User talk:Yylecaksberri

October 2022

Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sandpaper—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 16:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:31, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kenjirō Tokutomi into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:37, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm LaundryPizza03. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bismuth have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Catcher in the Rye have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Catcher in the Rye was changed by Yylecaksberri (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922512 on 2023-07-19T13:12:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Woman Is the Nigger of the World. SilverLocust 💬 06:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Yylecaksberri

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as User:Yylecaksberri, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Uhai (talk) 05:04, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism, as you did at User:Yylecaksberri.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]