User talk:Zeedigi

Your submission at Articles for creation: IDN Media: Empowering the Next Generation of Indonesia (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IDN Media: Empowering the Next Generation of Indonesia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Zeedigi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:IDN Media: Empowering the Next Generation of Indonesia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:IDN Media: Empowering the Next Generation of Indonesia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 14:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blink49 Studios (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blink49 Studios and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 11:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear Bonadea,

Thank you for taking the time to review my submission, Draft

Studios. I appreciate your detailed feedback. I understand the concerns regarding the promotional tone and the need for neutrality in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines.

I will revisit the article and rewrite it to ensure that it adheres to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Additionally, I will incorporate more independent, reliable sources to better establish the notability of the subject. My goal is to align the submission with the encyclopedia's standards.

Thank you for your guidance, and I look forward to improving the draft.

Best regards,

Zeeshan Zeedigi (talk) 17:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

If you're using an AI to communicate with us, please don't. We want to hear from you, not an AI. 331dot (talk) 09:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Hello Zeedigi. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Zeedigi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Zeedigi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello 331dot, thank you for reaching out. I want to clarify that I am not being compensated, directly or indirectly, for my edits to this article or any other articles on Wikipedia. I have made these edits in good faith, based on my interest in the topic and my desire to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please let me know if there are specific concerns about my edits, and I will gladly address them. Thank you Regards, Zee Zeedigi (talk) 15:35, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 15:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

I didn't check before, but your username is that of a marketing company- I take this to mean that you are editing about clients, which would make you a paid editor, it does not require specific payment for edits. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zeedigi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologize for the issues caused by my edits and username. I acknowledge that my original edits were promotional in nature, which is against Wikipedia's guidelines. I understand now that Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion, and I commit to following all guidelines regarding neutral point of view and reliable sourcing in the future. I will disclose any paid editing as required and avoid editing articles where there might be a conflict of interest. If unblocked, I plan to focus on making neutral, well-sourced contributions to existing articles and improving the encyclopedia's content. My new username will be “welcomezee25”. Thank you for considering my request. Zeedigi (talk) 17:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. asilvering (talk) 01:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I fixed the formatting of your request. Someone else will review it; please speak to your seeming dishonesty when I made my initial inquiry above. 331dot (talk) 18:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)