Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Momčilo Đujić/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 30 July 2021 [1].

---

Momčilo Đujić

Nominator(s): Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Momčilo Đujić is the fourth WWII Chetnik leader I've brought to FAC, and the first one who was also a priest. A member of the interwar Chetnik Association, which largely functioned as a paramilitary arm of the Serb-dominated Yugoslav government, Đujić escaped the initial onslaught of the Ustaše after the Axis invasion of the country and the establishment of the so-called Independent State of Croatia, but returned during the general uprising to take charge of a large proportion of the Chetniks in the Dalmatian hinterland. He collaborated extensively with the Italians and then the Germans against the communist-led Partisans, and withdrew west alongside the Germans at the end of the war, surrendering to the western Allies. He was able to emigrate to the US, where he lived among the diaspora. He played a bit supporting part during the Yugoslav Wars and died in 1999. Have at it. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:59, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Image review

• Images appear to be freely licensed
• I rescaled and moved around some images for MOS compliance
• Dinara Division section is too long for ideal readability, I would try to put in subsections. (t · c) buidhe 08:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Buidhe, did a bit of a restructure! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Support from Vacant0

• I gave this a read, and everything seems to look fine, although I noticed Šešelj later became the leader of the Serbian Radical Party, a government coalition partner of Serbian President Slobodan Milosević, so Milosević should be changed to Milošević. Besides that, everything looks fine. Good luck! --Vacant0 (talk) 14:19, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Vacant0! Fixed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments Support from Tomobe03

• In the lede, when I read ...Đujić escaped to the Italian occupation zone and... I though he escaped from German to Italian occupation zone (either Zone II or III). From the corresponding prose in the body, I understood he fled to Kistanje, but that would be Zone I annexed by Italy on 18 May 1941.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Quite right, Tomobe03. Fixed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

G'day Tomobe03, do you feel you could do a source review for this one? It would be good to have someone who knows the range of sources available for these things to have a look. Guidance on source reviews at FAC is here in case you're not familiar with it. Let me know? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

I'll be happy to - later on today (CET).--Tomobe03 (talk) 08:26, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, Tomobe03, someone else has stepped in, but I'd be interested in your views on their queries about Glas javnosti in 2000 and E-novine in 2010 as regards their reliability for what is being cited to them. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• There is a street in Zemun recently named after Đujić: Apparently former "Prvomajska" was renamed recently. I cannot determine when accurately, but according to this [2] 21 March 2021 article there was talk of such change, and according to this [3] 7 July 2021 article it has been renamed. (The latter also carries info on Dragutin Keserović you might find useful elsewhere, but that's not relevant for this review.) Perhaps this could be mentioned in the article?--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
• Actually, I tried to find more reliable sources to confirm that the change has actually went through, but found none. Could be because it happened a couple of weeks ago and was kept low key, or could be that danas.rs was too quick to call it. I'm leaving the judgment entirely to you then if this warrants inclusion now or possibly later on.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  • There's a Glas Slavonije article [4] which also says that the street was renamed. Idk if it's an RS tho. OakMapping (talk) 22:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
    • I think the Danas article is enough. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Partial sources review

• Regarding the Glas javnosti source - is the passage meant to stress that there was a commemoration that year specifically (2000) or that there were/are commemorations in Serbia at all? Would it be noteworthy that there was one such event for example in 2012?--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
• As regards reliability of the Glas javnosti source, I'm not entirely convinced I'd use it - maybe to determine timelines and similar non-controversial aspects. Specifically, I tried to find any information about its editorial board or founders in the About Us section, but found no mention except vague reference to "numerous organisations". On the other hand the cited story regarding commemoration offers no value judgments, so I would think it is non-controversial enough to be acceptable.
• Regardless of the above, the Glas javnosti article is actually an announcement inviting people to attend - not a text describing what happened.
• As an aside, there is a reliable source that such a commemoration took place in 2012 [5].--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
• For some reason, the e-novine source will not open for me - seems dead. However, it appears that there is the same article (at least the title and the author are the same and it fully supports the prose currently referenced to e-novine) available at [6] Novosti. I'd say that source is quite acceptable.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

This great stuff, Tomobe03. Thanks. I'll start adding this material to the article tomorrow (and will add a bits related to other Chetnik leaders to their articles). It is hard to keep up with the wholesale revisionism going on in Serbia regarding WWII. I agree re: Glas javnosti, I think is is uncontroversial and it is ok to use it for what it is being used to cite. I will also swap out E-novine for Novosti, it is definitely better quality. Cheers again, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome PM. Happy to support.--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Support from Gog the Mild

Recusing to review.

