User talk:Yoseffeldman123

Welcome, Yoseffeldman123!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Yoseffeldman123! I'm I dream of horses, and I've been assigned as your mentor. Around 10% of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor randomly taken from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 14:31, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

As you by now you may know I’m mainly interested in editing the falsehoods regarding myself and also adding some positive aspects 49.195.21.192 (talk) 01:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Yoseffeldman123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Yossi Feldman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.
Also, did you edit that page before creating your account? Closhund /talk/ 16:31, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll look into what you mentioned in a few hours

Im just really upset that just negatives are written about myself and also total misrepresentations based on fake media and tabloid but not the real truth, which only I know and those who really know who have discussed the issues with me. This negative article has affected my livelihood and some of my children’s marriage opportunities and it’s very serious for me 49.195.21.192 (talk) 23:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Contact us/Article subjects, Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects#The information in your article about me is wrong. How can I get it fixed?, Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects#Someone keeps writing negative things about me or my company. What can I do?, and Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects#I keep making a change in my article and somebody keeps changing it back. Why? may also be worthy reads. Courtesy ping for Closhund. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 00:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm not liking these Twinkle templates very much, so I might stop using them soon. Because Yosef responded to my COI notice as an IP and because that IP is the last edit on his article, should I revert it? It's getting edit-warry and I don't want to get into a dispute. Or should I just let it go? Closhund /talk/ 04:40, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Closhund Unfortunately, the COI template is the best we have; sometimes, it's second to {{subst:welcome-coi}}. Perhaps if you have a better way of phrasing things in a way that prompts a discussion, you can make a proposal on the talk page of the template. I doubt that anyone will respond, but if anyone does, given this is a template used by Twinkle (and thereby, widely used), you'll be glad you used a "discuss first" approach.

After looking everything over, I might revert it to the last/second-to-last stable version (it is reliably referenced, after all), but I do have concerns over WP:WEIGHT. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 19:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This what I wrote to the Visa Dep when they questioned me re my resident return visa (I’m a US citizen) because of the articles

Hi Sherry

Im writing now in response very quickly and briefly as I’m very upset that these articles are being used against me very unfairly, since they’re only newspaper articles which can be biased, exaggerated and totally out of context, like these ones with myself. I’m shocked how a Gov investigation into a visa can be based on newspaper articles. Do all the daily negative articles re the Gov necessarily represent the truth??? I certainly didn’t commit any crime with these issues and to the contrary; the judge in the Polaris case (one of the two defamation cases that concluded which I lost) wrote that it wasn’t fair reporting re myself as I clearly emphasised that all of these issues are abhorrent according to Jewish law and my life. I’ll elaborate further with links at a later time and also get my lawyers to write.

The main journalist who wrote the original post re this issue who was from the AJN (Polaris Media) and publicised it to the journalist at Nationwide (Herald Sun) and to the other journalists, was an enemy of religious Judaism. He told my brother Rabbi Eli Feldman that he wants to go against all Rabbis. He took the noted question and my answer mentioned in this issue and totally ignored the actual question and what was said before and after.

I’m sure you’re aware of the concept of ‘Fake News’ re the media.

The Royal Commission itself didn’t make this adverse finding re sexual touching.

Please check their website re case 22

This is the link

https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-studies/case-study-22-yeshiva-bondi-and-yeshivah-melbourne

Please also look at my submission there to respond to that and other issues from Council assisting. The Commissioners rejected most of what the CA wrote based on my submission including with this issue.

I began defamations cases against all the papers

Most including The Guardian settled with me with some decent financial settlements. ABC and IBT settled by also putting out statements that I never said what’s quoted re sexual touching.

Please see editors note at end of article

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-06/rabbi-did-not-have-a-clue-an-adult-touching-a-child-was-illegal/6076796

In 2 cases which concluded, because of legal technicalities and the other side having the most experienced lawyers in the country and my lawyer was doing it for free as his first defamation case... I didn’t ultimately succeed with those defamation cases, but only after an intense case over many days and with judgements of close to a hundred pages and appeals which were accepted but again failed on technical grounds after much analysis. Also accordingly they needed to spend close to a million dollars each on lawyers with risk of and actually receiving no compensation. So they both lost from that perspective and from my perspective from G-d including that the main journalist died suddenly soon after not wanting to retract. But the judges did say some nice things about my character especially in the Nationwide case.

I only resigned because of perception as elaborated on in the Nationwide case.

The title is natural justice so please do so by not relying on trash newspaper articles who are in it not for truth and justice but to be dramatic and make money and especially with this extremely sensitive issue.

