User talk:Zorya's Leshak/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Zorya's Leshak! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 23:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

UAA

Hello, Zorya's Leshak. You've made 15 reports to WP:UAA in about 45 minutes. However, many of the accounts you've reported have zero edits. In general, administrators tend to only block users with zero edits when their usernames are particularly terrible, such as when they are racist or extremely offensive. Usernames like "Someidiotguy", "Hdehdgedjeusheudeh", and "Sussyamongusgirl1200" do not fall into that category. Even where an account has an edit, most administrators only block when their edits are vandalism or show that they are not constructive editors. Please see the instructions at the top of the noticeboard.

As another tip, you reported a username containing a telephone number to that noticeboard. However, since such information needs to be suppressed, it is best to follow the instructions at requests for Oversight, so that less cleanup will need to be done. I hope this helps. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just came to say the same thing. Don't report accounts with no edits. Secretlondon (talk) 00:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Package redirection scam

I think you started this article ..... congratulations on it being moved to 'main space'. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! there was an account called "Rigid Boxes" that double-submitted the article and immediately got blocked. I think that account got the offical credit for it. Zorya's Leshak (talk) 05:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Zorya's Leshak

Thank you for creating Package redirection scam.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000 thanks. I deal with this scam often so know quite a bit about it. Zorya's Leshak (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lost in transit scam

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Lost in transit scam, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DIVINE 📪 16:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DIVINE

https://globalnews.ca/news/7652457/online-shopping-fraud-toronto/

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ex-worker-posted-exploding-parcels-in-amazon-fraud-bt3l9qk5g

Definitely not a hoax. Just not notable enough yet with 2 sources only. I could find more if you need, but I don't see how this is a "hoax". Zorya's Leshak (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Zorya's Leshak! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Adding audio versions of an article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Garbage feeding

Hello, Zorya's Leshak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Garbage feeding, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did a minor edit to the page --- which will reset the edit counter. Please see my suggestions on the articles talk page. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 23:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Triangulation fraud

Hello, Zorya's Leshak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Triangulation fraud, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:59, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination on User:RockettMovado/sandbox

Hello @Zorya's Leshak,

I noticed you nominated User:RockettMovado/sandbox for speedy deletion. While the what they were writing was slightly promotional, it was not nearly enough to warrant a speedy deletion. The page was a userspace draft, so they were trying to write an article there, where it wouldn't be deleted, instead of in the draft space.

Sandboxes are made for testing articles and other things. They also created it less than 2 hours ago, so it isn't going to be perfect yet.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to reach out. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, sorry for the inconvenience. I thought the links looked spammy, I won't tag those types of pages in the future. Zorya's Leshak (talk) 04:08, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All good! echidnaLives - talk - edits 13:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC) echidnaLives - talk - edits 13:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fedsmoker (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO - YouTube, Wikis, Dailydot and WeRemember.com are not reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fedsmoker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zorya's Leshak! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Draft:The Hour of Agony

Hello Zorya's Leshak. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:The Hour of Agony, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. BangJan1999 02:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]