User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive178

DYK for Battle of Ap Bau Bang II

On July 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Ap Bau Bang II, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Battle of Suoi Tre

On July 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Suoi Tre, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Battle of Ap Gu

On July 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Ap Gu, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Colin Egar

On July 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Colin Egar, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 18:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mick Harvey (umpire)

On July 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mick Harvey (umpire), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Ray Harvey

On July 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ray Harvey, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Operation Truong Cong Dinh

On July 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Operation Truong Cong Dinh, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Battle of Ap Gu

Hello! Your submission of Battle of Ap Gu at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NortyNort (Holla) 13:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Battle of Prek Klok I

On July 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Prek Klok I, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Battle of Prek Klok II

On July 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Prek Klok II, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Operation Lam Son II

On July 22, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Operation Lam Son II, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

E-mail

Sent & thanks in advance. Btw, what's the matter with your user page, some new annoying users? Take it easy :) Grenouille vert (talk) 03:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the senior cán bộ have very bad policies and my dissent isn't pleasing them YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 06:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your e-mail, it's really really helpful! About your annoyance, I can assure that the situation is improved day by day, so just be patient a little bit more, everything will be fine (I think, and hope) . Grenouille vert (talk) 10:11, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Were you referring to RL in Vietnam or En.wiki? Although many other wikis have the same problem YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam military questions

I'm working on the History of rail transport in Vietnam and have a question for you about the wartime period in Vietnam. Off the top of your head, can you think of any particular major operations that involved bombing (or otherwise destroying) rail infrastructure in the South or North? This could be either during WWII, First Indochina War, Vietnam War, Sino-Vietnamese War, whatever—you can have a look in the sandbox to see some references that I've stuck in there so far. --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 19:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the VC ambushed things that were travelling on highways and waterways so I'd be surprised if they didn't ambush railways. The same for the 19th century guys like Truong Dinh and Phan Dinh Phung, if railways were around in those days, or other 20th guys although not in the Yen Bai mutiny. In 1945-54 the CIA and Lucien Conein and Edward Lansdale did try to sabotage communist railways including by polluting the fuel and blowing the odd thing up. I can't remember what was in Operation Linebacker I and Operation Linebacker II, Operation Rolling Thunder (a-class) but it may have stuff. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I knew about Linebacker and Rolling Thunder; there were plenty of railroads getting bombed in each of those. Truong Dinh was too early for railways; Phan Dinh Phung was still alive when the first railways were being pioneered, but it seems as though he wasn't in the right place to attack them. I'll look up the CIA stuff once I'm ready to start rewriting the First Indochina/Vietnam War section. Thanks for the suggestions! --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 05:39, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yagan

Hello. In April you added a citation to a book from the "Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases" series published by Icon Group International to this article to reference text about his gravesite. Unfortunately, Icon Group International is not a reliable source - their books are computer-generated, with most of the text copied from Wikipedia (most entries have [WP] by them to indicate this, see e.g. [1]). I've only removed the reference, not the text it was referencing. The actual report reference is here:[ http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yUwAOwAACAAJ], but the text isn't online. This newsletter might be a useful reference:[2]. I'm removing a lot of similar references as they are circular references; many other editors have also been duped by these sources. Despite giving an appearance of reliability, the name "Webster's" has been public domain since the late 19th century. Another publisher to be wary of as they reuse Wikipedia articles is Alphascript Publishing. Fences&Windows 00:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Me

Take your pick from health problems, mad home life and busy work life. All reasonable explanations. --Dweller (talk) 10:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Racist message left by Ecko1o1

You have helped me with incidents of racism in the past, so I figured it would be easiest to report this to you.

Ecko1o1 left this racist message on my talk page [3]. Can some disciplinary action be taken against this user. He has tried to make some racist edits to Asian American in the past (this is the most recent one [4]). I went to Elockid for help, but because of their involvement they are powerless (see [5]). Can something be done to this user regarding their blatant racism. Thanks Thegreyanomaly (talk) 21:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[6] another racist post... Thegreyanomaly (talk) 21:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reported at WP:AIV. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harveys

