User talk:Zswapan

October 2020

The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kamal Chowdhury was changed by Zswapan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946464 on 2020-10-10T17:43:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kamal Chowdhury. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kamal Chowdhury, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 18:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:09, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zswapan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just trying to insert the poem named "You Don’t Even Know Earth" written by Poet Kamal Chowdhury which was published in the Daily Star. There is no point of Vandalism. I think, the computer system or robot has misunderstood by the title of the poem. Zswapan (talk) 18:27, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please assure us that you understand the problems with your recent edits, per the note below. – bradv🍁 23:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bradv: Yes, I got the point now. I was reading all the policy pages by now. I apologize the for unintentional mistake. Please consider my appeal to unblock me, so that I can contribute and enrich the wiki. I am extremely sorry, once again. Zswapan (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Chipping in here because I just found the edits in question via copypatrol. Zswapan, I believe that you were indeed acting in good faith, but I want to note that the material you were trying to add was copyrighted and therefore cannot be included in Wikipedia. You can read more about Wikipedia and copyright here. More generally, I want to note that Wikipedia is not a repository for creative works – regardless of their copyright status. Best, — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs: Thank you so much for the clarification. It helps. I should have used the reference link, instead of putting the full content. Zswapan (talk) 16:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Thanks for helping me out. I am extremely sorry. It is not intentional. I have got the point now. I was putting the same text over and over again, even after your warning. I have read the policy, and found the cause of disruptive editing. I will follow the guidelines. That page is not updated. Please allow me to enrich the page, along with the WikiPedia. Your support will be highly appreciated. Zswapan (talk) 17:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zswapan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I got the point now. I apologize the for unintentional mistake. Please consider my appeal to unblock me, so that I can contribute and enrich the wiki. I promise, this will not happen again. I am extremely sorry, once again. Zswapan (talk) 16:47, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please address the allegations of sockpuppeting, as described here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zswapan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Cabayi (talk) 19:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]