User talk:Zyw333

Welcome!

Hello, Zyw333, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as International cultural diplomacy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International cultural diplomacy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International cultural diplomacy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jun Hong Lu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Captain Sweden 15:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "jun hong lu". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 June 2016.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 00:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning jun hong lu, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 10:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

June 2016

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jun Hong Lu, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been or will be reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i am not entirely sure why i can not have this minor edit , I am not trying to make a test edit i believe the formate before was bit confusing .Thanks Zyw333 (talk) 13:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zyw333. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Jun Hong Lu, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 01:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi libstar, thank you for your comment and advice , i think it is very unfair and less of consideration of doubting me have a close connection to jun hong lu or any connection may cause only based on my editing which are absolute netural. i am someone lives in England that is all I can and willing to disclosed to wikepedia. I am still quite confuse based on what you assused me having a close connection with jun hong lu. please inlight me ! All i could not agree less at the page editing was why what some of chinese,malysia local authorities thinks about jun hong lu is even matter at the first place, jun hong lu is austrilian and if the austrilia government does not do anything about his speech or his charity organisaiton, why others matter?? chinese does not approve democracy chinese does not approve gay marraige, does this make all the other comments against this conflict of interst ? there are really odd that people with different ip address and does not even have a gut to sign in actually posting more or less the same comment, should this not be something get your attetnion plz? Million thanks to your effort!!

it's very interesting that you seem to almost entirely focus on one article in Wikpedia , refer single purpose editor. I would strongly suggest you start editing a wider variety of articles. given the frenzy of editing of Lu's article , it has arisen suspicions that many of these single purpose editors may have a conflict of interest. you included. LibStar (talk) 01:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]