Have you given up of cricket FACs? :) I'm sure there are more 1948 articles out there somewhere! I'm more or less back properly now after a few housing hiccups. I noticed there are a few of your Harvey articles at GA at the moment. I can review them if you've no problem with me doing it; I've nothing at review at the moment as I'm still slogging away at the never ending Hutton article. I'm also putting together bits and pieces on Yardley, if you are interested. --Sarastro1 (talk) 22:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't given up, the main problem is that since January they changed the rules so that you can only have one article in the queue, and as my articles consistently 3.5 weeks at least for 28 of the last 30 FACs, it's slow. I also tried to break up the order with some swimming articles that were just waiting there, as it is claimed that people like reviewing variation articles, but Neil Brooks took 2.5 weeks (which I suspect was because he was famous for being a drunk and a wild guy instead of because it was a new topic), but the next, Peter Evans (swimmer) took 4 weeks. The thing is nowadays if your WikiProject doesn't turn up or a lot of the FAC regulars like your work then you sit there unattended :(. Giants2008 reviews all the sport ones, but you need at least three supports and that means waiting a long time for a random person in the case of swimming and cricket articles. I pop into most sports articles but the other sports guys from other sports don't review and the FAC inner circle don't like sport (or Vietnamese history) (but quite a few other regulars consistently have 7-14 day FACs due to fast servicing of one another) (there are also claims of karma by the FAC coord, but Hamiltonstone does a lot and always waits 28 days although the article doesn't need major work, while others get the express queue even though they don't review much). So if you want the cricket FACs to start rolling, you'll have to have a look at Mark Kerry. Feel free to review the Harveys. I have a personal policy of not reviewing GACs from projects I'm in except to fail them, because I don't want the stigma to be attached to the article and the author that I cheated for them or something, but in the case of cricket and the others we've been raising content points that outsiders can't or won't, whereas some other wikiprojects (usually ethnic/national ones) have 100% one-line supports for all their FACs in spite of bad, home-made POV sources and the like. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:04, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen you review football GANs, so Talk:Australia may amuse you if he thinks that Cahill could displace Fabregas or Schwarzer over Casillas or something. At least Shakib al Hasan and Tamim Iqbal would make a squad in the other countries. He soapboxed a whole heap last year on the same point. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:09, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you could've edited without internet as you just need a text editor and then add content YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 07:05, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I could have done if my computer wasn't in a box for the last 3 weeks under a pile of crap! :) I'll review a couple of the Harveys for now. --Sarastro1 (talk) 09:50, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For obvious reasons. Duh YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed Harvey family, starting next one shortly.--Sarastro1 (talk) 09:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

OK, there's gotta be a better way of doing this.

There are countless articles that you've edited that have empty ref tags (Tags which are formatted REF NAME=text, yet have no text within the tag). When I remove the empty ref tags, you simply revert my edit, putting them back without fixing the problem. This causes numerous reference errors which results in big bold red text at the bottom of every page you do this on.

There has to be a better way to fix these reference errors without having you continuously revert these edits. Should I instead add something to these empty ref tags? Such as "MISSING REFERENCE"? This way an error will still show so that you may fix it, but it won't flag all over the place for having incorrect ref formatting.

Please respond instead of simply ignoring the problem you're creating... Thank you. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 02:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portal link position

It was not advertisement , instead I saw that from Cricket page and copied to rest. So, where does the portal link go? Vinay84 (talk) 02:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean advertising for selling something or promoting yourself, just displaying the portal at the top. It is normally in a see also at the bottom, if required, but generally it isn't done at all anymore YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Would a spin-off article on the North-South Tasmania AFL debate be appropriate? As in, the history of AFL games in Tas and how Hobart now want matches with NORTH Melbourne and Richmond? Aaroncrick ^TALK 03:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? Looks like North will be in forever now. a fair-weather batsman YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 07:05, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naadapriya

He appears to be back under the account Avanale (talk · contribs) and possibly Kanindian (talk · contribs). Even if the ban is enforced on the first of these accounts before you see this, an admin would definitely appreciate confirmation (and if it's not enforced by the time you see this, I'd appreciate it if you could enforce it). :) Cheers, Ncmvocalist (talk) 10:14, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One is the other isnt YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tran Thien Khiem & Do Cao Tri

Hello, your July 19th edits to Tran Thien Khiem & Do Cao Tri added a ref named "ww" but without the source, and there's no clue what it might be. please fix. - Salamurai (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Lankan Barnstar of National Merit

		The Sri Lankan Barnstar of National Merit
		To YellowMonkey, For not being afraid to jump into hot topics related to Sri Lanka, fighting against vandalism in Sri Lanka and other Asian articles, and not forgetting the fine job you’ve done in Sri Lanka Cricket articles. Well done! Chanaka L (talk) 03:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
		_{this WikiAward was given to YellowMonkey by Chanaka L (talk) on 03:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

Keep up the good work! Best--Chanaka L (talk) 03:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 06:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wally, Wally, Wally

Another dodgy England captain! I'm having another go at Wally Hammond at FAC, having copy-edited it and made it a bit more to the point. Any comments appreciated! --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:18, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coming YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 06:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think - I think - that your block of user:Splittist may have been in error. He was using multiple accounts, yes, but not simultaneously, and only because he would become bored with a username. Or that's what he tells me, anyway.