• The lead seems overlong to me. Parts are a bit wordy and seem to go into unnecessary detail. Obviously this is subjective, but you may want to see if you could trim it.
• Maybe link "warlord"?
• " He was also active in promoting workers' rights, and was briefly jailed for leading a protest by railroad workers. He was also a member of the exclusively-Serb Agrarian Union political party." " He was also ... He was also ..."

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

• "a policy of widespread incarcerations, massacres, forced emigration, and murder of Serbs". The comma after "emigration" causes me to read this as meaning that only the "murder" applies specifically to the Serbs, while the other policies were applied more generally. Is this what is meant?

Fixed I think. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

• "and even captured Drvar" → 'and even captured the town of Drvar'.

Fixed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

• "as a Chetnik vojvoda." Use English or include an English explanation in line.

OK, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

• "having been raised listening to the gusle". 1. Foreign words which are not proper nouns should use lang templates, not italics. 2. This is the English Wikipedia, very few readers are going to know what gusle means. MOS:FORCELINK: "as far as possible do not force a reader to use that link to understand the sentence."

Fair enough, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

• "The reconstruction of the church bells, which had been destroyed by Austro-Hungarian artillery in 1916". I am not how something which has been "destroyed" can be reconstructed, which implies repair of a damaged object.

Good point, the better translation of lijevanjem is "casting". Changed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

• The second paragraph of "Interwar Chetnik Association" goes into unnecessary detail. Actually the whole section could do with rewriting in summary style.

I will look at this in the next day or so, but see my comment below. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

• "Hungary and Romania joined the Tripartite Pact". An in line explanation of "the Tripartite Pact", or rephrasing to a more general usage?

Fair enough, substituted Axis powers, and explained the Pact. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

• "World War II" also seems far from summary style to me.

Same. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

PM, I am stopping for now. I am teetering on the edge of opposing over "going into unnecessary detail" and not using summary style. Rereading and given your comments I withdraw this. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

I would appreciate your feedback on this. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

I am surprised on a couple of levels, Gog. I have addressed the substantive points above. I don't accept that there is a significant amount of "unnecessary detail" in the article, and think that saying that something is "wordy" without providing a few examples isn't helpful guidance. In my view the article is comprehensive, and included all the important things that need to be recorded about Đujić in an encyclopaedia. Just the other day a TFA of mine was criticised by a very experienced editor because in their view it didn't have much information on the life of the subject outside of his war service, so it is clear that views vary about what constitutes "unnecessary detail" in biographies varies across the board. The background and situation of WWII Chetniks was highly complex, few readers will know any background information about such an obscure topic, and his initially wildly swinging allegiances and eventual involvement with the Chetnik movement between the wars is important background to his later actions. I would also observe that summary articles on the important themes in this article are in a poor state, and being too focussed on summary style and relying on parent or see also articles to fill in gaps is not useful to the reader given that situation. Perhaps one day it could be cut down when those articles are of better quality, but right now it is what it is. I will have a go at trimming, but I really don't accept the criticism of "unnecessary detail" is justified on the whole. I must also observe that your "leaning oppose" has most likely dissuaded other reviewers, and making coordinator notes about pending closure when you have recused to review and noted that you are "leaning oppose" is also really inappropriate, and I strongly suggest you stop that practice if you have done it before. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

• We have reviewed a number of each others articles and have been pretty much on the same page. I anticipated your seeing what I was getting at readily. Not necessarily agreeing, but seeing it. I am certainly in agreement that an article should be complete in itself and not rely on others to bring a reader up to speed. I shall go through again, bearing in mind as much as I can your comments on comprehensiveness, and come up with some specifics which we could perhaps discuss the relevance of.

• Link "warlord"? I also note that it is used in the article and not the main article.

Added to the body cited to Binder, and linked both. The voivoda article does mention warlord (because that article is about this sort of vojvoda), but the Vojvoda (Serbia and Yugoslavia) article doesn't, because it was also a formal military rank/appointment in Serbia/Yugoslavia. Neither article is very well cited, unfortunately, and the former virtually ignores Chetnik vojvodas. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "This consisted of World War I-era Royal Serbian Army battledress and a black lambswool cap known as a šubara, with skull and crossbones insignia." This seems to me to be unnecessary detail.

OK, I thought it added "colour". trimmed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "His embrace of the Chetnik movement gave the impression he was (sic)". Maybe "His" → 'Đujić', and the end of the sentence seems to have gone walkabout.

