Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BattyBot 69

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

BattyBot 69

New to bots on Wikipedia? Read these primers!

Approval process – How this discussion works
Overview/Policy – What bots are/What they can (or can't) do
Dictionary – Explains bot-related jargon

Operator: GoingBatty (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 03:50, Tuesday, December 13, 2022 (UTC)

Function overview: Fix |doi= parameters in citation templates

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser

Source code available: AWB

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Help:CS1 errors#bad doi

Edit period(s): Daily (as needed)

Estimated number of pages affected: Small number

Namespace(s): Mainspace and drafts

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Continuing my work to keep various CS1 error categories clean, this bot task would fix articles and drafts in Category:CS1 errors: DOI by removing https://doi.org/ or other domain name from the |doi= parameter of a citation template (e.g. this edit). The bot will also run general fixes at the same time. GoingBatty (talk) 03:50, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Approved for trial (25 edits or 1 week). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. – SD0001 (talk) 06:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll post my diffs here each day.

Dec 13: this edit. GoingBatty (talk) 18:18, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dec 14: this edit. GoingBatty (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dec 15: this edit. GoingBatty (talk) 05:54, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dec 16: this edit, this edit, and this edit. GoingBatty (talk) 03:29, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dec 17: this edit. GoingBatty (talk) 05:03, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dec 18: this edit and this edit. GoingBatty (talk) 04:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and this edit. GoingBatty (talk) 17:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dec 19: this edit. GoingBatty (talk) 02:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dec 20: this edit, this edit, and this edit. GoingBatty (talk) 13:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SD0001:

Trial complete. Here's a week's worth of edits for you to review. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 13:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{BAG assistance needed}} GoingBatty (talk) 18:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SD0001, I'm not seeing any errors, but on the other hand we're averaging two edits a day. I know I am a bit more conservative than most when it comes to "do we really need a bot for this" so I'll mull this over while I await your thoughts on the matter. Primefac (talk) 11:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. I'm not convinced this is necessary, but I guess every little bit helps. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.