User talk:Ykqkwywkrh
June 2021
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dan Vs. have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dan Vs. was changed by Ykqkwywkrh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97295 on 2021-06-03T14:25:18+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC) Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cicis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gary the Rat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC) Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 7-Eleven, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pizza Hut, you may be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dan Vs.. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC) This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dan Vs., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:48, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Ykqkwywkrh, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Ykqkwywkrh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC) |
June 2021
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.