a structural change. Anyhow, I give up going through the diffs. There does seem to be a problem there. No? --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 02:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the section includes a lot of random observations, but most of them are verifiable. If the whole goal is to up the citation count, that can be arranged. But that's just lipstick on a pig in my opinion. The article doesn't include much of the content I would like to see, such as why the ASCII standard is structured how it is. That takes time. This was going to be one of my "June-August" projects, then it appeared at FAR. Gimmetrow 02:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How would you rather proceed? Holding the FAR open until June-August would seem a stretch. I defer to Marskell. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 03:16, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "reference" removed [1] was not really a reference, but a note originally added [2] as an inline link. It doesn't link to a source giving the IPA pronunciation, but a .wav. Not really essential, but it's the same as the .ogg files in Rabindranath Tagore. Gimmetrow 02:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Though it was doubling as a reference, to Miriam Webster, which was somewhat confusing. Is there really a great deal of uncertainty about the word's pronunciation? --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 03:16, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see this is now closed as remove, despite ongoing work to the article. Thank you so much. Gimmetrow 18:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.