User talk:NoGhost
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, NoGhost, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Regards, Accurizer 14:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
September 2008
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Desire line. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Alexf42 22:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, YubYub41. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dali Town, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xiaguan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Chola Mountains
- added a link pointing to Garze
- Hengduan Mountains
- added a link pointing to Dadu River
- Katok Monastery
- added a link pointing to Garze
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capital Regional District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saanich. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sichuan Basin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jin dynasty, Min River and Sichuanese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Transhimalayas
[edit]Hi NoGhost, I've been grouping high mountains by their major mountain range e.g. Alps, Andes, etc. I sense that there is no universally agreed definition of Transhimalayas but have taken the description of the Transhimalayas from the one given in the "Greater Ranges" which says it is the "the Nyanchen Tangla (or Transhimalaya) and various smaller mountain ranges inside Tibet and in western China (in the Tibet-Sichuan-Yunnan region, including Hengduan Mountains and Qionglai Shan)." However, if the sources commonly use another name for this group, we could use that instead. Bermicourt (talk) 07:58, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Bermicourt: Thanks for the response. Interesting, I hadn't seen that description and I've never heard of anything east of the Nyenchen Tanglha being included with the Transhimalaya before. For categorical purposes I think it's fine, recognizing that it's hard to classify mountains in this part of China into higher level groupings. I'll just caution that in China these higher-level categories don't exist and to be mindful of a potential Western-style designation of East Asian geography. Thanks. --NoGhost (talk) 20:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I was just going by the Wiki definition which, to be fair, that the grouping is the Transhimalayas plus other ranges, but doesn't give an overarching name. I guess there will be other mountains or ranges around the world that don't fit into the high level categories of the so-called Greater Ranges. Maybe we should add some words to the category to clarify that it includes ranges not generally considered part of the Transhimalayas? --Bermicourt (talk) 07:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Shangli Town
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. NoGhost, thanks for creating Shangli Town!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this, we have a shortage of articles on China's geography. Could you please just add your sources?
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 12:29, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Sichuan Basin evergreen broadleaf forests) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Sichuan Basin evergreen broadleaf forests, NoGhost!
Wikipedia editor NorthBySouthBaranof just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nicely done - important article.
To reply, leave a comment on NorthBySouthBaranof's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Lai Ning
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Lai Ning at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — fortunavelut luna 14:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for 1679 Sanhe-Pinggu earthquake
[edit]On 17 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1679 Sanhe-Pinggu earthquake, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although the 8.0Mw 1679 Sanhe-Pinggu earthquake devastated towns near Beijing, China, during the Qing dynasty, another large earthquake along this fault is not expected for 6,500 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1679 Sanhe-Pinggu earthquake. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1679 Sanhe-Pinggu earthquake), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 12:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Kangri Garpo
[edit]On 18 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kangri Garpo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Kangri Garpo mountain range contains the lowest-altitude glacier in Tibet? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kangri Garpo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kangri Garpo), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 12:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (1952 Damxung earthquake) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating 1952 Damxung earthquake, NoGhost!
Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Reviewed
To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
SamHolt6 (talk) 05:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Lai Ning
[edit]On 22 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lai Ning, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 14-year-old Lai Ning died fighting a forest fire in China in 1988 and was subsequently declared a revolutionary martyr? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lai Ning. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lai Ning), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Jinping Mountains
[edit]On 1 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jinping Mountains, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a hydroelectric diversion project and a dark matter research lab have been developed deep under the Jinping Mountains in Sichuan, China? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jinping Mountains. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jinping Mountains), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 04:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment to User:JohnBlackburne about title of article.
- The talk page of this article describes the reason why it was long ago moved to this title. The change reflected a consensus of the editors who had been involved in writing it. Recently User:NoGhost moved the article without changing its content or describing his reason for the move on the article's talk page. Consequently, I moved it back. Now you have moved it to where he had put it, again without adding to the page's content and without discussing the move on the article's talk page or my own talk page. Can you please explain why you have done this? Now the content of the article and the title no longer match. If you think it is inappropriate for the article to only describe the views of a single author, I can only agree. But the solution here is not to misrepresent the content with an inaccurate title, it is to diversify the content of the article.
