Talk:Ada Ciganlija

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Ada Ciganlija is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia: Belgrade High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Belgrade task force (marked as high-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Blokovi#Savski B;okovi|Savski Blokovi]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Name

This alternative claim of the island's name origin circulates as far as I can remember. I think that it should be mentioned here anyway, even though I don't think it is true. Much less verifiable things are posted on Wikipedia. Citation needed tag should also stay until someone provides the printed source of the claim. PajaBG 12:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place to put rumours. If you have a reliable source, such as a linguist/etymologist who said that, then you can readd it. bogdan 21:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rumour is one thing and theory another one. But ok, here are some sites to mention this variant too: Official City of Belgrade site, Official Ada Ciganlija site, Offical Universiade 2009 site. I repeat that personally I don't find this theory correct and that it even can be a racial thing (better to be named after the Celts than after the Gyspies) but if theory is frequently mentioned (here, where the island is, regardless of how frequently it is or it is not mentioned in Romania or USA, for example) it should be put in the article too PajaBG 00:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting Ada Ciganlija and Sava Lake

I propose to split Ada Ciganlija and Sava Lake. Lake is separate topic than island so it would be content split. Anybody against it?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:20, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ada Ciganlija. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090412151228/http://www.adaciganlija.rs:80/s_tereni/kupaliste.jsp to http://www.adaciganlija.rs/s_tereni/kupaliste.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]