Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lastovo/archive2

Self-nomination.Great article for such a small island. Luka Jačov 16:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object. Not very well referenced, missing footnotes (see Wikipedia:Footnotes), lead is too short, Trivia section is too short (needs merging into another section, maybe lead?). — Wackymacs 16:15, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Really great article, but not enough inline citation. Stuff like Legend has it that Catalan pirates attacked Korčula and sent a messenger to Lastovo to tell the islanders to surrender or they would be next. needs a citation. Agree with peer-review that it could do with an image on the right side of the lead. Would be willing to change my vote if these changes were implemented. - FrancisTyers 19:51, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Not a flawless article, but extremelly complete for an island like Lastovo. --GTubio 22:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Agree with Wackymacs; lead is too short, and article also needs a thorough copyedit. AndyZ 22:59, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object - Better than last time, but still falls short on references and citations. I don't know that it could be lengthened, and this isn't the center of my objection, but it seems like it could be longer. Economy is not covered. —Cuiviénen (Cuivië) 22:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
support with conditions. generally well organized and focussed. needs more active verbs. too much use of "is" and "was". also could use more references....minor point: isnt it spelled "dolomite"

Support --M. Pokrajac 23:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --millosh (talk (sr:)) 15:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong object good article but fails WP:V because there is only one ref and one inline citation. Also, as has been mentioned, the lead needs work (per WP:LEAD). Mikkerpikker ... 12:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object, ~~needs a map of the area. PD version of something like this~~, otherwise very nice article. --Duk 12:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object - Lead, Footnotes, References, as per above. Fieari 14:31, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object though it is fixable, with inline citations and more references, a longer lead and the removal of the trivia section. Tuf-Kat 16:52, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - good, but not great. See Bjørnøya (not featured, but also good) for some ideas: Climate? Flora and fauna? -- ALoan (Talk) 17:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Good but not great. --Ghirla | talk 13:38, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object per above - lead, footnotes, refs, trivia section. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:49, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --HolyRomanEmperor 16:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object POV problems in the history section. --Elephantus 20:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Definite POV problems in the history section. See main Lastovo discussion / talk page -- Uvouvo 23:05, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]