Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Lipovans

Lipovans

Nominated on 22:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC); needs 6 votes by April 28,2006.

Very interesting ethnic group deserves to be more about it. European only rural Russian minority outside former Soviet Union.

Support:

Luka Jačov 22:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
estavisti 22:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
serbiana - talk 22:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
--Jovanvb 22:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
--Elephantus 22:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
RexNL 10:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
--GTubio 11:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SpeedyGonsales 14:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PANONIAN (talk) 14:29, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Filip (§) 15:46, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
--HolyRomanEmperor 16:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
— SasaStefanovic • 20:34 15-04-2006

--VKokielov 21:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-- Obradović Goran (ta^lk 13:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Avala 16:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

Very interesting ethnic group deserves to be more about it.

I'm not sure if this sentence means anything... --HolyRomanEmperor 16:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's Belgrade from AID (45 votes in one week) all over again! I don't think that's a bad thing -- we can all learn from such superior get-out-the-vote campaigns. -Scottwiki 08:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, as long as there's no competition - like here. Almost everywhere else -- in particular, on AfDs -- it looks like someone's been gathering votes, and everyone else listened. I'm concerned about the reputation of the community. --VKokielov 17:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination appears to be the winner. I believe that it should be posted as the current collaboration. (I'd post it myself -- but I've made newbie mistakes when doing such things recently.) -Scottwiki 14:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, heck, I'll do it. I'll make sure to follow the instructions. :-) -Scottwiki 04:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done. -Scottwiki 05:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The week is now half over and only two small changes have been made to this COTW. Why aren't the people who nominated it making improvements? --EncycloPetey 02:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is a fraud, of course. Because the nominator expects every other one of us to work, and none of us (of course) have any intention to work, since the nominator solicited our votes.

See [1]. --VKokielov 13:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]