Unformed thought which was replaced by the summary of his politics at the end of the Interwar... section. Deleted. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "In particular, he criticised Niko Novaković-Longo, a deputy from Knin and minister without portfolio in Milan Stojadinović's government." Unnecessary detail? The previous sentence seems to summarise the main points.

OK, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "According to police records". Unnecessary?

OK, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "which was attended by a crowd of over 800 people." Would probably fit better straight after first mention of the rally.

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "He later received financial compensation" Is it known when. Even roughly - weeks, years, decades?

The source doesn't specify, but I suspect pretty soon after. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "The historians Popović, Lolić and Latas observe that while Đujić's espoused political views appear to be wildly inconsistent during the interwar period, they ascribe this to his willingness to do anything to achieve power and wealth". Optional: → 'The historians Popović, Lolić and Latas observe that Đujić's espoused political views appear to be wildly inconsistent during the interwar period, but they ascribe this to his willingness to do anything to achieve power and wealth'?

Sure, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "closing the ring around Yugoslavia". As there was a border with Greece, is this strictly true?

Well spotted, tweaked. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "With the aim of securing his southern flank for the pending attack on the Soviet Union". Optional: "for" → 'before'.

Sure, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "the instrument that constituted the Axis, after some delay". Should the comma be a spaced en dash?

Sure, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "and was in Strmica with his family when the Axis invasion began." Unnecessary detail?

OK, trimmed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "On 13 July, the Ustaše had ordered the arrest". Why the change of tense? Suggest deleting "had".

OK, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "was recruiting them for the Chetnik cause". Optional: 'among them', or 'from them'.

Went with the former. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "had contacted the Italians", Again maybe remove "had"?

This is because it isn't clear when they did it, only that they had done it by early summer. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "with a goal of the". Just checking that this was a goal, and not the goal.

a pretty major one, but a one goal. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "between the Chetniks and Italians". 'the Italians?

added. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "The Chetniks were given 100,000 kuna", Is there some way of communicating in line that kuna was a currency? Maybe something like 'The Chetniks were financed with 100,000 kuna'?

Good point, added. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "although these relationships were "based only on their common fear of the Partisans" and "characterised by distrust and uncertainty"." MOS:QUOTE says "The source must be named in article text if the quotation is an opinion". Emphasis in the original.

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "The Germans had intercepted his radio communications with Mihailović in September, rendering them ineffective." I don't understand how the first part of the sentence caused the second.

Some context has been lost there, rewrote this. See what you think? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "obituary following his death". Possibly the last three words are unnecessary?

Oh yes, deleted. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "written by the journalist David Binder, wrote that". "written by ... wrote that".

Rewrote this. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• Why is "Vojvoda Momčilo Đujić Dinara Chetnik Movement" in quote marks?

Removed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• "The former Serbian basketball player". It may be worth mentioning that he played in the US as well as - or instead of? - Serbia.

Added a bit, not sure about the punctuation there, check? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Gog the Mild (talk) 20:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

I haven't addressed all of your comments above, as this somehow dropped off my to do list - for which apologies - and I have been racing to get the main review completed before being off line for four days. Taking into account your comments and rereading it seems likely that I will be supporting this comprehensive account. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for continuing the review, Gog the Mild, I think I've addressed all your comments. See what you think? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

That is all good.

• There are a few duplinks.
• Refs: there seem to be some stray brackets at the end of Popović.

Gog the Mild (talk) 13:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

All done, thanks very much Gog! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Coordinator comment

Over a month in and only one general support. Unless this shows signs of a consensus to promote developing over the next two or three days I am afraid that it is liable to be archived. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:47, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments Support by Indy beetle

• Infobox military person Allegiance parameter is supposed to denote who the person served with/for during their "years of service". His affiliation with the Chetnik Association either counts towards this or does not. In other words, we shouldn't be saying in the infobox that he had allegiance to a group in 1935 when he wasn't in "active service" until 1941.

Have tweaked this. What do you think? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• He was the oldest of five children born to Rade Đujić and his wife Ljubica (née Miloš)...The couple went on to have three sons and two daughters over a 16-year period. This seems to be a little redundant and could be consolidated into one sentence.

Good point, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• Đujić and his family were relatively wealthy by the standards of Depression-era Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Is this due to his wife's wealthy origins?

I suspect this was the case, but while Popović et al could be read to imply this, they do not state this explicitly. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• Đujić's reputation was such that he was chosen to stand by Alexander's coffin reads somewhat flowery without any further explanation. Simply mentioning that he accompanied the coffin should suffice.

