Jump to content

User talk:Yellow Evan/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2012/Submissions/Yellow Evan

[edit]

Hi, just a little thing- I'm afraid I've had to remove Talk:Hurricane Hernan (1996)/GA1 from your submission page. While I do feel that it was appropriate for you to take over the review and to fail the article, I do not feel that you did much by way of actually reviewing, and so I do not think it is eligible for points in the Cup. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks, J Milburn (talk) 14:15, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding- I've added some notes to the scoring page. J Milburn (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

[edit]

WikiCup 2012 April newsletter

[edit]

Round 2 of this year's WikiCup is over, and so we are down to our final 32, in what could be called our quarter-finals. The two highest scorers from each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers overall, have entered round 3, while 30 participants have been eliminated. Pool B's Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions) remains our top scorer with over 700 points; he continues to gain high numbers of points for his good articles on The X-Files, but also Millennium and other subjects. He has also gained points for a good topic, a featured list, multiple good article reviews and several did you knows. Pool E's Scotland Casliber (submissions) was second, thanks primarily to his biology articles, with Pool H's New York City Muboshgu (submissions) coming in third, with an impressive 46 did you knows, mostly on the subject of baseball. Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both scored over 600 points. Pools E and H proved our most successful, with each seeing 5 members qualify for round 3, while Pools C and D were the least, with each seeing only 3 reach round 3. However, it was Pool G which saw the lowest scoring, with a little under 400 points combined; Pool H, the highest scoring group, saw over triple that score.

65 points was the lowest qualifying score for round 3; significantly higher than the 11 required to enter round 2, and also higher than the 41 required to reach round 3 last year. However, in 2010, 100 points were needed to secure a place in round 3. 16 will progress to round 4. In round 3, 150 points was the 16th highest score, though, statistically, people tend to up their game a little in later rounds. Last year, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 points were needed. Guessing how many points will be required is not easy. We still have not seen any featured portals or topics this year, but, on the subject of less common content types, a small correction needs to be made to the previous newsletter: File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg, our first featured picture, was the work of both Vanuatu Matthewedwards (submissions) and United Kingdom Grandiose (submissions), the latter of whom has also gone on to score with File:Map of the Battle of Guam, 1944.svg. Bonus points also continue to roll in; this round, England Ealdgyth (submissions) earned triple points for her good articles on William the Conqueror and the Middle Ages, Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both earned triple points for their work on Western Jackdaw, now a good article, Michigan Dana Boomer (submissions) earned triple points for her work on lettuce and work by Bavaria Stone (submissions) to ready antimony for good article status earned him triple points. United Kingdom Jarry1250 (submissions) managed to expand Vitus Bering far enough for a did you know, which was also worth triple points. All of these highly important topics featured on 50 or more Wikipedias at the start of the year.

An article on the WikiCup in the Wikimedia Blog, "Improving Wikipedia with friendly competition", was posted at the end of April. This may be of interest to those who are signed up to this newsletter, as well as serving as another way to draw attention to our project. Also, we would again like to thank United Kingdom Jarry1250 (submissions) and Bavaria Stone (submissions), for continued help behind the scenes. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

[edit]

Please

[edit]

I notice that you recently split/merged the early 20th century Pacific hurricanes into decadal lists. I've recently taken the liberty of fixing the redirects and creating new categories as part of housekeeping in the aftermath of your actions. Next time, might I suggest doing the housekeeping next time you do any sort of major split/merger? Thank you so much. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

[edit]

Post on 2012 Atlantic hurricane season talk

[edit]

I understand that your trying to tell us that we need to stop complaining and make the article ourselves, but I found that a little offensive. Some of us can't make the article due to other users redirecting a certain title, my basic goal was to ask if anyone who had more power than me to take away the redirection so an article can be made. I've only been on Wikipedia for a half a year now, and I don't know how to preform most of the possibilities to improve it. STO12 (talk) 23:43, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

[edit]

WikiCup 2012 May newsletter

[edit]

We're halfway through round 3 (or the quarter finals, if you prefer) and things are running smoothly. We're seeing very high scoring; as of the time of writing, the top 16 all have over 90 points. This has already proved to be more competative than this time last year- in 2011, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 was the lowest qualifying score. People have also upped their game slightly from last round, which is to be expected as we approach the end of the competition. Leading Pool A is Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), whose points have mostly come from a large number of did you knows on marine biology. Pool B's leader, Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions), is for the first time not our highest scorer at the time of newsletter publication, but his good articles on The X-Files and Millenium keep him in second place overall. Wisconsin Miyagawa (submissions) leads Pool C, our quietest pool, with content in a variety of areas on a variety of topics. Pool D is led by Scotland Casliber (submissions), our current overall leader. Nearly half of Casliber's points come from his triple-scored Western Jackdaw, which is now a featured article.

