User talk:Zinderboff/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Zinderboff. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lushan Botanical Garden has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 17:41, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Format of infoboxes
Why did you change the format of the infobox in this edit? The standard format is set out at Template:Infobox academic. Khiikiat (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Khiikiat Hi there, thanks for reaching out. I understand you preferred the previous look? My goal with the change was to minimise the code and make it a bit cleaner, but readability is definitely important, and if the change has affected the readability, let me know.
- If there's a strong preference to keep the original spacing, I'm happy to revert it. Zinderboff(talk) 16:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Zinderboff: Removing the spacing makes it more difficult for editors to read through the parameters. If you were to restore the original spacing, it would be greatly appreciated. Khiikiat (talk) 09:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Khiikiat Got it, will do. Thanks for the feedback! Zinderboff(talk) 12:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Zinderboff: Removing the spacing makes it more difficult for editors to read through the parameters. If you were to restore the original spacing, it would be greatly appreciated. Khiikiat (talk) 09:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Zinderboff. Thank you for your work on Penghu air raids. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)