User talk:Ytrezq

May 2023

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 17:57, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ytrezq, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 17:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, we’re a group of over 1000 users which include Roman Semenov (1 of the original developpers) who think that the article says is in great part, wrong. Having reliable links is important in order to avoid users being scammed when they search for sources. Outside what was sized by the sanctions, we’re not a fork : we’re using the same funds and the shareholders and even the same ɪᴘꜰꜱ website as before the sanctions. It’s true the old team disbanded, but you can’t censor an [[1]] that continued allocating funds for the project to developers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ytrezq (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia requires sourcing, you will not be able to change the article until reliable sources (such as mainstream news outlets, not crypto blogs) take notice of these changes. Also see WP:COI, if you are involved with this 'group' you should not be editing the article yourself. - MrOllie (talk) 20:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, hence WP:Village_pump_(policy)#Add_on‑chain_activity_to_WP:RS. Though the current situation is like being declared dead on Wikipedia : you edit the article yourself in order to explain why it’s wrong. Think as Tornado Cash editing it’s own Wikipedia article. Ideally, to avoid promotion, the article should be deleted.

Otherwise, we’re not doing promotion by stating less than 50% of the transferred funds are linked to money laundering or that companies like the Graph even went as far as censoring statistical data about usage. Ytrezq (talk) 21:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. SN54129 15:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I invited techical peoples to talk on this issue (the opinion that a registration off chain changes everything related to equivalent document off‑chain or not related to cryto). Therefore the closure is prematured. Please wait. Ytrezq (talk) 15:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

MrOllie (talk) 20:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do this.

[2] Editing while logged out (or acting in a similar manner in order to hide your account) while proposing a change in policy in regard to which you have a clear conflict of interest (per your above comments) is entirely impermissible. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:44, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This block is made under and logged therefore of the authority of Wikipedia:General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies for your violations of editing standards. Courcelles (talk) 16:00, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ytrezq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

Your long, rambling, and largely irrelevant unblock request convinces me the block is correct. PhilKnight (talk) 03:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock for no longer editing the article.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ytrezq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Although I maintain my stance the info is wrong, I won t edit Tornado Cash Again even with non crypto sourcing and thus won t continue to cause damage or disruption. The usefull contribution I d like to do is to I d like to add National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to Template:Conspiracy_theories since it s a key to turn peoples to vaccine skeptics that was enough for example enough to turn some Trump cabinets picks https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/31/us/politics/trump-rfk-jr-vaccine-skepticism.html. I also tell I created that account more than a decade ago without creating problems as you can see in my contribution history and that I will resume on that basis

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Although I maintain my stance the info is wrong, I won t edit Tornado Cash Again even with non crypto sourcing '''and thus won t continue to cause damage or disruption'''. The usefull contribution I d like to do is to I d like to add National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to Template:Conspiracy_theories since it s a key to turn peoples to vaccine skeptics that was enough for example enough to turn some Trump cabinets picks https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/31/us/politics/trump-rfk-jr-vaccine-skepticism.html. I also tell I created that account more than a decade ago without creating problems as you can see in my contribution history and that I will resume on that basis |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Although I maintain my stance the info is wrong, I won t edit Tornado Cash Again even with non crypto sourcing '''and thus won t continue to cause damage or disruption'''. The usefull contribution I d like to do is to I d like to add National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to Template:Conspiracy_theories since it s a key to turn peoples to vaccine skeptics that was enough for example enough to turn some Trump cabinets picks https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/31/us/politics/trump-rfk-jr-vaccine-skepticism.html. I also tell I created that account more than a decade ago without creating problems as you can see in my contribution history and that I will resume on that basis |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Although I maintain my stance the info is wrong, I won t edit Tornado Cash Again even with non crypto sourcing '''and thus won t continue to cause damage or disruption'''. The usefull contribution I d like to do is to I d like to add National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to Template:Conspiracy_theories since it s a key to turn peoples to vaccine skeptics that was enough for example enough to turn some Trump cabinets picks https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/31/us/politics/trump-rfk-jr-vaccine-skepticism.html. I also tell I created that account more than a decade ago without creating problems as you can see in my contribution history and that I will resume on that basis |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}