User talk:Zebaad

Welcome!

Hello, Zebaad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Zebaad, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 02:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zebaad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zebaad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 02:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Zebaad. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 02:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zebaad

Hello Zebaad,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Zebaad for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 02:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

multiple accounts

Hello, Zebaad, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Thank you. Meters (talk) 02:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I only have one account ToxicBiscuit was a friend of mine whome i was talking to at the time yet i can't revoke this block because I am blocked...

`{{unblock|your reason here}}`

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zebaad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only have one account I was talking with a fiend called ToxicBiscuit at the time, and we both used our accounts for similar things, however I have one account being blocked for "multiple accounts" when it clearly states that you are only allowed one thus I only have one. This block is not only invalid but it is also fairly stupid because appealing to unblock takes both time and energy even though I was blocked for a reason which was not true. I breached no agreement ergo why have I been blocked In addition I am new to wiki and I was learning how to use it and it appears yes i may have accidentally put things in the wrong place but now I know where and how I should be entering. Plus I was banned for "having multiple accounts" not because I was trying to make sense of what was going on. I do have intention to contribute towards the encyclopedia and no I have no intention of being WP:NOTHERE This has just been assumed from my lack on knowledge, which I was not given time to remedy before being banned for "having multiple accounts", to fix the mistakes I had made.

Decline reason:

Your deleted edits strongly suggest you are WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Even if you weren't the same people, you were demonstrating the same behaviors. You should probably read WP:MEAT. You made an agreement to comply with all the policies, including that on meat puppetry, when you signed up for an account. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 18:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zebaad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In addition I am new to wiki and I was learning how to use it and it appears yes i may have accidentally put things in the wrong place but now I know where and how I should be entering. Plus I was banned for "having multiple accounts" not because I was trying to make sense of what was going on. I do have intention to contribute towards the encyclopedia and no I have no intention of being WP:NOTHERE This has just been assumed from my lack on knowledge, which I was not given time to remedy before being banned for "having multiple accounts", to fix the mistakes I had made.

Decline reason:

The following is from an article you wrote.

“

the first to die in the great squirrel exodus of 1876, his unruly nature and chastity has made him highly abnormal.

Shoot on sight. Also buy his maps.

”

This article was written by you, and signed "ToxicBiscuit". In this context, I am declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 23:42, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Toxic Biscuit was not me. I did not write that, nor did I know he wrote it, IE, I did not write it an sign it. I don't know why you can't simply check the ips because they clearly are not from the same location. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zebaad (talk • contribs)

Checkuser isn't the be-all and end-all; if you used a proxy for one account but not the other it wouldn't work. I cannot check the validity of your argument, but I trust PhilKnight. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 02:49, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]