User talk:Yuri.simione

Welcome!

Hi Yuri.simione! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! It is not an easy task to write simple articles. Now I appreciate more complex articles in Wikipedia!!! Yuri.simione (talk) 20:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Yuri.simione. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Ultipa, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello Yuri.simione. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yuri.simione. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yuri.simione|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Uhai (talk) 20:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Uhai. I have added a brief introduction about myself. I have communicated (in advance!) that I may start a collaboration with Ultipa but mine is a genuine, unpaid contribution, in that I have edited the content from the perspective of a database expert, not providing personal judgments about the database but remaining neutral and taking articles from other similar products/companies as a point of reference. If you contrast this article with that of other vendors in the industry, you will see that my contribution is fair, impersonal, and does not highlight traits that would suggest Ultipa-sponsored content. I am here to learn and would like to contribute new articles even unrelated to this first contribution of mine, so if you have any suggestions, I will greatly appreciate them. As an example, I am urging the community to complete the editing of the "Vector Database" entry-I think that again, the Wikipedia reader deserves to learn about a technology that is becoming and will become increasingly important. Thanks! Yuri.simione (talk) 20:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultipa (October 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: None of the sources meet the WP:GNG standard (see talk page for analysis), therefore notability is not established. Given this and the multiple earlier declines for the same reason, I can only conclude that the subject is inherently non-notable, and therefore am rejecting rather than declining now.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yuri.simione! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ultipa Graph moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ultipa Graph. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 19:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultipa Graph (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Relativity was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sentences like "Performance and Scalability: Written in C++, Ultipa Graph is optimized for performance and scalability, catering to applications with large datasets and demanding processing requirements" read like advertisements, and should be reworded.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ultipa Graph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 04:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Completely eliminated the sentence that @Relativity recommended for rephrasing. The remaining text contains sufficient information and does not appear to be an advertisement. Yuri.simione (talk) 11:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultipa Graph (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NotAGenious was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ultipa Graph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NotAGenious (talk) 10:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ultipa Graph

Hello, Yuri.simione. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ultipa Graph, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ultipa Graph

Hello, Yuri.simione. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ultipa Graph".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:07, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]