Please respond to this email ASAP

Kind Regards,

Rabbi Yosef 49.195.21.192 (talk) 01:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Address the COI

Removing sourced material on an article about yourself after being told you need to tread carefully is not acceptable. Please read the COI guidelines and the other pages linked to you above. Closhund /talk/ 00:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sourced material are from fake media and tabloids. That’s not sourced. Like I wrote quoting from the Royal Commission website or from actual court proceedings are sourced all the rest aren’t. I’m once again removing Yoseffeldman123 (talk) 12:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sources being used aren't considered to be unreliable by the Wikipedian community. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 17:32, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read again what I wrote to the Aus Gov visa department why in my case it’s different.They accepted that. Even the ABC wrote a clarification which is not brought by whoever wrote the article. There are many other points in my favour in court proceedings which aren’t brought.

Regarding helping an abuser leave this is false and the Commission confirmed that.

Regarding Ponzi scheme it’s simply a lie and it’s source is a blog. I can go through other points.

The one who was the source of the articles was an enemy and hence the article and accordingly other media outlets.

Also my father is still officially the head of Chabad in Sydney. I obviously know the truth and could go through point by point regarding the truth and many with sources an example is the helping abuser to leave which the Royal Commission rejected, at a later time. 49.186.114.26 (talk) 21:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I wrote to the Gov and they accepted it

Hi Sherry

Im writing now in response very quickly and briefly as I’m very upset that these articles are being used against me very unfairly, since they’re only newspaper articles which can be biased, exaggerated and totally out of context, like these ones with myself. I’m shocked how a Gov investigation into a visa can be based on newspaper articles. Do all the daily negative articles re the Gov necessarily represent the truth??? I certainly didn’t commit any crime with these issues and to the contrary; the judge in the Polaris case (one of the two defamation cases that concluded which I lost) wrote that it wasn’t fair reporting re myself as I clearly emphasised that all of these issues are abhorrent according to Jewish law and my life. I’ll elaborate further with links at a later time and also get my lawyers to write.

The main journalist who wrote the original post re this issue who was from the AJN (Polaris Media) and publicised it to the journalist at Nationwide (Herald Sun) and to the other journalists, was an enemy of religious Judaism. He told my brother Rabbi Eli Feldman that he wants to go against all Rabbis. He took the noted question and my answer mentioned in this issue and totally ignored the actual question and what was said before and after.

I’m sure you’re aware of the concept of ‘Fake News’ re the media.

The Royal Commission itself didn’t make this adverse finding re sexual touching.

Please check their website re case 22

This is the link

https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-studies/case-study-22-yeshiva-bondi-and-yeshivah-melbourne

Please also look at my submission there to respond to that and other issues from Council assisting. The Commissioners rejected most of what the CA wrote based on my submission including with this issue.

I began defamations cases against all the papers

Most including The Guardian settled with me with some decent financial settlements. ABC and IBT settled by also putting out statements that I never said what’s quoted re sexual touching.

Please see editors note at end of article

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-06/rabbi-did-not-have-a-clue-an-adult-touching-a-child-was-illegal/6076796

In 2 cases which concluded, because of legal technicalities and the other side having the most experienced lawyers in the country and my lawyer was doing it for free as his first defamation case... I didn’t ultimately succeed with those defamation cases, but only after an intense case over many days and with judgements of close to a hundred pages and appeals which were accepted but again failed on technical grounds after much analysis. Also accordingly they needed to spend close to a million dollars each on lawyers with risk of and actually receiving no compensation. So they both lost from that perspective and from my perspective from G-d including that the main journalist died suddenly soon after not wanting to retract. But the judges did say some nice things about my character especially in the Nationwide case.

I only resigned because of perception as elaborated on in the Nationwide case.

The title is natural justice so please do so by not relying on trash newspaper articles who are in it not for truth and justice but to be dramatic and make money and especially with this extremely sensitive issue.

Please respond to this email ASAP

Kind Regards,

Rabbi Yosef

P.S. Meanwhile I received your next email and I’ll fill out whatever’s missing once I get all that info. I didn’t think it was necessary as they are all Australian Citizens. Sorry for that. Yoseffeldman123 (talk) 21:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What I wrote to the Gov

Hi Sherry

Im writing now in response very quickly and briefly as I’m very upset that these articles are being used against me very unfairly, since they’re only newspaper articles which can be biased, exaggerated and totally out of context, like these ones with myself. I’m shocked how a Gov investigation into a visa can be based on newspaper articles. Do all the daily negative articles re the Gov necessarily represent the truth??? I certainly didn’t commit any crime with these issues and to the contrary; the judge in the Polaris case (one of the two defamation cases that concluded which I lost) wrote that it wasn’t fair reporting re myself as I clearly emphasised that all of these issues are abhorrent according to Jewish law and my life. I’ll elaborate further with links at a later time and also get my lawyers to write.

The main journalist who wrote the original post re this issue who was from the AJN (Polaris Media) and publicised it to the journalist at Nationwide (Herald Sun) and to the other journalists, was an enemy of religious Judaism. He told my brother Rabbi Eli Feldman that he wants to go against all Rabbis. He took the noted question and my answer mentioned in this issue and totally ignored the actual question and what was said before and after.

