User talk:Zeromacnoo

Talk to me, my people

Hi Zeromacnoo, I was wondering what you think of the template box as used in the Billy Brandt page? Though structure is nice, it doesn't add much in my opinion, and I don't really like it that the layout is so much influenced by the box. (in my opinion, just a larger box cover image in a frame looks better). Let me know what you think ;-)

Your new additions look great by the way. We're really making progress!

Spheroide 17:59, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really crazy about template boxes. The question is, do you want to spend time arguing about this with User:Daydream believer2, who I assume is attached to the idea, or spend your time creating new articles? I'd leave it alone. If he starts to add them to other articles, then let's talk to him about it, but otherwise I don't think it's worth it.
It is so much better creating new content here when I get to read articles written by others as well. I really enjoy your contributions. Zeromacnoo 18:05, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Let's just leave it for now. Spheroide 22:22, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at the discussion on the autofellatio image you told me about. Indeed, neverending discussion ;-) There is a clear statement about Wikipedia not being there to protect minors from possible harmful content in the What Wikipedia Is Not-page though, so I now think the image on the Simon Rex page is ok. I'll stick to DVD covers though, just to be sure.

A possible mass-deletion for all the gay porn actor articles is also one of my concerns. Indeed, the best way to prevent that is by just writing very good articles! And showing "they are all connected" in a true Wikipedia fashion by linking them where needed. Working on that ;-) A mass deletion would be really stupid, though, since a lot of these articles are interesting for a large group of people. These guys didn't become porn stars for nothing of course! Perfect material for Wikipedia, especially since this could become thé #1 source of structured information if the subject of gay porn stars (and studios) in Wikipedia progresses further. It needs time and contributions of course. Bye!

P.s. I don't think you get a "new message" message when I reply to something you write to me on my own talk page do you? It would give a more structured talk maybe... Spheroide 21:25, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Great new adition, for Tag Adams, I didn't even know him until today. Ah the wonders of Wikipedia. The added image indeed gives the entire article a much better look, and happily DVD covers are allowed, as long as they are low res. I also followed your advice on the "List of pornographic movie studios", and have just added my new article on Cobra Video there. I think we should limit our images to the more "decent" ones. I think it's all fine as long as we don't put any hard penisses up there ;) Personally, I think the image in the article on Simon Rex, is just a little over the limit for an encyclopedia (even an encyclopedia starting to contain a lot of cool articles on porn stars)... What do you think?

Spheroide 18:47, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh... I just wrote "I think the new structure for list of male porn stars is much better", of course I should have written "I think the new structure for list of gay porn stars is much better". Oops.

Spheroide 19:37, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I think I'll add the Junior Studio article somewhere this week. I have to do some research first, since I have no idea if it is owned by Kevin Clarke / Richard Morgan or of they just work for it. Any idea?

I think the new structure for the list of male porn stars is much better. Especially the anchor letters at the top, very handy! It's gonna take us another 100 years to complete the list though ;-)

Spheroide 19:31, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for your help!

Hi Zeromacnoo, thanx for helping me with edits on some of the gay porn star pages I created or edited lately. It's cool to have a feeling of not being alone in this part of the Wikipedia ;-) Maybe one day we'll have all important/interesting gay male porn stars covered. For now, lot's of work still to be done!

p.s. I just added Brent Everett

Spheroide 20:40, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Zeromacnoo, Welcome to Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some valuable resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Naming conventions

Manual of Style

In addition, you can sign your name in talk pages and voting by typing three tildes (~~~). Four tildes (~~~~) signs your name and also displays the date which you signed your name. If you have any further questions, please see Wikipedia's help pages, add a question or comment to the village pump, or ask me on my User Talk page. Thank you for signing up!

- тəzєті

RE: your query

A recent photoshoot of Vince Rockland

I only changed fictional info into factual info. I didn't add anything substantial for a reason: No one likes people prying into their personal lives.

Send me an email and I'll reply to you directly, under the condition that you don't release the info.

All email unregistered with the account is automatically routed into the the junk folder and deleted in 7 days. I rarely check it, but keep my eyes peeled in this case.

paramatma@hotmail.com

Thanks

Thank you for the tip about DVD covers. Hopefully I will find the time to upload some soon; it's quite a job just trying to get the text itself in shape. Looks like we're working towards the same goal, but involving different sides of the industry :) -EdgarAllanToe 17:24, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Wolff pic..

