Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Z. Marcas/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted by Karanacs 21:36, 20 October 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Scartol • Tok 23:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I have plowed through more than twenty volumes about Balzac (criticism and biography) to produce this erstwhile article about an 1840 novelette by Honoré de Balzac. It has been kindly peer reviewed by Awadewit and Figureskatingfan, and also reviewed here by Moni3. Although the Legacy section is a bit thin, it is my firm belief that there exist no other sources (in English, at least) that could expand it.
Thanks in advance for reviews and feedback! Scartol • Tok 23:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image review - All images check out. Awadewit (talk) 09:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support (Note: I recently peer-reviewed this.) This is a well-researched and well-written article about a lesser-known Balzac work. Considering what else is available on the internet regarding this work in a quick search, Scartol has provided a very valuable service in assembling this information, particularly in such an engaging way. Thanks for your dedication to the Balzac project! Awadewit (talk) 09:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I recently commented on the article's talk page per Scartol's request. My questions and suggestions were met. Well done, as usual. --Moni3 (talk) 13:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Provisional support:Support- (updated) Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:23, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think the article needs more work by way of clarification. I have added some detailed comments on the lead on the article's talk page. Will add more later. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:55, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've replied and repaired many of the items on the article talk page (and responded to others). Thanks for the careful eye to detail! Scartol • Tok 14:27, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.