User talk:ZagrosianSigma
Welcome!
[edit]Hi ZagrosianSigma! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Un assiolo (talk) 15:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Iraqi dinar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ad Orientem (talk) 06:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]Hello, I keep reporting them for their edit war but no one responds to me, only when I undo their edit then someone comes and gives me a warning, if you check their edits they kept editing with no source. ZagrosianSigma (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Unblock request
[edit]
ZagrosianSigma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear admins, I have been blocked and I think there has been a misunderstanding here, those users kept vandalizing and that user had 4 socketpuppets and I reported them but no one responded to me and the admins only targeted me while they broke many rules I really need help and Im sure there has been a misunderstanding because I havent done anything wrong. ZagrosianSigma (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not address what is discussed in the investigation(linked to in the block message). 331dot (talk) 16:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Another Appeal for Block - Clarification on the Account and Socketpuppetry
[edit]ZagrosianSigma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedian Administrators,
Im writing to appeal another block for my account which I understand I was blocked due to concerns on socketpuppetry and I thank the administrators for doing their job, my previous account combatuser1 has been blocked and I stated before that I don’t have any access to the account and forgot the password and didn’t add any email to it, I didn’t know anything about Wikipedia at that time and I admit and express my regrets on the mistakes I’ve done and I really apologize for what I’ve done with abusing multiple accounts and I didn’t have any bad intentions or trying to spread chaos, I created that account to make it my main account and created in good faith and I want to make sure and clarify that the mistakes I’ve done will never happen again and I request a second chance to make better and more intelligent edits on Wikipedia, Thank you for your time. Sincerely,
Decline reason:
You have created multiple accounts on Wikipedia. I suggest your best chance of being unblocked is to take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no more accounts, or logged out editing. PhilKnight (talk) 16:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZagrosianSigma (talk) 12:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
**Subject:** 2nd Appeal for Unblock – Username [Combatuser1] & [CarmineZero]
[edit]ZagrosianSigma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Im writing again after 2-3 months to appeal another block for my account which I understand I was blocked due to concerns on socketpuppetry and I thank the administrators for doing their job, my previous account combatuser1 has been blocked and I stated before that I don’t have any access to the account and forgot the password and didn’t add any email to it, I didn’t know anything about Wikipedia at that time and I admit and express my regrets upon the mistakes I’ve done and I really apologize for what I’ve done with abusing multiple accounts and I didn’t have any bad intentions or trying to spread chaos, I created that account to turn it into my main account and created in good faith and I want to make sure and clarify that the mistakes I’ve done will never happen again and I request for a second chance to make better and more intelligent edits on Wikipedia, Thank you for your time. Sincerely,
Decline reason:
There's nothing good-faith about creating a new account to evade a ban on an old account. To qualify under WP:SO, you need to go six months with zero edits. To help you out, that's now 2025-05-12. At that point, you'll need to follow WP:UNBAN. You've been so abusive, no admin is free to unilaterally lift your ban, it can only be lifted with the consensus of the community. Yamla (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Yamla: Its gotta be 18/3/2025 because I havent made an edit since september.
- You have made two edits right here today. You are free to try on 2025-03-18 but will all but certainly fail. I will certainly oppose any unban request made by you if you haven't gone at least six months with zero edits. --Yamla (talk) 15:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
@Yamla: Is there any way if I can be unbanned on march/18?
- Frankly, I think it's unlikely you'll be unbanned on 2025-05-12. So far, you've worked hard to demonstrate you should not be unbanned. I think the odds of this happening in March of 2025 are essentially zero. --Yamla (talk) 15:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)