Hey there Zeromacnoo, Would it be Ok if I replace that DVD cover of Mark Wolff that you uploaded with this other low res one? The reason why is because this is of his most recent video and it shows him more prominently unlike the other cover. PLMK. Thanks. :)

File:Lords of the lockerroom.jpeg

--Hecktor 20:07, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Morgan (porn star)

I've speedy deleted the article (non-notable bio). It may have been a vanity page... Lectonar 13:13, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to imply that these performers are non-notable in general (sorry if you took it like that), but this particular one was definitely not notable enough for an encyclopedia. Regards. Lectonar 07:45, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rex Chandler Help

Hey there. I noticed that you are one of the high up guys of porn star entries. I was wondering if you could possibly look at the Rex Chandler page I made and let me know if it is offensive or not. He is nude, but in a flaccid at ease pose. If you could moderate it to confirm if it is safe or not I would be very appreciative. Thanks!

Gay Romanian Porn

Hey..I liked ur articles..I ve started an article called Romanian Gay Porn...I watched some clips from Romanian gay movies..I dont know who produce them...Actors are generally brunette muscled hunks...

In one movie bottom one was wearing a mask...

Hi Zeromacnoo, thanks for ur reply. I had tried to add an article about "Romanian Gay Porn". I am interested in porn movies of romanian porn stars . They speak Romanian in the movies so I thought movies were produced in Romania. Do you have knowledge about romanian porn stars (i dont mean Ion Davidov)? and about these movies..who produce them?

Serkanbulan

Benjamin Bradley

I voted to keep the article. If good work like this is just thrown away, then people won't want to contribute to wikipedia any more. -- ProveIt ^(talk) 04:18, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Full body contact.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Full body contact.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another one under attack

Hi, Zeromacnoo. I noticed you're concerned with deletionists going after adult oriented entries so I thought I'd bring this to your attention in the hope that you'll lend your support. After it was kept the first time, the List of Perfect 10 models has been put up for deletion a second time. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Perfect 10 models (second nomination) The claim is made that almost none of the models are notable, even though over 40 have their own Wikipedia entries. But far worse than that, it's being argued that since an un-named model sent an e-mail to an admin saying she didn't want to be listed, the WHOLE list should be deleted! If allowed to succeed, it'll mean that the same reason can be given to pre-emptively delete ANY adult oriented list whenever someone decides to pull it. --Alsayid 23:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zeromacnoo: I am new to Wikipedia, and I have a very simple question. On the List of Gay Porn Stars, of the porn stars that do not appear in blue with a link to their Wikipedia article, why are some of the porn stars in red and invite you to write a Wikipedia article on them, and others are in black with no invitation to create an article? Who determines which porn stars appear in red type? Just wondering. RichardDKBaird 06:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC) --RichardDKBaird[reply]

Tristan Paris?

Hi Zeromacnoo, I was going through the porn stub list and noticed an article on a gay porn star, Tristan Paris. Since this is your area of expertise, perhaps you may know whether or not we should {{prod}}/{{afd}} this article or not. It's obviously sparse and has no references of any kind. Your knowledge and help would be appreciated! Thanks! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 23:50, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Young Physique Magazine

WHY did you remove my reference to Young Physique magazine? It is important that people know about this magazine. It was the most important gay magazine of the 1960's. Also, in my opinion, models look more sexy when they are wearing g-strings than when they are simply naked. RichardDKBaird 06:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You said "Please feel free to add any information or additional titles that you may have" in your entry on the List of Gay Pornographic Magazines discussion page: Zeromacnoo 18:26, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC).

So again, WHY did you remove my reference to Young Physique magazine? RDKB

Oops! I am so sorry! I did that by mistake. I have now restored your description. Please accept my apology. I am glad you caught my mistake. I must slow down when I edit so that I don't do things like that again. Keep up the great work. Zeromacnoo 23:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Young Physique.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Young Physique.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:08, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Lopez

Zeromacnoo, could you take a look at Miguel Lopez and tell me what you think? Is Miguel notable at all? It looks like it needs sources and some fixup, as far as I can tell. Thanks in advance! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 20:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be legitimate, and the controversy makes him notable, although I should look for a source for that. I'l be away for a couple of weeks, and will look into this more when I get back. Zeromacnoo 12:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Great! Thanks! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 00:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Rhodes

