Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1981–82 Gillingham F.C. season/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by Gog the Mild via FACBot (talk) 20 September 2023 [1].

1981–82 Gillingham F.C. season

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After something like 20 successful FACs for seasons from the history of Gillingham F.C. I thought I would give people a bit of a rest. But I couldn't keep away forever :-) So here's the tale of another season in the history of the club, one in which one of their greatest ever players (and my absolute idol when I was 13 years old) made his debut after being (reportedly) swapped for a dozen tracksuits....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14

30-year old -- hyphen between year and old
teenager Gary Sutton had deputised for him since the game against Burnley after Hillyard suffered a groin strain. -- maybe consider this as a separate sentence.
Dean White, who scored twice against Portsmouth,[38] repeated the feat in the next game, a 2–1 win over Millwall,[41] which meant that Gillingham had equalled the club record of four consecutive Football League wins away from home and won five consecutive league games for the first time since the 1972–73 season;[42][43] he then scored the only goal in a 1–0 win over Swindon Town. -- same as above, perhaps this could be split as well.
who had only two goals to his name since September -- not sure if to his name is needed. I think it should be fine if we say he only had two goals since September.
- This would not be a valid way of expressing it in UK English - we would never say that a player simply "had two goals since September". I worded it like that to try and avoid saying "Kemp made his debut in place of Lee, who had only scored two goals since September, and scored...." I can't really think of a different way to express it...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks for clarifying (I'm always learning the variations in writing UK English from your work). Pseud 14 (talk) 13:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Pseud 14: TBF in this case this is probably very specifically down to UK English football vernacular :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Micky Adams replaced Andy Ford after Ford suffered a knee injury -- maybe the second mention of Ford could be replaced with after the latter suffered a knee injury
19-year old Tony Cascarino -- hyphen between year and old
Three days later Lee was named only as the -- comma after three days later
A goal-less draw at home to Southend -- other instances were written as goalless, except for this one
That's all from me. Excellent work as always on your series. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pseud 14: - many thanks for your review. All amended as you suggested other than one noted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - After further thought, I found a different way to reword point 4, which I think does work as the two instances of the word "score" are much further apart..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - Changes look good. Support on prose. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Steelkamp

I'll take a look at this. I will mainly focus on prose. Steelkamp (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Due to their continued involvement in the FA Cup". Do the sources support this?
- More sources added which confirm that at one time the team had more league games scheduled in January but that the dates were given over to FA Cup games -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can "6th", "7th", "9th", etc, be converted to "sixth", "seventh", "ninth", etc, as per MOS:SPELL09?
- Think I got them all..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very good article. These are all the comments I have. Steelkamp (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Steelkamp: - thanks for your review, all addressed! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support on prose. Steelkamp (talk) 04:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SC

Putting down a marker for now. - SchroCat (talk) 17:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SchroCat: - sorry to trouble you, just wondering if you still planned to review this article? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris, I certainly do. Work has taken a turn towards the manically busy over the last couple of weeks and I haven’t had time to do much of anything, but I should be here in the next day or so. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SchroCat: - no worries, hope you are able to keep your head above the torrents of stress and I look forward to your review when time allows...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just one comment from me. In "January–May", "the club's continued involvement in the FA Cup": Link to FA Cup. That's my lot. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 11:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @SchroCat: - good spot, thanks! Done!! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. - SchroCat (talk) 12:35, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image review - pass

Only three images

File:John Sitton (1995).jpg - extracted from CC 3.0-SA image w/ OTRS - okay
File:Tony Cascarino.jpg - extracted from CC 3.0-SA image by Wikipedian - okay
File:SteveBruceNorwich1980s.JPG - CC 3.0-SA image by Wikipedian - okay

All images are properly licensed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source review - pass

Sources are good quality - mostly newspaper articles and books. AGF on book references, which are not available to me.
Spot checks: 4, 38, 44, 78, 100, 117 - all okay
fn 119 points to 1982-83 season and not 1986-87 like it is supposed to.

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hawkeye7: - thanks for your review. Dumb-ass copy-paste error on ref 119 fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Co-ord query

@FAC coordinators: , I have another one nearly ready to go (just need to ref a couple of sentences). Given that this one has three prose supports plus completed source and image reviews, would I be permitted to nominate it? Thanks in advance :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And it has been up for 21 days, so sure. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.