User talk:Youssef khedhri 2011

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at List of wars involving Tunisia. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Youssef khedhri 2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Article did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! R Prazeres (talk) 01:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian civil war (1675-1679) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tunisian civil war (1675-1679). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Banu Khazrun, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bro i didn't say this flags were original im just saying every state should have a flag representing it or how can i post on my tiktok secondly what is your problem with that im gonna explain it's imaginary flags what ever leave me alone now and chill why would you block me i even stopped Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 15:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of kef (1746) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of kef (1746). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources need to be reliable and independent. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian Civil War (1728-1756) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tunisian Civil War (1728-1756). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:47, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Algerian Invasion of Tunis (1705) and Battle of Tunis (1705) Pages need to be deleted

Hi, I have seen your really recent newly created pages about the the conflict between the Regeny of Algiers and Ottoman Tunisia in 1705, altought i like the work, this conflict already has a page called "Tunisian–Algerian War (1705)", i also recommend you to delete the "Battle of Tunis (1705)" page that u made too because of the name, it was a siege and not a battle, i suppose that you are pretty new and young (Judging by your name) so i would recommend you to learn more about how to create/edit pages in wikipedia. Souma.dz (talk) 00:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi thank you for explaining but first in Battle of Majaz al-Bab (1705) algerian army lost and escaped secondly according to the sources in have it was a battle not a siege and it ended with the algerian army losing then escaping to majaz al-bab where they lost again and finally i didn't know the Tunisian–Algerian War (1705) existed so im gonna delete my page but i have to change that the war ended with a tunisian victory ad a peace treaty Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 22:25, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate the fact that you responded to my message, I understand your view about the Battle of Majaz al-Bab but i would like to make the result as algerian victory of that doesnt bother, because the sources i use are the best one in my opinion and the most detailed about the topic, if putting algerian victory in the result section in fact does bother you i propose that we just link it to the Aftermath of the battle or simply just put inconclusive in it.

for the "Battle of Tunis (1705)" however i heavily recommend you to delete it as well as the Algierians put the city under siege (if you are not familiar with the term i suggest you to look it up on Google). but i advise you to not change the result for the page that i created Tunisian–Algerian War (1705) and leaving it as it is. i hope you comprehend and understand my statements, if you got something to say answer me when you can.

what would it look like :

Tunisian–Algerian War (1705)

Battle of Kef (1705) Algerian Victory (im going to create this page soon just so you know)
Siege of Tunis (1705) Peace Treaty
Battle of Majaz al-Bab (1705) Inconclusive

Souma.dz (talk) 19:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well me too i see my sources as a better sources but like that were not gonna reach anyhting so let's put it as inconclusive im ok with. and abou thebattle of kef and Siege of Tunis (1705) ok do what ever you want with them, but keep my page for Battle of Tunis (1705) because it's a second view of the war, you can mention that or im gonna accept if we put it in your Siege of Tunis (1705) page as a heading Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 23:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do as you wich 👍, thx for answering Souma.dz (talk) 18:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Kairouan (1348)

Hello, Youssef khedhri 2011,

Thank you for creating Battle of Kairouan (1348).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Most of this article repeats information we already have in other articles. Almost nothing here us about the battle itself and most of that isn’t sourced.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello, @Mccapra:

Thank you for informing me with thos issues

I hope you will give me the repeated information in other articles, although it will be very difficult to create a page for the Battle of Kairouan without this information, because it is important to understand the battle and the reasons that led to it.

Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 21:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Taifa of Granada, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 09:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

don't block me just like you did before you can talk to me easily and im gonna answer why anger Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 10:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the "official religion" of the Taifas to Shia Islam is completely baseless, as anyone with basic familiarity with the topic would know, and you provided zero sources to support these fringe claims. You were warned about original research already above. You are being warned again. R Prazeres (talk) 10:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok calm down why are criying you can fix it i don't have problem with that. and don't message me again please you blocked my old account i don't want to talk you so leave me alone Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 10:39, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"You blocked my old account". Which account are your referring to? I'm not an administrator so I don't have the ability to block anyone. R Prazeres (talk) 10:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AK0934 that was the account im reffering to , well we had a problem in the List of wars involving Tunisia and you rejected that i added carthage and vandals, aghlabids,fatimids,zirids you were deleting my work and i thaught there was a problem in the site so i kept putting my work again and i was banned for sbamming i made a new account just before months (don't report me) Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 10:53, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you talk to User:Blablubbs to ask wikipedia to remove my block Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 16:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why would you do that i was wrong im sorry please i want to edit in wikipedia im sorry please stop this please Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 15:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

im not using multiple accounts in the same time AK0934 is banned there is no chance to get it back you are wrong im using one account Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 15:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you request to stop my block this is a misunderstanding the whole thing Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 15:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

at least tell me how to remove the block or to contact wikipedia Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 16:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Youssef khedhri 2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im really so sorry in my old account i didn't know wikipedia rules that was a year ago i tried to fix anything and make myself a new account i don't want be banned for ever please wikipedia forgive me i didn't do anything wrong in this account the other one was from an old time im beggging you to stop this block i would never do anything wrong again please im really sorry forgive me Youssef khedhri 2011 (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll need to request unblock from your original account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The problem is, "I didn't do anything wrong," is not true. When your account is blocked, you the person is blocked, not just a single account; a block would be pretty meaningless if a blocked editor was entitled to simply start a new account every time their account was blocked. Once your account was blocked in February, you were not entitled to make edits on any account, on any computer, anywhere in the world. By using another account to circumvent a block on the other account, you were violating Wikipedia's sockpuppet policies. You made 90 edits on this account since your account was blocked, so every single one of those 90 edits was inappropriate. In addition, a number of these inappropriate edits had to be reverted for being unsourced and poorly written, which raises additional concerns about your ability to contribute constructively to English Wikipedia. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 16:07, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my misunderstanding of Wikipedia's policies regarding blocked accounts. I now understand that when an account is blocked, the person is also blocked, and creating or using another account to edit is against the rules. I genuinely regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused. My intention was never to violate Wikipedia's policies or disrupt the community. I created the new account because I wanted to continue contributing positively, not to circumvent the block. I realize now that this was a mistake, and I am truly sorry for any unsourced or poorly written edits I made. I am committed to learning from this experience and improving my contributions to Wikipedia. I respectfully request another chance to demonstrate my commitment to following Wikipedia's guidelines. If unblocked, I will ensure that all my future edits are constructive, properly sourced, and in line with Wikipedia's standards. Youssef khedhri 2011 (Talk) 5 August 2024

Hi josh Gordon or --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} thanks for guiding me and helping me Thank you for your guidance and help. I hope you accept my request to remove the block. Youssef khedhri 2011 talk