Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2012 tour of She Has a Name/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Ian Rose 10:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
2012 tour of She Has a Name (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Neelix (talk) 19:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because, since the previous nomination, this article has undergone an independent copyedit by Guild of Copy Editors member Lfstevens. I believe that all of the concerns raised in the previous nomination have been addressed and the article now meets the featured article criteria. Neelix (talk) 19:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Quick reference comment Some references are missing some information. For example, reference 43 needs more information (e.g. the page, body, maybe volume, publisher, etc). Carefully check all references and complete them if something is missing. Also, remember that only newspapers and magazines should be italicized; I am seeing a television network italicized when it shouldn't. I will give you a full review today or this weekend. Regards. — ṘΛΧΣ21 21:48, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I have gone through the references and filled out the information for reference 43 and others. I have also unitalicized the citations for sources other than newspapers and magazines. Thank you for offering to do a full review. Neelix (talk) 02:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Good. I will go back here soon. Sorry for the wait. — ΛΧΣ21 17:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I have gone through the references and filled out the information for reference 43 and others. I have also unitalicized the citations for sources other than newspapers and magazines. Thank you for offering to do a full review. Neelix (talk) 02:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delegate comment -- Unfortunately this particular nom seems to have been a non-starter, so I'll be archiving it. Given so little comment, Neelix, I'd have no problem with you renominating in less than the usual two weeks, but my recommendation is to go through GAN and Peer Review first, which aside from anything else could help build up more interest in it before another run at FAC. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 13:46, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.