User talk:Ynyrhesolaf

Welcome!

Hello, Ynyrhesolaf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Croeso. I'm interested to know where you got the 1215 date for Dafydd ap Llywelyn's birth? Deb (talk) 18:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dafydd ap Llywelyn's birth

S'mae Deb. The birth date comes from J. Beverley Smith's article on Dafydd in the latest edition of the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Hope that helps. Ynyrhesolaf (talk) 21:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see. The Dictionary of Welsh Biography gives c.1208, but of course that's quite old - does the DNB give any supporting evidence for the other date? Must remember to look at the new Encyclopaedia when I get home. Deb (talk) 11:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is known for certain that Dafydd could not have been born earlier than 1211; but the estimate is based on the conjecture that, as Dafydd's first surviving charter was issued in February 1229, he must have been born no later than February 1215 (as one could only issue charters from the age of fourteen onwards). J. B. Smith based his estimate on this theory. In any case, the DWB is, as you say, out of date on this point! Ynyrhesolaf (talk) 17:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see the new Encyclopedia gives c. 1215. How do they know he couldn't have been born before 1211? Deb (talk) 17:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A clause in the agreement signed by Llywelyn and King John in August 1211 contains a clause that implies Llywelyn had not sired an heir by his wife Joan at that time. Presumably J. E. Lloyd - who (if memory serves) wrote the DWB article - was not aware of the existence of this document, or failed to make this inference. Ynyrhesolaf (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's interesting. A gap in my knowledge (let's face it, there are plenty of those!). Deb (talk) 17:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Madog

Good point on today's effort. Don;t know how I missed that when I looked at it! Thanks --Snowded TALK 10:17, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No bother. I updated Madog's page a few days back. One might include a reference to Llywelyn Bren's revolt in 1316 too, but it was not Wales-wide - only confined to Glamorgan and Gwent. Good article tho! Ynyrhesolaf (talk) 08:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dafydd ap Llywelyn's birthplace

Hi! I was wondering how can we be sure Dafydd was born in Castell Hen Blas, Coleshill, Bagillt in Flintshire? I'm working on his life for my university studies in France and I never found any mention to that castle and the Dafydd's birthplace... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.28.135.46 (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Brigyn

I have nominated Brigyn, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigyn. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Magioladitis (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rhys ap Robert

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rhys ap Robert, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://fabpedigree.com/s000/f688128.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:25, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Owain Glyndŵr

Hi, this edit may be entirely legitimate, but you did two things that made it look like illegitimate: you checked the "minor edit" box when it wasn't a minor edit, and you gave no edit summary, explaining why you were removing the words. For these reasons, I've reverted your edit. If you think it should stand, then just take the words out again, but don't call it a minor edit, and (most importantly) explain why you're making the edit. A note on the article talk page may be helpful too. Thanks! garik (talk) 15:13, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The best thing to do is to make Isabel ferch Gruffudd Fychan a redirect to Isabel ferch Gruffudd. Just create the page with "#REDIRECT [[Isabel ferch Gruffudd]]" as the only content. Another useful trick, although unnecessary in this case, is to create a link with a bar, like this: [[Isabel ferch Gruffudd|the sister of Owain Glyndŵr]] (don't forget, by the way, to include the to bach on the w in his name. You can get accents from the box under the edit window, by selecting "Latin" from the options on the left). That will produce the following link: the sister of Owain Glyndŵr. I hope that helps! garik (talk) 18:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Isabel ferch Gruffudd

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Isabel ferch Gruffudd has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 18:12, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NOTDIRECTORY #2. Genealogical entries: JohnCD (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ynyrhesolaf. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Acts of Welsh Rulers

Hi Ynyrhesolaf. I noticed that you've used as a source the book Acts of Welsh Rulers. I wonder if you still have a copy of it handy. One of the sources of an article I'm working on cites that particular book for a certain Welsh document which is covered in Acts of Welsh Rulers (no. 317; page 490). I was hoping that if you've got the book handy could you look up that page and tell me if the document is a charter, or a letter, or something. All I know is that it covers a transaction between Llywelyn ap Gruffydd (d. 1282) and Ralph de Mortimer (d. 1246), concerning the lands of Maelienydd and Gwerthrynion; and that it is dated to 1241. My source just calls it "an important document", and an editor wants me describe it better.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 07:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That does help me. Thank you very much! :)--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dolgellau

Bore da, Ynyrhesolaf. I noted your edit to Dolgellau and reverted it; i wanted to let you know why: The reference you removed did cover the statement made in the article. As soon as i've finished here i'm going back to it and tweak the wording to make it even more accurate; cheers, Lindsay^Hello 11:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

S'mae Lindsay - gobeithio eich bod chi'n cadw'n iawn!

I changed the original because it is incorrect to say that Dolgellau is the oldest club in Wales, but even with the article as it stands, my main objection to the description of Dolgellau even as 'one of the oldest clubs in Wales' is that it makes the club sound exceptional. Even if one limits the geographical scope to north Wales, there are over a dozen clubs that were formed before Dolgellau - some of the more well known include Wrexham, Mold and Llangollen, all of which predate Dolgellau by over a quarter of a century, and Bangor, Holyhead and Beaumaris, which were formed in the 1850s. The wording is now 'one of the oldest', which means it's in the eye of the beholder, I suppose; but even so, there must be dozens of clubs in the south that predate it. If Dolgellau can make this claim, so can any number of other clubs. I'd appreciate your thoughts. Ynyrhesolaf (talk) 18:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind, really, either way. My point is that the reference itself indicates that it is one of the oldest in Wales, which is why i put it back ~ it was substantiated by the ref; on the other hand, the more important/interesting point is who founded it, which is also substantiated by the reference, so i added it to the article. By all means, let's take out the "earliness" of the Club, but leave in Temple. As a side note, did he have any other links with Dolgellau or North Wales, do you know? That might be something interesting to develop. I took a quick look at his article and didn't see anything, but was in rather a hurry at the time. Thanks for responding; cheers, Lindsay^Hello 11:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cricket in Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hanmer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of solar eclipses visible from the United Kingdom AD 1000–2091, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Kilda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ynyrhesolaf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glan Clwyd Hospital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jade Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ynyrhesolaf. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]