Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:DJEW)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Judaism. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
|
|
Judaism topics
[edit]- Ash-Shatat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Based nearly entirely on unreliable sources, with no lasting significance or impact. nableezy - 17:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Israel and Lebanon. nableezy - 17:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Syria. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Article currently based on poor sources but there seem to be better ones out there.
- [1][2][3][4][5][6] BobFromBrockley (talk) 00:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think this far out news reports are primary sources. One of those seems fine though. nableezy - 13:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, media reviews/commentary are secondary regardless of temporal distance (which is mentioned at WP:PRIMARYNEWS). Sources above are good. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Those aren’t media reviews, they are news stories. nableezy - 14:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- They are commentary on the program and its existence, they're not merely "this program aired" they discuss it and its context. So I think it counts. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- There also seem to be a decent amount of mentions of this program in academic books, but most aren't very long admittedly, not passing but not extensive. However there are quite a few. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:22, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- They are commentary on the program and its existence, they're not merely "this program aired" they discuss it and its context. So I think it counts. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Those aren’t media reviews, they are news stories. nableezy - 14:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - in addition to the sources Bob mentioned, which are indeed secondary, there's significant coverage in books, articles, and government reports, mostly under "al-Shatat" rather than "ash-Shatat". A lot of it I don't have access to, but some public ones are [7] [8] [9] [10]. So I think it meets WP:GNG, the article certainly needs work though. — xDanielx T/C\R 23:12, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per xDanielx Andre🚐 01:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Thank you. The sources presented seem to allow to improve the page (which badly needs it) and show it's notable enough. Some contain only a brief amount of coverage on the fiction and a lot of context but all in all, I find there's enough, so opposed to deletion. -Mushy Yank. 03:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, History, Politics, Judaism, and Middle East. -Mushy Yank. 03:06, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep:The sources seem good enough to keep as a stub and to allow more work on this article to improve it rather than deleting. The subject is important and Wikipedia should try whenever possible to include articles that show the deeply ingrained antisemitism in the Arab world, as opposed to covering it up as if it doesn't exist. DaringDonna (talk) 20:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Miscellany for deletion
[edit]Proposed deletion
[edit]- Reverse Marranos (via WP:PROD on 7 November 2024)