User talk:YticagaS

September 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in St. Edmund's College, Shillong, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List

Hi it is regarding this edit. When lists within articles get big enough, the process is to create a List per procedure and not a category. Unlike a list article, you can not have descriptions and sources in categories, though the latter has its own uses. I think you should create a list article and restores the sources in it. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of sourced contents

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Dzuko Valley, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Haoreima (talk) 15:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:The Anonymous Earthling per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Anonymous Earthling. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 11:16, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]