Jump to content

User talk:Zarabgc1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at America's Next Top Model (season 10). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 23:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:The fashionable baby per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The fashionable baby. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 03:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zarabgc1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was just trying to add the timeline of the cast members of the season I didn’t know that it was considered “bad” Also I never added false information on Wikipedia I always fix issues when I see them. I genuinely didn’t know adding a timeline of the season they were on was considered “bad”

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abuse of multiple accounts. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 05:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Zarabgc1 (talk) 04:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:The fashionable baby per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The fashionable baby. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 09:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zarabgc1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

They said I am blocked for abuse of multiple accounts when that’s not the case. I always try to fix issues I see on here. I should not be blocked for “abusing” multiple accounts that I made.

Decline reason:

Yes you should. You are a human being who has been blocked from Wikipedia. The quality of your edits while you are evading your block is not relevant. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 23:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zarabgc1 (talk) 22:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]