Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Archives/Unsuccessful Nominations/October 2012
| Main page | Articles for improvement | Article nominations | Schedule | Assessment | Accomplishments | Automation & templates | Participants | Talk page |
This page lists the TAFI nominations that were closed as unsuccessful in October 2012.
The below nominations are closed as unsuccessful – the articles received no support other than from their respective nominators. Northamerica1000 (talk) 07:58, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- The following Today's Article for Improvement nomination is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Start-class article of a very important topic. Coin945 (talk) 10:43, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Very listy. Hasn't been changed in years. Sooo much that needs to be covered. Pretty much all its edit history for the past 3 or so years (probably more) is all reverting vandalism. Shame, because its a very important topic too.... :'( Coin945 (talk) 15:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
- I agree that much could be done, but by TAFI standards it's a reasonably well developed article. —WFC— FL wishlist 05:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Start-class core article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Nail (fastener) - as in the one you hit into a wall
Start-class core article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Start-class core article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
- By TAFI standards this is at a relatively advanced stage of development. —WFC— FL wishlist 05:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cereal is a start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes.Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes. (possibly a bit too close to my "entertainment" suggestion)Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Start-class vital articles. Lots of coverage holes. (child could be merge with childhood and preadolescence) Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
C class fundamental human concept. Pretty much only history is covered. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
It has some copyright violation issues and could easily be improved upon. Go Phightins! 20:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Oppose
- This is a very sensitive subject and we would be foolish to make this a troll magnet by pushing it front and center. An excellent example of what NOT to make a daily article for improvement... Carrite (talk) 04:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- The Today's Article for Improvement nomination above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.