Hey, I've recently created an article for Erik Rhodes, and apparently, there was an actor by the same name in the 1930s. I created a disambiguation page to distinguish them, and made a search for Erik Rhodes link to the disambiguation page. This has upset someone, who has requested that the actor's page be moved to the default under the theory that the actor is more notable. I disagree; I think the porn star is at least as notable as the actor from the 1930s. I see your name across quite a few of the porn pages, and was wondering if you had any opinion to voice on the notability of Mr. Rhodes? I would appreciate any help that you have to offer. --Todd 07:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with the porn star page being added, if indeed it is deemed notable, what I object to is that SneakyTodd moved the actor from his existing page to Erik Rhodes (actor). This disabled numerous existing links. The guideline that I have seen in the past is to put a link at the top of the original page to the new page or to a disambiguation page when there are several, instead of just one more person of the same name, leaving the original article in place. The other question that I have, if this an area of your expertise, is the numerous links to commercial sites on the porn stars page. It was my understanding that these commercial links were not to be used. Doc 08:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References needed

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Sean Davis (porn star), but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! RFerreira 00:22, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the heads-up on the Erik Rhodes discussion! Although I'm not fanatically devoted to preserving porn star pages, I'd usually agree with keeping them. And I can't deny I always enjoy finding out more in this particular area :p. Daydream believer2 03:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto

I appreciate the heads-up as well. Any way to contact you privately? I'd like to ask questions "off the record" to at least postpone demonstrating my ignorance.... My E-mail this user link works. Chidom 06:18, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be interested in learning more about what's happening, privately, as well. And if you can make any film recommendations :p... Daydream believer2 09:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May I borrow your eagle eye?

How-dee. Could you take a gander at these two pages and see if you find any glaring errors? I've been working on them for so long that I can't see anything anymore; you wouldn't believe the error I did find before the last save (I'm not telling!). When or if you get a chance; otherwise, I'm sure someone will catch things along the way. 1. Adult Erotic Gay Video Awards; 2. Grabby recipients—Chidom ^talk 06:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Beefcake Magazines Added

I (RichardDKBaird) am using the name Keranous now. I changed my screen name because I though your name "Zeromacnoo" was so cool. I added the new magazines from my collection as I said I would to your Beefcake magazines article. I organized the magazines into full sized and pocket sized. Best wishes, Keraunos 02:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Hope your break was for rest and relaxation and not because of some problem. Good to "see" you again.—Chidom ^talk 01:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

T'anks

Glad you liked the articles. I'm not sure how much more time I'll be giving Wikipedia, either—life is ramping up on other fronts.—Chidom ^talk 00:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Donovan

I'm a frequent wikipedia editor...and I put Rick Donovan in go bar... and nothing came up! Glad I found him...but being the only Rick Donovan on Wikipedia (and the only one who really counts!), I moved him to Rick Donovan and modified your User page. Bastiqâ¼e ^demandez 20:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Falcon Enterntainment

I've added a copy of the page to User:Zeromacnoo/Falcon. A few words however, saying that "Some people believe that nothing the in the world of gay porn deserves an article on Wikipedia for reasons of prudishness, but they must be reminded that Wikipedia is not censored" is not called for. The article was deleted because it looked like an advertisement. There is no need to make uncivil claims about "prudishness" nor a need to remind anyone that Wikipedia's censorship policies when they are marking things under standard deletion criteria. JoshuaZ 21:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I guess I didn't look hard enough for what happened to the Falcon article. I created a stub replacement for it, and one of the people that speedy deleted the original is now attempted to delete the stub article I created for lack of notability, and because it is currently just a placeholder article. Based on your editting habits, I figured you might be able to aid in the debate. -Todd(Talk-Contribs) 05:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping the LGBT notice board up to date with the results of the AFD about Falcon. However, please archive resolved entries by adding them to the sections lower on the page. Thanks. -- Samuel Wantman 01:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandre Frota

Hi. I notice you've made edits in the past to the Alexandre Frota article. I've expressed several concerns about the article on its Talk page; please take a moment to read them and help edit the article to meet Wikipedia policies and guidelines, or it may be deleted.

(If your edits were strictly of the maintenance variety, and this information doesn't interest you, please pardon any perceived intrustion.)

