User talk:Zjec

October 2012

Hello, I'm Evanh2008. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Stan Lee without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 21:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Fnlayson (talk) 18:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Musdan77 (talk) 19:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Seconded - At the moment your actions are damaging, whether it is your intention or not, the articles and templates related to the live action TV show and you are ignoring other editors. You can use the talk pages to try and get a consensus for your changes, but stop you unilateral editing. - J Greb (talk) 01:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

August 2013

I see other editors have had issues with you. Your edits at Blade (comics) violated WikiProject Comics guidelines regarding plot overdetails of animated-series episodes in character entries. And your uncited POV observations about the character violate Wikipedia policies of original-research synthesis and personal observation. By not going to the talk page to discuss these issues but summarily reverting even when told these are vios, you are engaging in edit-warring. Now please discuss your issue on the article's talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Zjec I have little interest in talking over my edits, I'm simply logical -- The previous comment was incorrectly signed by Zjec (talk) 14:02, 18 August 2013

Your enthusiasm is great. Please work with others and discuss your edits. Your pattern of adding redundant information, original conclusions, and unsourced statements, however true they might be, is disruptive, and your argumentative edit comments make you look like a possible trying to get blocked from Wikipedia. Wikipedia a community and we all work together to create this online encyclopedia. Thank you. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 05:40, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Zjec I admit I can be a little impulsive; but I just want to show people the truth. And last time I checked Wikipedia wasn't just a website, it's also an Encyclopedia; and encyclopedia's are supposed to be truthful and based on fact's.

Please slow down. You create extra and unnecessary work for others when you add excessive details, add redundant information, write incorrectly, and fail to follow Wikipedia's style guide. Here are a few tips: Refer to Wikipedia's Manual of Style to help you format correctly. In the reply you just posted, you used semi-colons incorrectly and put inappropriate apostrophes in plural words that should have been encyclopedias and facts. To sign your talk posts correctly, type ~ four times at the end of your message. Signing your username as Zjec at the start puts it in the wrong place, which will create confusion, and links it to nothing.

If you don't work with others, you are highly likely to get banned from Wikipedia. Looking back through your talk page history, I see that you have been warned about that before. Looking through your edit history, I see that many different people have been correcting your edits over the course of time. Please consider that some of them might know what they are doing. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 00:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Rick Stone (DC).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rick Stone (DC).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Not sure how to do that?

March 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Flash (1990 TV series), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

I need some help, I created a new page and the title is only supposed to say Daisy Watkins (DC Comics), but instead it says User:217.42.241.147/Daisy Watkins (DC Comics)

Fixed. In the future I'd recommend using the {{helpme}} template when you're in need of assistance. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 19:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Still not enough, now it says User:Daisy Watkins (DC Comics), its only supposed to say Daisy Watkins (DC Comics). I want it be an article.

Mea culpa; didn't realize it was still in userspace. Fixed. DonIago (talk) 20:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Minor edits

You need to stop marking almost all of your edits as minor because most of them are not minor. A minor edit only involves "superficial differences between the current and previous versions". Incorrectly marking your edits as minor can lead to a block if you do not correct your behavior. Thank you. Spidey104 14:45, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Continuing to incorrectly mark your edits as minor is disruptive editing and you can be blocked from editing if you do not stop. It is better to accidentally not mark a minor edit as minor than it is to accidentally mark an edit as minor when it is not.

