Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BattyBot 51
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: GoingBatty (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 21:57, Sunday, January 24, 2016 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Remove hashbangs from Twitter URLs
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot requests#Cited tweets
Edit period(s): One time run, unless editors continue to add these to Wikipedia
Estimated number of pages affected: 2,803
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Change URLs of the form http://twitter.com/#!/foobar
to https://twitter.com/foobar
(with variations for URLs with https
and www.twitter.com
) GoingBatty (talk) 21:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
[edit]Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. If people are wondering why this is necessary, hashbang URLs do not work without JavaScript, so it is an accessibility concern. — Earwig talk 22:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Earwig: Trial complete. - see these edits. GoingBatty (talk) 23:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note you probably want to link to Fragment identifier (see "hash-bang" under "Proposals") instead of Hashbang; the latter is the UNIX shell concept. — Earwig talk 23:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. No other issues. — Earwig talk 00:11, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note you probably want to link to Fragment identifier (see "hash-bang" under "Proposals") instead of Hashbang; the latter is the UNIX shell concept. — Earwig talk 23:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.