User talk:Yueer

I would object to deleting this page because Sneck is actually very significant to Chinese politics. She was a personal friend of Mao Zedong and one of the most prominent American Marxists to have moved to China to help liberate the country from the Nationalists. I interviewed her in person twice in Beijing just before she died. Her daughter Carma is also a very prominent filmmaker specializing in China. Sneck's story is little-known, even in China, but the role she played in the People's Republic is significant. Unfortunately, little secondary literature exists on her yet. The English page is largely a translation of the German Wikipedia site. Yueer (talk) 03:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Yueer, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bertha Sneck, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 08:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bertha Sneck

The article Bertha Sneck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"the 1st source wouldn't open for me, the second barely mentions her, and the third is a self-published remembrance from a Chinese person who met her and tells the story." White whirlwind. Agreed. Not notable. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 08:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 08:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC) Timestamp: 20160321083249 08:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bertha Sneck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bertha Sneck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertha Sneck until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 11:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Nyoman Tusthi Eddy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just moved the references from the Balinese page into the English page and put the author in a category. How does the page look now? Thanks, Yueer (talk) 20:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It does look a bit better, though I recommend adding a couple more references before moving the page back to mainspace. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nyoman Tusthi Eddy

Hello, Yueer

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Nyoman Tusthi Eddy, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: I have changed the citations and left comments in the talk section. I hope that you agree with keeping the article. Yueer (talk) 06:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Yueer. Thank you for your work on Nyoman Tusthi Eddy. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ľudovít Didi (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ľudovít Didi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 12:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Guessitsavis,

Thank you for your review. This English-language draft is essentially a translation of the original Slovak-language Wikipedia page at https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%BDudov%C3%ADt_Didi . If Wikipedia is to be consistent in its standards across all languages, it should also delete the Slovak page. I have nevertheless added an additional scholarly cite and should note that the Knižná revue is a publication by the Literature Information Center, a part of the Slovak Republic government's Ministry of Culture. Both the Knižná revue cite and the new one I added are reliable and are not published by the author himself, who is now dead. Didi was probably one of the two or three most important Romany authors ever to have written in Slovak, and he was posthumously recognized by the President of the Slovak Republic.

Many thanks,

Yueer Yueer (talk) 00:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yueer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 12:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ľudovít Didi has been accepted

Ľudovít Didi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette^Edit! 17:44, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Yueer (talk) 02:21, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from sk:Ľudovít_Didi to Ľudovít Didi. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]