I’m sure you’re aware of the concept of ‘Fake News’ re the media.

The Royal Commission itself didn’t make this adverse finding re sexual touching.

Please check their website re case 22

This is the link

https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-studies/case-study-22-yeshiva-bondi-and-yeshivah-melbourne

Please also look at my submission there to respond to that and other issues from Council assisting. The Commissioners rejected most of what the CA wrote based on my submission including with this issue.

I began defamations cases against all the papers

Most including The Guardian settled with me with some decent financial settlements. ABC and IBT settled by also putting out statements that I never said what’s quoted re sexual touching.

Please see editors note at end of article

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-06/rabbi-did-not-have-a-clue-an-adult-touching-a-child-was-illegal/6076796

In 2 cases which concluded, because of legal technicalities and the other side having the most experienced lawyers in the country and my lawyer was doing it for free as his first defamation case... I didn’t ultimately succeed with those defamation cases, but only after an intense case over many days and with judgements of close to a hundred pages and appeals which were accepted but again failed on technical grounds after much analysis. Also accordingly they needed to spend close to a million dollars each on lawyers with risk of and actually receiving no compensation. So they both lost from that perspective and from my perspective from G-d including that the main journalist died suddenly soon after not wanting to retract. But the judges did say some nice things about my character especially in the Nationwide case.

I only resigned because of perception as elaborated on in the Nationwide case.

The title is natural justice so please do so by not relying on trash newspaper articles who are in it not for truth and justice but to be dramatic and make money and especially with this extremely sensitive issue.

Please respond to this email ASAP

Kind Regards,

Rabbi Yosef

P.S. Meanwhile I received your next email and I’ll fill out whatever’s missing once I get all that info. I didn’t think it was necessary as they are all Australian Citizens. Sorry for that. 49.186.43.225 (talk) 23:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did remove a bit of information that was referenced to the telegraph. The jwire seems a bit iffy as well, but they seem to be undergoing editorial oversight, which is ultimately the important thing. However, the ABC and SBS sources seem more reliable. The case report says the court system ruled against you/for the defendant with the defamation cases, and a similar report says you were naive, not of whether or not sexual abuse, but of mandatory reporting laws. The article does acknowledge you received an apology from a media outlet. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 23:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you or someone complained about me with a COI so now I’m not allowed to edit😞

Why cant you add that the abc also clarified the issue. Please Check the link

Also please delete the Ponzi scheme which its source is a blog of someone who was just out to attack our sect and is simply not true

Also I really don’t know why my financial status is relevant especially since it had to do with a debt to our organisation to pay that guy for his salary etc of which the principal was repaid and that whole amount was outrageous interest...

Please delete it

Why can’t you also refer to the Royal Commission website if anyone wants to see the truth 49.186.43.225 (talk) 02:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you or someone complained about me with a COI so now I’m not allowed to edit😞

Why cant you add that the abc also clarified the issue. Please Check the link

Also please delete the Ponzi scheme which its source is a blog of someone who was just out to attack our sect and is simply not true

Also I really don’t know why my financial status is relevant especially since it had to do with a debt to our organisation to pay that guy for his salary etc of which the principal was repaid and that whole amount was outrageous interest...

Please delete it

Why can’t you also refer to the Royal Commission website if anyone wants to see the truth 49.186.43.225 (talk) 02:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 49.186.43.225 (talk) 02:09, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you planning to respond to my latest post? Yoseffeldman123 (talk) 23:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, people get Wikipedia articles because they're noted, and you are noted for controversial reasons. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 16:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issue with that but in my case it was just sensationalist journalism and unwarranted hype by one hateful journalist making a mountain from a molehill!

Either way you didn’t respond to my real points. Please accordingly do the just and right thing by me

Thank you 49.180.183.71 (talk) 04:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issue with that but in my case it was just sensationalist journalism and unwarranted hype by one hateful journalist making a mountain from a molehill!

Either way you didn’t respond to my real points. Please accordingly do the just and right thing by me

Thank you Yoseffeldman123 (talk) 05:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pinchus Feldman without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s irrelevant info 49.180.183.71 (talk) 05:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also its missing latest info 49.180.183.71 (talk) 05:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Pinchus Feldman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The content appears to be well-sourced and has been replaced by unsourced assertions and personal opinion ("and are thank god thriving"). You have been repeatedly informed that you need to use caution when removing well-sourced information. The fact that the subject and your username share a name raises additional concerns of a conflict of interest. Please stop and read up before continuing to edit pages with which you may have a conflict of interest. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop bullying

Info which was private and mainly regarding others shouldn’t be there. Similarly financial issues of such a nature is also irrelevant and just for unnecessary sensationalism.

Also the added info is the reality presently 49.180.0.56 (talk) 07:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to self-revert that. Closhund /talk/ 21:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Pinchus Feldman while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]