This is a minor edit. However, this and this are not minor edits. Spidey104 18:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Peter Hooten

Hello, and thanks for creating this article. Just as an FYI, all new articles about living people must have at least one reference to a reliable source, or they can be deleted after a 7-day grace period. The article has not yet been tagged as such, but it is likely to be until a reference can be added. Just so you know! Electric Wombat (talk) 01:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

H.G. Peter

I've started a discussion regarding H.G. Peter at Talk:Wonder Woman#H.G. Peter.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hulk (comics). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Musdan77 (talk) 21:05, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

I request page protection because this is getting frustrating and tiresome Zjec 21:07, 14 November (UTC)

Hinata Hyuga

The article Hinata Hyuga has been merged back to the character list due to failing. WP: Notability. By that, I mean that the article lacked real world information into the form of a reception section commonly seen in other article such as Naruto Uzumaki, Jiraya (Naruto), etc. If you think Hinata can have a reception pratise in your sandbox and then bring it to a top section. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Jack Murdock (comics)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jack Murdock (comics), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.drunkgod.com/download-link-for-marvels-daredevil-season1-episode1/.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

There's nothing preventing you from recreating the article, you don't need my permission to do so. As long as the rewritten version is not a copyright violation as well then it won't be deleted for violating copyright. I'm afraid I can't restore the page as it was a copyright violation. Hut 8.5 00:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Edit warring at Daredevil (Marvel Comics)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Zjec reported by User:73.168.15.161 (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

And if the behavior resumes after the block expires, you will be reported again. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 00:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Once more: Edit warring at Daredevil (Marvel Comics)

Hello, I'm User:Tenebrae. You again appear to be edit-warring at an article, Daredevil (Marvel Comics), by reinserting uncited, unsupported claims evidently based on personal knowledge, a violation of NOR. You already have been warned that after a first revert, per the protocol of WP:BRD, we discuss any issues on the talk page and do not edit-war. Since you have been blocked previously for edit-warring at this same article, an admin at his or her discretion may impose discretionary sanctions for a pattern of persistent edit-warring, without waiting for WP:3RR.--Tenebrae (talk) 03:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Zjec. Just listen, I'm putting down the information I've researched. Do your homework.

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shun (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shun Di. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Reckless editing on Template:Static

Before you change the purpose of any template (or template redirect), be sure to look at where / if / how it is used. Your recent edit to Template:Static was reckless as the template is used on hundreds of IP talk pages. Of course that edit has been reverted. Please be more careful. Toddst1 (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Angel Devlin

I need help to change the title of Angel Devilin that I created for the Creeper homepage article from DC Comics. It's suppose to say Angel Devlin with one I not 2. User:Zjec 6:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Emrys Killbrew

I need help to change the title of Emyrs Killebrew to Emrys Killebrew that I created for the Deadpool homepage article from Marvel Comics. It's suppose to say Emrys Killebrew. User:Zjec 6:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Zjec, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Emrys Killebrew has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 12:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Angel Devlin

The article Angel Devlin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject lacks coverage in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 00:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

I it's supposed to say Angel Devlin that I created for the Creeper homepage article from DC Comics. That's how it's supposed to be so please don't delete it, but you can delete the typo Angel Devilin. User:Zjec 6:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Yuri Lowenthal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please find a reliable source for his roles in Bleach. He is not listed in CrystalAcids. Also, his role in Legion of Super Heroes needs to be sourced to an article that shows that to be among his most important roles if you are listing it up front. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Susan Banner

The article Susan Banner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: no RS can be found & the main article Hulk does not mention the subject. Article potentially exclusively contains original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Susan Banner is a part of Marvel Comics history based on thorough research' which is why there's no need to delete it. Just leave the article alone. User:Zjec (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Susan Banner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susan Banner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Banner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. *Trekker (talk) 09:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Zjec (talk) 02:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Hulk (comics). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Re Hulk

There is a very clear consensus at Talk:Hulk (comics) to list the TV show. Unless you can change that consensus (and "I don't like the TV show" is a bad argument), further attempts to revert can result in an edit warring block even if you do not violate WP:3RR. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

The 70s TV show didn't follow the source material! the page is supposed to show information regarding the true version' not something which was completely different. Zjec (talk) 08:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