Tibetologist (talk) 10:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Canan Bayram
[edit]On 16 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Canan Bayram, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Canan Bayram (pictured) was the only member of Alliance 90/The Greens directly elected to the German parliament in the 2017 election? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Canan Bayram. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Canan Bayram), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Precious
[edit]Chinese peaks
Thank you for quality articles on peaks, forests and rivers in East Asia, such as Paungda Danda and Guizhou Plateau broadleaf and mixed forests, for Canan Bayram, for moving articles to better names, for corrections with precise edit summaries, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1748 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Guizhou Plateau broadleaf and mixed forests
[edit]On 20 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Guizhou Plateau broadleaf and mixed forests, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Guizhou Plateau forests are prone to drought stress despite high rainfall in the region? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Guizhou Plateau broadleaf and mixed forests. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Guizhou Plateau broadleaf and mixed forests), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, NoGhost. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sichuan Basin
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sichuan Basin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sichuan Basin
[edit]The article Sichuan Basin you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sichuan Basin for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, NoGhost. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know# Monastery of Serra do Pilar in prep 2]]
[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know# Monastery of Serra do Pilar in prep 2]]. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Monastery of Serra do Pilar
[edit]On 27 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Monastery of Serra do Pilar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Portugal's Monastery of Serra do Pilar (church pictured) was designated a World Heritage Site in 1996? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Monastery of Serra do Pilar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Monastery of Serra do Pilar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]DYK nomination of C-9 (Cercanías Madrid)
[edit]Hello! Your submission of C-9 (Cercanías Madrid) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Harrias talk 11:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
New message from Narutolovehinata5
[edit]Message added 00:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Thank you for completing this DYK nomination! Apologies for being MIA, a lot came up in the last couple months and I've been inactive here. Much appreciated. I'll make sure not to leave a nomination hanging in limbo again. -NoGhost (talk) 21:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for C-9 (Cercanías Madrid)
[edit]On 2 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article C-9 (Cercanías Madrid), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although it is classified as a commuter rail line, Cercanías Madrid's C-9 line primarily serves ski resorts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/C-9 (Cercanías Madrid). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, C-9 (Cercanías Madrid)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
--valereee (talk) 00:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Republic of Haiti (1806–1820)
[edit]Hello! Since you created Republic of Haiti (1820–1849), would you be interested to create Republic of Haiti (1806–1820)? That article is missing, and its obviously needed, not just for the sake of consistency. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 04:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hello @Sundostund:, I had been putting off creating such a page for some time, but I see in my procrastination you've done it yourself! Thanks for picking up where I left off, much appreciated. Let me know if there's anything you would like me to help with on that page. -NoGhost (talk) 01:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hello! Its alright really, I've had some more time on my hand (I always have time for Wikipedia), so I decided to create that page myself. I'm really glad that you like how it turned out... I can only ask you to check it out, change/add/remove what you see as necessary, and generally try to make it as similar as possible to your work on Republic of Haiti (1820–1849). Cheers! — Sundostund (talk) 17:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Anarchism
[edit]Hi NoGhost,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 02:39, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit]Three years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Radio interview?
[edit]As a long-time BC Wikipedian, would you be open to a radio interview? A talk show host for a Filipino program, based out of Vancouver, is asking for someone to interview via phone or internet, pre-taped. -- Zanimum (talk) 02:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, MeLA, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Bergamo - San Vigilio funicular moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Bergamo - San Vigilio funicular, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, NoGhost
Thank you for creating Loja uprising.
User:MarioGom, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To facilitate verification, references to books should include page numbers where the relevant information can be found. Let me know if you need help formatting the references to add pages. Thank you!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MarioGom}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
MarioGom (talk) 20:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Photo
[edit]It seems the photo you are trying to put on the page of Jiujiang is fake, please don't do it. Thank you Gweilo60 (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Gweilo60: can you please elaborate, in what way is this photo [1] fake? I have reviewed all photos in the Commons Category for Jiujiang [2] and Jiujiang_city.jpg appears to be the best representative and most pertinent to the article's topic. If you feel this photo is doctored in some way or is fake by any other means, please advise and it may need to be removed from the Commons. I understand that you are attached to your photo [3] but you have not addressed any of my previous comments or suggestions surrounding MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE. You have also continually reverted edits without reaching consensus despite multiple warnings regarding WP:EDITWAR. There should be no need for arbitration on such a trivial matter and I would again encourage reaching consensus before making edits. Should the previously discussed photo not be accepted, I have identified the following 4 images as the next best photos representing the article topic: [4], [5], [6], or [7]. None of these are great and have some issues with quality, lighting, and framing, but if you think there is one that best represents the topic, I can add this to the article. Alternatively, I understand that you may be connected to Jiujiang so the best outcome could be if you're able to take a high quality and pertinent image to represent the city! -NoGhost (talk) 02:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @NoGhost:There are a few reasons I think you might not change it. The photo has been used for quite a long time and I think you are the only one want to change it?
- There is also no good substitute photo. I don't see any of the photos you mentioned above are genuine photos of Jiujiang. Maybe those photos shall all be removed.
- I don't really care if the original photo be changed. But I think the new photo should be genuine so can you please reach consensus before make any change?
- @Gweilo60: I have tried explaining numerous times regarding MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE but it's becoming clear you're just looking for an excuse to peacock your own photo even though it does not even come close to representing the article topic. You have now claimed that somehow all photos in the Commons category [8] are not "genuine" without any explanation. Please refrain from reverting until you have addressed the previously noted issues, and I would again encourage you to take a more topical photo of Jiujiang if you live in the area! NoGhost (talk) 23:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
19/07/2022
[edit]If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards. If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Gweilo60 (talk) 01:09, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit]Five years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)