Thanks.—Chidom ^talk 02:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability (pornographic actors): Non-American awards

I was thinking of adding some European adult industry awards to the list of awards demonstrating the notability of a porn actor. I wanted to give you a chance to weigh in before making this change. Discussion here. â Iamcuriousblue 03:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Brawnzmen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brawnzmen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Pornography

Hi â

I'm contacting you because you're listed as an active member of WikiProject Porn stars. I'm interested in creating a WikiProject Pornography and have started a poll to see whether WikiProject Porn stars should be merged into that project or remain separate. I'm fine with either. Please weigh in at: Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Porn stars: Proposal: WikiProject Pornography

Thanks â Iamcuriousblue 21:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Good enough to eat vhs.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Good enough to eat vhs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. âAn gr 15:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Billys tale vhs.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Billys tale vhs.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. âAn gr 15:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Way_you_like_it.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Way_you_like_it.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tough competition 2.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tough competition 2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:A Night at Bruno'sDVD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A Night at Bruno'sDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sit tight dvd.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sit tight dvd.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Vladimir Correa

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Vladimir Correa, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Vladimir Correa seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Vladimir Correa, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:40, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vggay5908.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vggay5908.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created is about to be deleted: Tools which can help you

The article you created, Dano_Sulik is about to be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dano_Sulik.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
You can merge the article into a larger article.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 03:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hans Mueller

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hans Mueller, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Brad Stone (porn star)

I have nominated Brad Stone (porn star), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Stone (porn star). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Outsider80 (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Adam Hart

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scott Mac (Doc) 21:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Christy twins

I have nominated Christy twins, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christy twins. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:23, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of male performers in gay porn films

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of male performers in gay porn films. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of male performers in gay porn films (5th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sean Davis (actor)

I have nominated Sean Davis (actor), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Davis (actor). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Cort Stevens

I have nominated Cort Stevens, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cort Stevens. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rick Donovan

I have nominated Rick Donovan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Donovan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 05:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Leo Ford

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Leo Ford. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Ford. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cody Foster

The article Cody Foster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PORNBIO. no indication the subject can meet the GNG or any other specialized guideline. Very little reliably sourced content, no indication article could be more than a stub.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Northern exposures va dvd.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Northern exposures va dvd.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Zeromacnoo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 44 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Tag Adams - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jason Ross (pornographic actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Aiden Shaw - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ty Russell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kip Noll

The article Kip Noll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 13:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris Stone

The article Chris Stone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 14:14, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ty Russell

The article Ty Russell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ty Russell

I have nominated Ty Russell, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ty Russell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Epbr123 (talk) 00:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Chris Stone

I have nominated Chris Stone, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Stone. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Talvin DeMachio

I have nominated Talvin DeMachio, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talvin DeMachio. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kris Lord

The article Kris Lord has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PORNBIO and has no significant reliable coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 10:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Butch Taylor (pornographic actor)

The article Butch Taylor (pornographic actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline. The "Dave Award" barely exists, and certainly isn't notable or well-known; it's derived from a "year's best" list by a non-notable columnist in a low-rent non-notable porn magazine/guide. No reliable/verifiable sourcing, just linkfarming and gardening

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brandon Lee (pornographic actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brandon Lee (pornographic actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Lee (pornographic actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ty Russell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ty Russell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ty Russell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epbr123 (talk) 09:27, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vladimir Correa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladimir Correa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Correa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epbr123 (talk) 14:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you will be interested in keeping the article on such a well-known pornographic actor as Vladimir Correa. They are as usual applying a too rigid application of the WP:PORNBIO policy. So, maybe you would be interested in registering a keep on the proposed deletion page. (You are special to me because you are the first person I encountered on Wikipedia when I went on Wikipedia for the first time in May/June 2006 and started adding info to the Young Physique article.) Best wishes, Keraunos (talk) 10:41, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeff Hammond (pornographic actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeff Hammond (pornographic actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Hammond (pornographic actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ty Russell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ty Russell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ty Russell (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matt Gunther for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Gunther is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Gunther until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 02:06, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Davenport (actor)

The article John Davenport (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just another porn-related BLP without any independent reliable sourcing or any legitimate assertion of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 22:58, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Davenport (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Davenport (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Davenport (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gnu 57 14:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristen Bjorn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristen Bjorn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristen Bjorn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 17:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Rush (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Rush (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Rush (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 20:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]