This round has seen an unusually high number of featured lists, with nearly one in five remaining participants claiming one, and one user, New York City Muboshgu (submissions), claiming two. Miyagawa's featured list, 1936 Summer Olympics medal table, was even awarded double points. By comparison, good article reviews seem to be playing a smaller part, and featured topics portals remain two content-types still unutilised in this competition. Other than that, there isn't much to say! Things are coming along smoothly. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

[edit]

DYK for Hurricane Bud (2012)

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

IRC Sever Died

[edit]

The IRC Server died, just to let you know. --TheAustinMan(Talk|Works) 22:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

[edit]

Wikipedia Help Survey

[edit]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Hey

[edit]

Hey, I saw your user page. I just wanted to make sure everything was alright. I'm on IRC if you wanna talk, shoot the breeze, whatnot. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

[edit]

WikiCup 2012 June newsletter

[edit]

Apologies for the lateness of this letter; our usual bot wasn't working. We are now entering round 4, our semi-finals, and have our final 16. A score of 243 was required to reach this round; significantly more than 2011's 76 points, and only a little behind 2010's 250 points. By comparison, last year, 150 points in round 4 secured a place in the final; in 2010, 430 were needed. Commiserations to Pool A's Minas Gerais igordebraga (submissions), who scored 242 points, missing out on a place in the round by a whisker. However, congratulations to Pool B's Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions), whose television articles have brought him another round victory. Pool A's Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came second overall, with an impressive list of biological did you knows, good articles and featured articles. Third overall was Pool D's New York City Muboshgu (submissions), with a long list of contibutions, mostly relating to baseball. Of course, with the points resetting every round, the playing field has been levelled. The most successful Pool was Pool D, which saw seven into the final round. Pool B saw four, C saw three and Pool A saw only the two round leaders.

A quick note about other competitions taking place on Wikipedia which may be of interest. There are 13 days remaining in the June-July GAN backlog elimination drive, but it is not too late to take part. August will also see the return of The Core Contest- a one month long competition first run in 2007. While the WikiCup awards points for audited content on any subject, The Core Contest about is raw article improvement, focussing heavily on the most important articles on Wikipedia. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 11:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

[edit]

FYI

[edit]

American Samoa is in Nadis AoR which is 160E to 120W. Any references to an American Samoa AOR are basically to the forecasts offices marine forecasts area of responsibility.Jason Rees (talk) 14:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category 6 hurricane

[edit]

There is an ongoing discussion at List of Category 6 Atlantic hurricanes as to whether this page should be kept or redirected to List of Category 5 Atlantic hurricanes. Your input on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. United States Man (talk) 04:39, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

[edit]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Hi

Nikkywikky321 (talk) 15:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re GAN Hurricane Doreen (1977)

[edit]

Hi,

I've made a few comments at Talk:Hurricane Doreen (1977)/GA1. Otherwise, everything looks fine.

Best wishes,

MathewTownsend (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

Just an FYI -- I put in a request for semi-protection for the Western Athletic Conference page. Getting no response from an IP user that continues to put up unsourced / soapbox / unverifiable / etc. content is getting old. Mdak06 (talk) 01:13, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

[edit]

Deletion discussions

[edit]

There are currently two ongoing deletion discussions here and here. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. United States Man (talk) 06:27, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LA Lakers

[edit]

Its not about being short! Its only like giving a small intro for the season to come.

TriNitroGlycerin (talk) 16:16, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

[edit]

WikiCup 2012 July newsletter

[edit]

We're approaching the beginning of 2012's final round. Pool A sees Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) as the leader, with 300 points being awarded for the featured article Bivalvia, and Pool B sees Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions) in the lead, with 10 good articles, and over 35 articles eligible for good topic points. Pool A sees New York City Muboshgu (submissions) in second place with a number of articles relating to baseball, while Pool B's Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions) follows Grapple X, with a variety of contributions including the high-scoring, high-importance featured article on the 2010 film Pride & Prejudice. Ruby2010, like Grapple X, also claimed a number of good topic points; despite this, not a single point has been claimed for featured topics in the contest so far. The same is true for featured portals.

Currently, the eighth-place competitor (and so the lowest scorer who would reach the final round right now) has scored 332, more than double the 150 needed to reach the final round last year. In 2010, however, 430 was the lowest qualifying score. In this competition, we have generally seen scores closer to those in 2010 than those in 2011. Let's see what kind of benchmark we can set for future competitions! As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yellow_Evan/Archive_14&oldid=1144154363"