User talk:ZillennialWriter

Welcome!

Hi ZillennialWriter! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 12:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Still slowly figuring everything out so this is really helpful! :) ZillennialWriter (talk) 12:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cornelis Melief has been accepted

Cornelis Melief, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 11:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Its my first article so I'm happy its been created :) Hopefully I can help to develop it over time ZillennialWriter (talk) 20:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shannon Hayes (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shannon Hayes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 09:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review my article, your feedback is really helpful! ZillennialWriter (talk) 15:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shai Baitel has been accepted

Shai Baitel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It's good to see I'm improving :) ZillennialWriter (talk) 19:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZillennialWriter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I haven't been advertising or self promoting anything? I have no self interest in any of my edits or created articles. I'm not sure which edit has resulted in me being blocked, I just like jumping between topics/people to find edits that can be made. Please can this be reviewed so I can be unblocked? Thank you. ZillennialWriter (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi GeneralNotability do you know if I'm meant to create another account? I saw two accounts with a similar name to yours suggested I should because the block was in error, but this has now been reverted. Sorry, I've still been getting used to Wikipedia, and I'm a bit confused! ZillennialWriter (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a vandal that monitors the unblock requests category and tries to convince people to evade their block which will only get them in further trouble. Do not create a new account. You can check to see if a user is an actual administrator by going to Special:ActiveUsers, and search for a username which will bring up their user rights(including "administrator"). You can also check the logs of a user to see how recently their account was created, new accounts are not adminstrators. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In short, do not believe people who tell you to create a new account to get around your block. 331dot (talk) 10:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

331dot That makes sense, thank you for your reply! ZillennialWriter (talk) 10:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How are you choosing the subjects of your edits? 331dot (talk) 10:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It depends really, sometimes I’ll be watching the TV and see something and think ‘oo I can check their Wikipedia page’, other times I follow threads on Twitter that lead me to thinking about edits. I’m also based in Manchester so I have an interest in the local area which is some of my edits. I also used to live in London where I did an Art based degree which is why I have some arty edits. I worked in the city of London before moving back to Manc so that definitely piqued my interest in politics and finance (plus that’s all the news is these days!) Sorry that I'm repeating posting this, I wasn't sure if I had replied/posted properly ZillennialWriter (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I forgot to add that I often make edits when I believe I can neutralise what's written as I've found theres a lot of opinions on peoples pages that are in the news or talked about on Twitter :) ZillennialWriter (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How about Draft:ISA Pharmaceuticals B.V.? What made you decide to write about them? GeneralNotability (talk) 00:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, have you ever used any other accounts? GeneralNotability (talk) 00:49, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I don't have any other accounts/never used any other accounts. I created the ISA Pharmaceuticals article as it was a company I came across whilst I was researching a type of cancer. A family member of mine was diagnosed and this company was/is doing human clinical trials for this specific type of cancer. As a result I did a lot of research into them and later realised I could use what I'd found to create the article (although it still needs some work and I'm not sure if it will pass the review process). Hope that helps! ZillennialWriter (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you know what I would need to do to be unbanned? Thanks! ZillennialWriter (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you know when my block request will be reviewed? Thanks! ZillennialWriter (talk) 10:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do I need to contact someone at Wikipedia to review my block? I'm happy to answer any more questions editors have. I only joined last year as I saw wikipedia was in need of female editors but if not I'll just delete my account. Thanks again ZillennialWriter (talk) 09:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything else I can do to help? Thanks! ZillennialWriter (talk) 09:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Just a note that I'll take over as reviewing admin as the editor is overdue for a decision.) Nosebagbear (talk) 01:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ISA Pharmaceuticals B.V. (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ISA Pharmaceuticals B.V. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZillennialWriter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shannon Hayes

Hello, ZillennialWriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shannon Hayes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZillennialWriter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, would my block be able to be reviewed? I'm happy to answer any questions editors have and I've reviewed the current Wiki guidelines so that going forward there aren't any issues. (The previous block review was left for too long so I thought I would try again.) Thank you. ZillennialWriter (talk) 11:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Shannon Hayes

Hello, ZillennialWriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shannon Hayes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ISA Pharmaceuticals B.V.

Hello, ZillennialWriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ISA Pharmaceuticals B.V., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ISA Pharmaceuticals B.V.

Hello, ZillennialWriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ISA Pharmaceuticals B.V.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]