User talk:Zochawk

Welcome!

Hello, Zochawk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Crystal Pite. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Schazjmd (talk) 17:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A note on using refs

Hi, and thanks for your efforts on Crystal Pite.

One thing that'll help a lot is knowing that you can define a ref once, name it, and then reuse it. This is done by writing something like <ref name="Ballet BC">{{cite web | ...}}</ref> for the definition, note the name; and then <ref name="Ballet BC"/> wherever you want to reuse the same ref, note the closing / which says "no definition follows, look elsewhere for that".

BTW you just over-wrote several of my refs... I guess you are using a text editor and then pasting the text to replace chunks of the article? That can be convenient, but it can lead to accidental reversion of recent changes. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:34, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are still uncited statements (paragraphs that don't end with a citation, for instance) in the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:42, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And punctuation always goes before refs, unspaced:

....... end.[1] --- correct

....... end [2]. --- wrong

Hope this helps. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Crystal Pite

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Crystal Pite you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Less formally, hi, welcome to Wikipedia, and good on you for going for a GA. The process is unbureaucratic and informal, and I'll do whatever I can to help you on your way, so feel free to ask me (or anyone else) for advice and assistance. The key thing that's missing is critical discussion in published books or academic articles about Pite, so a good place to start will be a library or bookshop. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:46, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! Thanks for the help with the article and going forward with the review.Zochawk (talk) 15:48, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you feel positive about it. It would be useful if you could respond on the GA review page, Talk:Crystal Pite/GA2, to indicate that we are making progress. The usual approach is to state under each item that it is done, as soon as you believe you have fixed that one, and I'll respond either by striking out that item or if need be by restating it more clearly. That works best for small items; on the larger ones, it may be best to make a brief statement of your intention and timescale, e.g. 'I intend to add some material from Doe 2017 to fix this by 25 August.' All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste page move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Wen Wei Wang a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:Wen Wei Wang. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --Mirokado (talk) 14:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your help! I am new to Wikipedia and still trying to make sense of how it works. If I understand what you are saying correctly, I should do this move action on the Draft:Wen Wei Wang page to the original page I created? I created the new draft page because I did not think I was able to publish the original page I created for whatever reason. I want to publish the page and do so correctly, can you help? Thanks! Zochawk (talk) 16:47, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I attempted to request a move for the page since it wouldn't let me do it myself since the page Draft: Wen Wei Wang already exists (because I created it). Now it is coming up with multiple errors and I am unable to request a move. Please help.Zochawk (talk) 16:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted deletion

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wen Wei Wang without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I deleted the page because I accidentally created two of the same page in an attempt to publish it. I created this original page that for some reason I was not able to publish and then copy and pasted the content into Draft:Wen Wei Wang which I have published for review with the same content. I am unable to merge or move this page into Draft:Wen Wei Wang so I thought to just delete it since it already exists.

Hello Zochawk and user:CLCStudent: we can sort this out! Probably the histmerge I left on the draft would have done the trick, I was thinking while doing some shopping since that a move request on the article would have been better, since there is no significant history on the current draft which would need to be maintained. I will add the move request and leave any other notes which seem necessary. --Mirokado (talk) 19:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It seems better to use the existing histmerge request (diff showing the updated request) where many moves from main to draft are handled, than to use a move request. Please let the administrator who handles that request do whatever seems appropriate before editing the files again. --Mirokado (talk) 19:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Anthony Appleyard has now moved the mainspace version to draft. You will need to hit the submit button on the AFC dialog at the top of the article to again submit it for review. I tweaked the section heading here so the related sections will get archived together if you ever enable that... --Mirokado (talk) 22:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all of your help, much appreciated! Zochawk (talk) 23:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Company 605 (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Company 605 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Company 605, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:20, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zochawk! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:20, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noam Gagnon (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noam Gagnon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noam Gagnon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Crystal Pite

The article Crystal Pite you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Crystal Pite for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wen Wei Dance (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zanhe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wen Wei Dance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wen Wei Dance, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zanhe (talk) 20:12, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wen Wei Wang has been accepted

Wen Wei Wang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 23:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Company 605 (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Willsome429 was:

Doesn't seem to fit the scope of the article - should be about the company, not its founders.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Company 605 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Company 605, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 14:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eponymous (company) (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Willsome429 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add more sources about the company and not about its clients.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eponymous (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eponymous (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:49, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Serge Bennathan (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Serge Bennathan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Serge Bennathan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noam Gagnon has been accepted

Noam Gagnon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DanceHouse (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I've read through all 44 references. While they serve to verify the information in the article, they do not help establish notability of the organisation. They are all either mere mentions of DanceHouse, or are announcements issues by DanceHouse, or in one case is a blog. For this article to be accepted into Wikipedia you'd need to add further references that show that other reliable, independent publications have written in depth about DanceHouse, not about performances. That could be for example a national newspaper journalist writing about the impact or influence that DanceHouse has had over the last 17 years.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DanceHouse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DanceHouse, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Eponymous (company) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eponymous (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Company 605 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Company 605, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Serge Bennathan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Serge Bennathan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eponymous (company)

Hello, Zochawk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eponymous".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:24, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Company 605

Hello, Zochawk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Company 605".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 08:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DanceHouse concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:DanceHouse, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DanceHouse

Hello, Zochawk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DanceHouse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 13:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wen Wei Dance

Hello, Zochawk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wen Wei Dance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:56, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Serge Bennathan

Hello, Zochawk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Serge Bennathan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]