Sure, it was about his status in the town, but that is pretty clearly implied even after the trim. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• "I knew that the country would not survive", Đujić explained, "because nobody can put Serbs and Croats in the same bag" Quotes should be followed by a citation, even if it's the same one as the next sentence.

Well spotted, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• Is Chetnik Association worthy of its own redlink?

Possibly, but the best link at present is Chetniks in the interwar period, which I've added. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• his statements ranged from right-wing royalism to left-wing progressive Since royal --> royalism, perhaps progressive --> progressivism?

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:49, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• Đujić's repeated calls for democracy and national rights You've mentioned that he varied his speeches, but this line seems in direct contrast to statements about his flirtations with royalism and quasi-fascism. What kind of democracy and rights was he calling for (exclusively for the Serbs, I imagine)?

His political views during this period are subjected to some analysis in Popović et al, I've tried to add some more in a final para in this section to clarify what they say his motives were. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:49, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• Đujić led a massive strike between Bihać and Knin in which more than 10,000 disenchanted railroad workers participated Excise "disenchanted". It's rather obvious they were displeased, otherwise they would not be striking.

Fair enough, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• He later received financial compensation from the Yugoslav government for the time he spent in prison What caused them to backpedal, fear of Dujic's popularity?

The source doesn't say, but I added the reason why he received the compo. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• The coup enraged Hitler, who declared: "even if Yugoslavia at first should give declarations of loyalty, she must be considered as a foe and therefore must be destroyed as quickly as possible." He then ordered the invasion of Yugoslavia, which commenced on 6 April 1941. Hitler's quote seems unnecessary here, the regular text conveys what context is needed.

Sure, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

• In August, once a general uprising against the Ustaše had begun, Is there an article for this revolt?

Linked Drvar uprising. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

-Indy beetle (talk) 22:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

• They were given 100,000 kuna Who is "they"?

The Chetniks, added. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

• It's not exactly clear why Dujic briefly chose to cast his lot with the Italians as they surrendered while opposing the Germans and seemingly have little to no sympathy for the Allied cause. Sunk cost fallacy, or did he think he could use what remained of the Italians to shore up the Chetniks?

Not sure what you mean here Indy beetle. He aligned with the Italians from August 1941 onwards. Two years later he was still working with the Italians (despite the fact the Germans had opposed this relationship throughout), and quickly switched to the less enthusiastic Germans after the Italians threw in the towel. By September 1943 he was pretty desperate to hang on. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• Is his condemnation of Slobodan Milošević due to Serbian war crimes committed during the Yugoslav Wars tarnishing Serbia's reputation, or due to Milosevic's coalition with a leftist party?

Because Milosevic was the leader of the Socialist Party of Serbia, which Đujić considered communist. And because he considered Milošević to be Tito's successor and that he had compromised Serbian national rights. I have tried to clarify this. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• The photo of him speaking at an event in Canada in 1991 raises the question, was he an active speaker to Serb expat communities during this time? Would reliable sources support such a statement?

Not quite that, but I've added a sentence about him being active in the diaspora and the church in North America. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

-Indy beetle (talk) 22:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

G'day Indy beetle, I've had a crack at addressing your comments. One point needs clarification. What do you think? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Support on prose. -Indy beetle (talk) 16:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Support by Pendright

@Peacemaker67: I can start in a day or two? Pendright (talk) 21:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

That would be awesome mate. I should have addressed all the other comments by then, so you won't be in danger of doubling up. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Start - Pendright (talk) 02:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC) Lead:

• Momčilo Đujić (Serbian Cyrillic: Момчилo Ђујић, Serbo-Croatian pronunciation: [mǒmtʃiːlo dʑûːjitɕ]; 27 February 1907 – 11 September 1999) was a Serbian Orthodox priest and Chetnik warlord (Serbo-Croatian: vojvoda, војвода)[. He] who led a significant proportion of the Chetniks within the northern Dalmatia and western Bosnia regions of the Independent State of Croatia (NDH), a fascist puppet state created from parts of the occupied Kingdom of Yugoslavia during World War II.

Consider bteaking this long sentence into two along the lines suggested above?

Fair enough, I was trying to shoehorn all his basis for notability in one sentence, but it really was a bit much. Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• In this role he collaborated extensively with first the Italian and then the German occupying forces against the communist-led Partisan insurgency.

Think about droppig first

Sure, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)*Đujić was ordained as a priest in 1933 and gained a reputation as something of a firebrand in the pulpit.

