Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Alanya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted 00:38, 27 February 2008.
Self nomination Alanya has been a Good Article for more than a year, and since has received both a positive Good Article Review and a Peer Review. The page has become a focus of Alanya information on the internet, and even the municipal government page quotes from the information. Please address content specific comments to the Talk page. Patrick Ѻ 17:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. --jskellj - the nice devil 17:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
-
- Brískelly's userpage notes that the user is from the Italian wikipedia, with contribs. Don't know if that matters.--Patrick Ѻ 01:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, well-referenced. Cheers. Trance addict 03:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks good! Arnoutf (talk) 15:26, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not yet The story that Atatturk renamed the city on the basis of a telegraph error requires much better support than a website; and the sentence in which is stands is not English; it should read two years before. This is one example; doubtless there are others. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to note, if you look, the telegraph bit is from a book, Dünden Bugüne Alanya by Haşim Yetkin, the external link on the reference contains the particular excerpt. I don't know the book's availability, but I've changed the reference and phrasing to suit.--Patrick Ѻ 01:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Image:Alanya_combined_logo.png requires a fair use rationale.ЭLСОВВОLД talk 03:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good article. Thanks--Uannis (talk) 12:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note; please review WP:PUNC, logical punctuation on quotes, and ask Brighterorange (talk · contribs) to run his script to fix the faulty endashes. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment
- Could any more be added to the history section on the 17th-19th centuries?
Could the geography section include info on the geology and nearby cities?The last paragraph of the tourism section goes into too much detail about the 2006 tourist season.- Are there any
radio stations, motorways or train stations in the city? Epbr123 (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply] - The population table needs sourcing. What is the reason for the population surge over the past few decades? Epbr123 (talk) 19:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Status? Is Epbr123 satisfied? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, pls double check the external link checker (at the top of this page), some are iffy. SandyGeorgia (Talk)
- Good progress is being made and I have struck through the items I am now satisfied with. Also, please ensure each ref includes the publisher and publishing date. Epbr123 (talk) 23:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your suggestions!--Patrick Ѻ 15:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Status? Several days since last comment, where do things stand on Epbr's suggestions? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I acted upon the above suggestions, and feel the article has benefited from them. I appreciate any further final comments and observations.--Patrick Ѻ 18:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Are there any train stations in the city? Epbr123 (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There aren't trains in the province. This is stated in the Transportation section. I added a note with reference when this was raised.--Patrick Ѻ 22:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Are there any train stations in the city? Epbr123 (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I acted upon the above suggestions, and feel the article has benefited from them. I appreciate any further final comments and observations.--Patrick Ѻ 18:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Status? Several days since last comment, where do things stand on Epbr's suggestions? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your suggestions!--Patrick Ѻ 15:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Good progress is being made and I have struck through the items I am now satisfied with. Also, please ensure each ref includes the publisher and publishing date. Epbr123 (talk) 23:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, pls double check the external link checker (at the top of this page), some are iffy. SandyGeorgia (Talk)
- Status? Is Epbr123 satisfied? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- support 79.11.18.74 (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- IPs first edit. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.