Unless you have a reason not to, I'll unblock him - or, at the very least, give him back talkpage access. DS (talk) 21:38, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pfft. He'll be spruking the fake Panchen Lama again, if he isn't already socking already. Still I bet you he did it to make it seem as though many people are editing. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 06:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - March through July 2010

Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar.

If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of CT Cooper at 19:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports

In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed

WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

Technology report: Major MediaWiki release, password security, vulnerable MediaWiki installations, and more

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks to all who participated in the drive! Over 100 editors—including Jimbo Wales—signed up this time (nearly triple the participants of the May drive). This benefited the Guild as well as the articles in need of copy editing. You can see from the comparison graphs that we increased the number of completed copyedits substantially. Unfortunately, we were not able to meet our goal of completely wiping out 2008 from the queue. We also were not able to reduce the backlog to less than 6,000 articles. We suspect people were busy with real life summertime things, at least in the northern hemisphere! We were able to remove the months of January, February, March, April, and May from the backlog, and we almost wiped out the month of June. We reduced the backlog by 1,289 articles (17%), so all in all it was a very successful drive, and we will be holding another event soon. We'll come up with some new ideas to try to keep things fresh and interesting. Keep up the good work, everybody!

Stats
If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you edited in the May 2010 GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive, your word totals are cumulative for barnstars (not the leaderboard). Over the course of the next week or two, we will be handing out the barnstars.

Eight people will receive The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Barnstar (100,000+ words): Chaosdruid, Diannaa, Ericleb01, Lfstevens, Shimeru, S Masters, The Utahraptor, and Torchiest.
Bullock and Slon02 will receive The Order of the Superior Scribe (80,000+).
The Barnstar of Diligence (60,000+) goes to Derild4921, GaryColemanFan, kojozone, and Mlpearc.
The Modern Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar (40,000+) goes to A. Parrot, AirplanePro, Auntieruth55, Bejinhan, David Rush, and mono.
Nobody will receive The Old School League of Copy Editors award (30,000+).
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (20,000+) goes to Backtable, Cindamuse, dtgriffith, Duff, e. ripley, Laurinavicius, NerdyScienceDude, and TEK.
The Cleanup Barnstar (12,000+) goes to Brickie, Casliber, cymru lass, December21st2012Freak, Nolelover, TheTito, Whoosit, and YellowMonkey.
The Working Man's Barnstar (8,000+) goes to Bsherr, Duchess of Bathwick, HELLKNOWZ, Mabeenot, noraft, Pyfan, and Richard asr.
The Modest Barnstar (4,000+) goes to Adrian J. Hunter, Airplaneman, Annalise, Camerafiend, Cricket02, Fetchcomms, Gosox5555, LeonidasSpartan, Paulmnguyen, Piotrus, SuperHamster, Taelus, and TPW.

Gold Star Award

**Gold Star Award Leaderboard**
	Articles	Words	5k+ Articles
1.	Diannaa (248)	Shimeru (200,392)	Shimeru/Ericleb01 (13)
2.	Slon02 (157)	Diannaa (164,960)	Chaosdruid (8)
3.	GaryColemanFan (101)	Chaosdruid (130,630)	Derild4921 (7)
4.	Torchiest (100)	The Utahraptor (117,347)	GaryColemanFan/Slon02 (6)
5.	Shimeru (80)	Ericleb01 (114,893)	Bejinhan/The Utahraptor (5)

Coordinator: ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! Co-coordinators: Diannaa ^TALK and S Masters (talk) | Newsletter by: The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions}

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 18:19, 1 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Your rv on the Sachin Tendulkar page

When you revert someone's edit, please make sure you are not inadvertently undoing somebody else's work too. Cribananda (talk) 03:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot to delete the outdated info you corrected YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Olympic Cyclist

Template:Infobox Olympic Cyclist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Severo^TC 09:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]