Change in to on

I don't think that is right, People are generally described as being in a role, not on one. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

<<>> My sugewstion was based on this: In is a preposition, commonly used to show a situation when something is enclosed or surrounded by something else. On refers to a preposition that expresses a situation when something is positioned above something else. Your call! Pendright (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• Following [After] the assassination of King Alexander of Yugoslavia the following year, he joined the Chetnik Association of Kosta Pećanac [the next year], forming several bands in the Knin region of Dalmatia.

Consider these suggested changes

Instead I just went with the year. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• These [and other Chetnik Association, bands, along with the rest of the Chetnik Association, became a reactionary force used by the central government to oppress the populace.

Consider these suggested changes

Went with something similar. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• Active in promoting workers' rights, [Đujić] he was briefly jailed for leading a protest by railroad workers, and [he] was a member of the exclusively-Serb Agrarian Union political party.

Consider these changes

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• After the Axis invasion of Yugoslavia in April 1941, the Croatian Ustaše regime implemented a policy of widespread incarcerations, massacres, forced emigration and murder of Serbs and other groups, and [but] Đujić [managed to escaped to the coastal zone annexed by Italy and began recruiting Chetniks in a refugee camp.

Is this a detail you can live without?

Partially done, the recruiting is sort of central to his involvement with the Italians. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• Once [When the] a general uprising began in August, [Đujić] he returned to Knin and employed his Chetniks to defend local Serbs from the Ustaše, and [he] even captured the town of Drvar in the Bosanska Krajina.

Consider the above changes

Did something similar. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• By mid-1942, Đujić was even encouraging his Chetniks to co-operate with NDH forces, and in early 1943, he attempted to participate on the Axis side in the Case White campaign against the Partisans, but this was blocked by the Germans.

Conaider the above suggested changes

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• In August, the Dinara Division suffered significantly at the hands of the Partisans[,] and through desertion, and by the time of the Italian capitulation [in September] the following month, it was of little use for [to coninue] offensive operations.

Consider the above suggested changes

I consider the comma after an introductory date/month phrase helps clarity and indicates a pause, implemented other suggestions. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

<> By rule, short intro's do not require commas. Your Call! Pendright (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• Đujić was tried and convicted in absentia for war crimes by the new Yugoslav communist government, which found him guilty of mass murder, torture, rape, robbery, and forcible confinement, [and] as well as collaborating with the German[s] and Italians.

Consider the above suggested changes

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• He later stated that he regretted awarding the title to Šešelj on account [because] of his involvement with Slobodan Milošević and his Socialist Party.

Consider the above suggestede changes

Went with something similar. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• In 1998, Biljana Plavšić, then President of the Republika Srpska, presented Đujić with an honorary award.

Consider the above suggestedchang

see above. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Early life:

• In 1929, he began attending the Serbian Orthodox seminary in Sremski Karlovci, graduated in 1931 and was ordained a priest two years later.[3]

Sugest:

• Dropping the comma after 1929, it's a short intro

See above. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• Replace he with Đujić

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• Add "where he" before graduated

Ended up splitting the sentence and tweaked wording. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• On 9 January 1935, Đujić, with a carbine slung over his back, presided over a gathering of twenty newly-recruited Chetniks in the village of Sveti Štefan just north of Knin, together with gendarmerie Brigadni đeneral Ljubo Novaković and one of Pećanac's deputies who brought Chetnik and Sokol insignia from Belgrade.

• "just north of Knin," is supplemental information and is usually set off with commas?

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• "who brought [the symbolic] Chetnik and Sokol insignia

Not sure this is needed, and insignia implies symbolism. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Colaborations agreements:

• Commencing in April, the Ustaše implemented a policy of widespread incarcerations, massacres, forced emigration, and murder of Serbs within the territory they controlled.[25]

Consider adding a year after April

Sure, it is a new subsection. Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• While [the Italians] they generally stood by as the Ustaše committed atrocities, [they did] the Italians also [open] opened up the border crossings into the Governorate of Dalmatia [for] to Serbs fleeing the Ustaše.

Consider these changes

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

• In August, once a [Once the] general uprising against the Ustaše had begun [in August], Đujić went to the centre of the revolt in Drvar with another Chetnik leader and sought approval from the leadership of the uprising to take leadership of the rebellion in t

Consider the above changes

Partially done, I've gone with "a" rather than "the" as there were multiple uprisings all over the NDH. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

1942:

• By [the] summer [of] 1942, Đujić's Chetniks [had] were effectively [become] Italian auxiliaries, and [they] the Italians began providing Chetnik detachments with arms, ammunition and supplies.[40]

Consider the above changes

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

1943:

• The remainder began collaborating with the Germans as early as October, although it they did not number more than a few thousand.[62]

it ?

