User talk:Zeborah

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Zeborah! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:

There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk Pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Ryan 10:31, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, Zeborah!

Thanks for tidying up the tenses in the Cathedral Architecture of Western Europe page!

--Amandajm 14:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		For bringing the article Sociolinguistics research in India (AfD) to the Heyman Standard. utcursch \| talk 03:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work in rescuing the article! Perhaps it would be useful to contact the early delete voters to see if they are aware of the recent changes in the article and if that changes their opinion. I almost missed the revisions and would have hated if my vote had contributed to the article's deletion
Aside: Do you think the article would be better named Sociolinguistics in India ? That seems to be a broader subject, which can be addressed using the references that you have located. At a minimum , I think we should have a redirect from that name till a separate article is created on the specific topic. Cheers. Abecedare 19:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Planet killer

Hi, I noticed you made a comment to Richard about this and I wanted to inform you about my effort to rewrite the page as a list, draft here: User:Wl219/List of fictional weapons of mass destruction. I'd welcome your comments. Wl219 23:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Resque Squadron Move Request

Greetings, I'm tring to get the current move request sorted so we can move on to other ones if we need to. Would you mind stating your position in: Article Rescue Squadron Talk #Requested_move, Thanks Fosnez 11:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elephant's graveyard cleanup

Hiya, this is 66.69.210.78, just letting you know I responded to the request for more info regarding the clean up of the Elephant's graveyard article. See the discussion page for this IP address for the details. User:66.69.210.78 —Preceding comment was added at 04:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joyeux Noël

I just want to wish my fellow Wikipedians a Merry Christmas! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 05:28, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dangerous Liaisons

hello. thanks for the inquiry. marquise and viscount are titles equivalent to count and countess or in some systems, boron and baroness. the use of the definite article is incorrect, and would be akin to saying, The Marquis de Sade, The Count Dracula, or for that matter, The Queen Elizabeth. i suppose i am remiss for not scanning the page for all occurrences, but that was the only one that stood out. --emerson7 12:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

The cumulative edit histories at Mongolia during Tang rule and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongolia during Tang rule are troubling; and I'm especially concerned about the disruptive successes of the one I call "Mr/Ms Anonymous."

As nearly as I can tell, the following vandalism warnings are justified:

I don't expect these warnings to be effective, but the gesture does demonstrate that I'm vexed by what I've encountered in what appears to be the work of just one person.

I share this with you as a way of illustrating by contrast how pleased I was to watch your constructive strategy unfold at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongolia during Tang rule#Stop and regroup.

An unexpected development?

I'm reluctant to put another problem in your lap, but I don't know what else to do? Please bear with me.

What I construe to be a well-meaning editor has changed the name of Mongolia during Tang rule to Inner Asia during the Tang Dynasty ... which throws off the AfD-template in an inconvenient way. The interplay of things wrong with this "move" are too complicated for me to untangle. Are you willing and able to do what is needed? Alternately, will you please pass this problem to someone who can handle it?

My personal interest in this dispute is in ensuring that an informed consensus evolves; and I'm concerned that this new complication may exacerbate something crucial in the fragile process you are trying to shepherd along. --Tenmei (talk) 03:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further development

Please see Talk:Inner Asia during the Tang Dynasty#Semi-protection needed. --Tenmei (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for good advice. Also, maybe having things spelled out clearly as you have done -- but directed at me -- will indirectly affect Anon in a constructive way whe he/she reads it? --Tenmei (talk) 21:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for whatever can be construed as my part in the stressful exchanges of the past week. In retrospect, every well-intentioned contribution just made this situation worse because the most relevant factors were not within the ambit of anything written explicitly presented on the screen in front of me.

I regret the extent to which my contributions exacerbated a problem I was trying to mitigate. No one could have been more surprised than me as I continued producing the opposite of intended results. I'm not unsubtle; but all I can say at this point is that I will continue trying to learn from my mistakes. I know this isn't much of an apology; but there you have it. --Tenmei (talk) 15:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More than meets the eye

As it turns out, the anonymous IP-editor appears to have been a sock puppet of a banned disruptive contributor specializing in fomenting disputes in articles about East Asian topics. Only by "looking outside the box" (on the basis of information not known to you or me at the time) was it possible to diagnose what was happening from the genesis of Mongolia during Tang rule through the serial WP:AfD threads and thereafter. In short, there was always more to the discussion threads than meets the eye .... --Tenmei (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom case

An Arbitration case has been opened, and is located here. As I understand it, the open-ended process invites anyone to participate, not only those who contributed to the thread which led to a case being opened.

I wonder if this forum might be worth your investment of time and attention -- if only because of the possibility that you glimpse some better way of dealing with those who would dismiss, deride, or devalue any future contribution labeling anyone "pro-Mongolian" (as if it were a self-evident and obviously perjorative term). This seems rather like those who have sought to diminish my Wikipedia contributions with a label "Japanese" (as if "Japanese" were to be understood an arguably derisive term).

I would guess you probably understand that my primary focus is elsewhere, but I'm still troubled by that "pro-Mongolian" gambit in the AfD thread. It's not so much that the innuendo was introduced, although I'm very clear that it shouldn't have been tolerated by the consensus. What still bothers me particularly is that this derisive tactic proved to be so easy, so effective, so readily accepted by the so-called "uninvolved" or "neutral" others in that discussion thread. I wish there were some way to leverage this ArbCom "event" so that such needless tactics were less easy or that such heedless claims were accorded closer scrutiny? Just a thought ...?

To be frank, I don't quite understand how this will unfold at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Tang Dynasty.

Formal notice that the case had been accepted included the following, which I construe as being addressed to anyone who has anything to do with this unraveling knot of problems:

Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Tang Dynasty/Evidence.
Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible.
You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Tang Dynasty/Workshop.

Bottom line: If you can see some way to convert this from a mere academic exercise into something with practical and practicable consequences, please share your thoughts with me or with some member of ArbCom. You aren't obliged to do anything, but, as promised, I'm keeping you informed as developments follow one after another.

On an optimistic note, will you join me in hoping that this process can be converted into something which is demonstrably constructive, useful, helpful? --Tenmei (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Todd

Thanks for pointing that out! I've added the cite to the main Julian Todd article. Artw (talk) 02:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeev Janardan‎‎

Duh! I should have searched for Rajiv, but didn't. Must have been having a bad day, glad you did a proper job! pablo_hablo. 09:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

	The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
	Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue \| Next issue

Content

The community is currently

deciding whether

60,000

articles should be deleted.

background

Do we really want our initials to be IRS?

RE: Do we really want our initials to be IRS?

So funny, thanks for stopping by the WP:ARS wikiproject talk page. Sometimes I wonder where all these editors are, and weeks, sometimes months later, they appear, as you did, with some really wonderful and in your case, funny, comments. Okip 03:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cargo cult encyclopaedia article writing

You are dealing with cargo cult encyclopaedia article writing, if you want a name for it. ☺ Uncle G (talk) 11:30, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover \| Feature \| News and announcements \| Humor \| Want ads
To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zeborah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Zeborah/Crossed Genres has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Zeborah/Crossed Genres. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 04:36, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crossed Genres (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I see a decent write up on Wired, but the other references are either dead links or to non-notable blogs / sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crossed Genres and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 01:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Zeborah, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 01:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zeborah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Crossed Genres concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Crossed Genres, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Crossed Genres

Hello, Zeborah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Crossed Genres".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zeborah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Southland, New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Makogai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Quail Island

Quail Island (New Zealand) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kumara

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]