User talk:YuelinLee1959

😅

Have you mind Sun Wukong Ispird by chines novel and chines novel inspird by Chinese travel and you read also mahakapi jataka monkey king also mention in maha Kapil jatak to please don't try to change again 😇 Ketanwasnik 098 (talk) 18:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just tell me where the original novel mentions the Mahakapi Jataka, which chapter, and write down the original text. If the original novel really mentions the Mahakapi Jataka, you should be able to point out the chapter and provide the exact text, right? YuelinLee1959 (talk) 06:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just say you've seen in some articles that the original novel mentions the Mahakapi Jataka. Whether it's Journey to the West or the Mahakapi Jataka, these books have been passed down, and you should be able to see the original text. If it does mention it, at least you should be able to cite which chapter it's mentioned in and what the exact original sentence is. YuelinLee1959 (talk) 06:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source replacement

Kindly stop replacing an on point academic source with a less reliable one. Thanks! MrOllie (talk) 14:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hobson, John M. (2004). The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge University Press, p. 103. This one is from Cambridge University Press. Should be a reliable source

Graff，David A. Medieval Chinese Warfare, London Routledge, also a reliable source YuelinLee1959 (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no problem, I will use these sources to edit YuelinLee1959 (talk) 05:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At this point (after having been reverted) you should be discussing potential changes on the article's talk page rather than repeatedly making the same edit. MrOllie (talk) 17:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Black Myth: Wukong and Game Science. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

You have made several disruptive edits on these articles. Despite getting reverted on your edits by multiple users, you have shown a repeated pattern to add your edits in again and again without consensus. --Cold Season (talk) 10:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only disputed edit is regarding Game Science. I don't revert any your edition related to Black Myth: Wukong now. For example, in your edit about Kang Jinlong, after you explained that "Kangjinlong" is the more standard name, I made no further changes and followed your edit completely. I simply changed "Kangjinlong" to "Kang Jin Loong," which is essentially the same term. In fact, "Loong" is the more standard spelling, and even on the Wikipedia page, it is written as "Loong."

So, the only disagreement is about Game Science. We have had no disputes regarding Black Myth: Wukong. As for Game Science, everything I wrote is merely a translation of the source YuelinLee1959 (talk) 11:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]