Doh. Deleted. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Retreat and surrender:

• Đujić said of the Dinara Division that it was "under Draža's command, but we received news and supplies for our struggle from Ljotić and [leader of the puppet government in occupied Serbia, Milan] Nedić. ... Nedić's couriers reached me in Dinara and mine reached him in Belgrade. He sent me military uniforms for the guardists of the Dinara Chetnik Division; he sent me ten million dinars to obtain for the fighters whatever was needed and whatever could be obtained."

Suggest a block quoteFi ished

quoted out. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

@Peacemaker67: An interesting piece on a complex man of the cloth. A few nitpickers that you may or may not agree with. Regards! Pendright (talk) 02:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your review, Pendright! You always value-add! See what you think of my responses? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Supporting - left you a couple of after thoughts to read <>. Regards! Pendright (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Cheers! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Query for the coordinators

@FAC coordinators: this one now has four supports and an image review, just waiting on a source review. Can I have dispensation for a fresh nom please? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry PM, but not until a source review has at least been started. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

OK. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 21:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

@FAC coordinators: can I take it I can go ahead now? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Yep, be right to go ahead now. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:00, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Source review — Pass

Notes

• You might change the title to "Citations". "Notes" makes me think of footnotes (e.g., Herbert Maryon § Notes)

Changed back to Footnotes, which is what I usually use. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• #4 — Is this a library catalogue entry? Anything better to cite? What about the book itself?

Yes it is a library catalogue entry. Replaced with book details from Worldcat. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• #6 — Only the year needed, not the day/month.

OK, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• #79, 81 — Ditto re: year/day/month. Pages/line numbers needed. Why are these sources being used? For instance, can the indictment be considered reliable? At least in the American context, indictments tend to comprise yet-to-be-proven allegations.

Replaced the first one with Lazić. For the second one, I think the issue is if he was the subject of the indictment, which he wasn't. Slobodan Milošević was on trial, and as we know he died before his trial was completed. In any case, the court wasn't going to make any findings about a minor detail such as this. It is identified as material given in evidence, so I don't see a problem with it. Added how much Babić said he gave and the page. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• #84–87 — Ditto re: year/day/month.

All done except Hoare, he published a book in the same year and this journal article needs a unique anchor. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

References

• Binder 1999 — The New York Times can be linked.

OK. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• Links can be archived.

I generally let the bots do that, or do it manually if I notice linkrot. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

I tried running InternetArchiveBot but it did not capture any of them. As Tomobe03 notes above, the E-novine source will not open and may be dead. Seems to be as good a reason as any to protect the others. --Usernameunique (talk) 12:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• Gudžević 2010 — What is e-Novine?

e-Novine is a now-inactive web portal for news and commentary based in Serbia. It wasn't the finest news site in the world, but it was OK. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• What is Glas javnosti?

It was a daily newspaper in Belgrade that is now an online news site. It is also OK. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• Names of publishers can be linked.

Sure, but not necessary for verification purposes. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• For the works with multiple authors, suggest using the "| name-list-style = amp" parameter.

Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• Wittes 1999 — The Washington Post can be linked.

OK. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

This version looked at. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Reckon I might have addressed your points, Usernameunique. Thanks very much for stepping in and doing this. See what you think? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Peacemaker67, Usernameunique, as prompted I had a look at Glas javnosti and e-novine refs, but I included my comments on the matter (plus one other issue) in my earlier comments above. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

G'day both of you. I have now added material from the news articles and opinion piece Tomobe03 found. I reckon this is good to go. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Yes, as far as I'm concerned.--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Peacemaker67, there are a few issues with the links. The e-Novine source (no longer used) went dead, and the link for Latas & Dželebdžić 1979 now links to an advertising page. Once you deal with that, I would also manually archive these ones, to avoid the same problem recurring: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. (The last three are more likely to last, but might as well protect them too.) --Usernameunique (talk) 05:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Usernameunique. Done, all except the glas-javnosti one, which is already from their archive, and I can't find a Wayback version of the article itself, only the archive index page. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Usernameunique ? Gog the Mild (talk) 13:24, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Looks good, Gog the Mild, I'm signed off. --Usernameunique (talk) 06:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 13:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.