Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DatBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

DatBot

Operator: DatGuy (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 18:04, Tuesday, September 13, 2016 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Converts WikiProject Belgrade to WikiProject Serbia/Belgrade task force

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot_requests#WikiProject_Belgrade_to_WikiProject_Serbia.2FBelgrade_task_force

Edit period(s): One time run, perhaps once every month if some people accidentally add {{WikiProject Belgrade}}

Estimated number of pages affected: 1316 transclusion(s) found from Template:WikiProject Belgrade

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No

Function details: Not much else to it, really. I've tested it already at User:DatBot/sandbox. I've worked a bit with @MusikAnimal and Samtar:, and they gave me a heads up.

Discussion

{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} I realise that this template should only be used after 7 days, but this is a fairly simple task. No real need for thorough testing or etc. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 13:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits or 5 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added to AWB manual mode list. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete., @Xaosflux: The first few edits had a small issue with the RegEx. All the edits since 17:57 should be all perfect. Contribs. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added to AWB automatic mode list. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for extended trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. OK, please re-run - automatic AWB mode has been enabled as well for this part of the trial. Please mark your edits as 'minor' as well. Also, please be sure not to use your bot account for discussions such as here: Special:Diff/739579102. It can be easy to mix up accounts during testing, one thing I usually do it open a second browser for any manual checking under the bot account (or a private browser instance). — xaosflux ^Talk 17:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete., @Xaosflux and Magioladitis: Contribs here, extremely sorry that most of the edits weren't tagged as minor. I loaded the wrong setting. I've also followed your recommendation on my talk page. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 17:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 05:26, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DatGuy on pages like Talk:List of Belgrade neighbourhoods and suburbs, you lowered the importance rating from High to Low ; on [[Talk:Belgrade Marathon] it went from Mid to Low; on Talk:Ada Ciganlija it went from Top to High. What logic are you using for dealing with this parameter? — xaosflux ^Talk 16:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: Extremely sorry for the 2 days wait, I had to re-work the entire code. The major think in the rework is some bugfixes and adding Belgrade-importance. On my sandbox, I'm doing different scenarios that I can think of. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 14:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the "expected" behavior for varying importance (inherit higher, lower, merge, etc) ? — xaosflux ^Talk 14:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: If the importance is the same, then it will replace "Belgrade" with Serbia and add |Belgrade=y|Belgrade-importance=what was the importance of WikiProject Belgrade, see [1]. If the importance is different, then it will add |Belgrade=y|Belgrade-importance=what was the importance of WikiProject Belgrade, see [2]. Not sure if that explains it clearly enough. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So if Serbia project has this as "TOP" importance, but Belgrade has it as "LOW" importance - they expect the article will now be "LOW" correct? — xaosflux ^Talk 14:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: No. The end result will be WikiProject Serbia|class=|importance=top|Belgrade=y|Belgrade-importance=low. Don't forget that there is a parameter for Belgrade-importance.

See [3]. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 14:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for extended trial (30 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - hopefully this will be the last one. — xaosflux ^Talk 11:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:11, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.