(edit conflict) And that has been addressed on the talk page already. Repeatedly. WP:IDHT and WP:REHASH are starting to apply to you big time. With this exception, your only article edits have been to continue the edit war that got you blocked to begin with, despite not having come any closer to achieving a talk page consensus. As it says at WP:Edit warring: An editor who repeatedly restores his or her preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether their edits were justifiable: "but my edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is no defense. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:59, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Final warning

This is your final chance to stop. The next time you revert at Hulk (comics), you will be reported. I don't know what you think Wikipedia is, but we certainly don't remove information simply because you don't like the material. Your opinion on the material means little when it comes to actual editing, as we maintain a neutral point of view, and there is a clear community consensus against your edit at the moment. DarkKnight2149 03:56, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

You are being reported

I didn't want to do this, but you have been told repeatedly. And sock puppetry? Really? I was under the impression that you would be above that... DarkKnight2149 00:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

You can find the case at WP:ANI. Please take this time to re-think your position and remember that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort centred on consensus. That doesn't mean you have to agree with other editors all the time, but we as Wikipedians do have to respect the community consensus. DarkKnight2149 01:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for for sockpuppetry and edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ian.thomson (talk) 01:41, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zjec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My reason is respecting the source material, instead you obsessively keep reverting it back to information that has no relevance; which is insane and completely unjustified

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I haven't reverted once. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

You have, and your actions prove your arrogance. I choose to go with facts not information that has nothing to do with something entirely different. Ignoring it and encouraging it makes you oblivious to your surroundings, along with poor judgment.

Here is my contributions page. Here is the article history for Hulk (comics). Notice that I have made no edits to that article since July. Repeating the same tired arguments that have been repeatedly countered, making false accusations, completely missing the point, trying to blame everyone but yourself, and refusing to address the actual problems with your behavior are not going to get you unblocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Unblock request

I removed an unblock request posted from an IP address. If you wish to be unblocked, you need to sign in with your account. You'll need to address the reason for your block. --Yamla (talk) 14:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Continued sock puppetry

I hope that you are aware that by continuing to abuse sock puppets in order to edit war (as you just did again here), you are only making things worse and worse for yourself. DarkKnight2149 15:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• You've already been blocked once for logging out to edit war. Logging out to evade scrutiny is considered sockpuppetry. If you evade this block, you're extremely likely to be indefinitely blocked from editing. After your block expires, you can discuss your proposed changes on the talk page. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Because you've continued to engage in sockpuppetry and edit warring (which are wrong), I've made your block indefinite. All of your edits henceforth (good or bad) may now be treated like common vandalism. If you ever want to be useful to the site, you will need to stop editing under any and all accounts and IPs for at least six months, appeal on this page, and promise to never edit war or sockpuppet again. Agreeing to a topic ban from Hulk (comics) might also help. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zjec. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Beatrice Colen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beatrice Colen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatrice Colen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Block evasion

This user engaged in block evasion in May, 2018 as Ash87000 (talk · contribs). --Yamla (talk) 14:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Spore (comics)

The article Spore (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rick Stone (comics)

The article Rick Stone (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bill Brane

The article Bill Brane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vera Sweet

The article Vera Sweet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Terror (DC Comics)

The article Terror (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Supreme One (DC Comics)

The article Supreme One (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Static enemies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Static enemies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Static enemies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Static supporting characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Static supporting characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Static supporting characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:37, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yogi Bizerk

The article Yogi Bizerk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:26, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wingy Ames

The article Wingy Ames has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vincent Yatz

The article Vincent Yatz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Terror (DC Comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terror (DC Comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terror (DC Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Vincent Yatz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vincent Yatz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Yatz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Wingy Ames for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wingy Ames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wingy Ames until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Yogi Bizerk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yogi Bizerk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogi Bizerk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Proteus (DC Comics)

The article Proteus (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:16, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Angel Devlin

The article Angel Devlin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Drusilla (DC Comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drusilla (DC Comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drusilla (DC Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— TAnthony^Talk 18:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)