User talk:YourJudge
A belated welcome!
[edit]Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, YourJudge! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Wikipedia:Task Center.
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks YourJudge (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Thank you for your work on the Emperor Concerto — one of my favorite piano concertos. GeneralPoxter (talk • contribs) 02:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I took some sources and modeled some of it from the Piano Sonata No. 31, so, thank you as well. YourJudge (talk) 16:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi YourJudge! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi YourJudge! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
What are you up to?
[edit]I wanted to say hi! Takedalullaby (talk) 19:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello there wanderer! YourJudge (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Suggestion
[edit]Your artcile [[Piano Concerto No. 5 (Beethoven)] could be posted for a GA upgrade and after approval as GA you could immediately come back and post it on DYK.Nvvchar. 15:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Do you think the DYK would have been accepted if it fulfilled that requirement? YourJudge (talk) 22:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Spinoza
[edit]I want to compliment you on your edits on the Spinoza article. I think those edits of the lead were (and perhaps still are) more than necessary (just like the rest of the article), since it was one big mess (with sentences that didn't follow from the reference and stuff like that). The lead could still be improved I think (there's no mention of Spinoza's two most important works, which is weird); perhaps I will do this in the future myself if someone doesn't do it before me. Thanks again! GoneWithThePuffery (talk) 16:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)