Jump to content

User talk:Yeeno/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Your submission at Articles for creation: ZOTAC International (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You still need to add all additional amounts of in-depth third-party news sources overall, please no press releases or trivial passing mentions.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 03:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2016, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Bee-Stinger

The page looks much better with the help everyone did, do you think you can remove the tag now please Street sting (talk) 00:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Archive

I'm trying to make an archive page.FourLights (talk) 04:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

References

Dear Meiloorun: I have added references, as you suggested. Thank you for your note. Ferdzik (talk) 04:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

ल् l is found in Garhwali language

Hi Meiloorun, I belong to Garhwal & I'm a native, primary speaker of the Garhwali. Why you deleted the ल्, please tell me the reasons. & if you need such citation I'm just editing the whole section of Consonant in Garhwali language. So I request you not to delete such edition until I complete the all with citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asish.m.kukareti (talk • contribs) 05:25, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Kaithamalai in Uttukuli NOT in Chennai

Hi Meiloorun,

Am not sure for tagging my Kaithamalai post for deletion. Can you please provide me the points whichever seems to be incorrect\inappropriate ?

Thanks, Aravind.S Aravind.ukl (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


Aravind.ukl, The subject presented in your article does not have clear evidence of Notability. You can establish evidence by citing sources from independently verifiable sources. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask on my talk page. Meiloorun talk 🍁 17:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Posit Science Corporation

I've objected (or whatever the word is) to the Speedy Deletion tag. (See the article's Talk Page.) I'm interested in knowing more about the variety of reasons for which you think it should be speedily deleted. Lou Sander (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
I award this for your recent contribution on the Pokémon Theme article; for adding an audio sample of the theme song. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 00:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 Thank you very much! Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 03:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Meiloorun. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Incandescence

Did it improoved? I really dfont know if a chemical reaction inhibit incandescence but it seems to me that both things are not related, articler said: "when no" impliying that both phenomena were exclusive so i changed it for "wether or not" to imply that both can be simultaneus, but in depth im not sure- P.S.: I already have an account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.56.225.59 (talk) 22:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that is right but you'll have to check google and possibly find a source. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 22:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

TIA is TAB

Hi,

I suspect you may be mistaken in rolling back my edit on TIA. Speaking from South Africa, it is more common in Africa to say "TAB" rather than "TIA". An example from the net: http://aarontempler.com/post/thats-africa-baby/

41.160.157.211 (talk) 12:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Blokeo

Can you please show me the specific edit? I can't seem to find it. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 17:13, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quentin Stafford-Fraser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

please read WP:PROD before prodding articles again

Hi, if an user removes a prod without giving a reason, this is bad style, but it's allowed. If that happens, you can take the article to WP:AFD, you can't restore the prod [1] or warn the user against removing deletion notices [2]. Cheers. Uanfala (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me of my mistake. Will do in the future. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 22:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

i got your message about refrences

ill add those in right now im working on citing my sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by JayusYT (talk • contribs) 00:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

I fixed what you have asked for

i have added in refrences and i also explained why the subjected of the page needs to be included in the free encuclopedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by JayusYT (talk • contribs) 01:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

WP:BLPPROD

This procedure is only for articles about living people. Someone who was born in 1874, such as Chalmers J. Lyons, can safely be assumed to be no longer living. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 13:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Untitled

Hi there, Not sure but did you get my response re: EFN-USA? i.e., that i added words indicating the purpose of the organization (education of people in the USA concerning benefits of nuclear science and technology). Hancman (talk) 01:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

@Hancman: Yes, but that is not why I CSD tagged your page. I tagged it for its lack of notability because I couldn't find any third party sources that could verify the notability of the organization. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 03:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm not sure if this where I'm supposed to post on your talk page, But I was wondering exactly how my Wikipedia page was thought as vandalism? I understand that most likely you couldn't find any third party resources as it is an idea fairly new and it's not well known, hence the reason I put it on Wikipedia. I would also like to thank you for your willingness to help spread information and get rid of false information I greatly appreciate it. -From Colbareia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colbareia (talk • contribs) 05:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foxtel On, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

2 Guns Deletion

Hello, I am still working on the 2 Guns Arizona page, I have no intention of leaving the info as is, or simply copy and pasting, I began this way, and I am editing it as I go along. There is a lot more to add to this most interesting place, I hope I will be allowed to continue editing.

Thank you

02:32, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Yorkshire — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yorkshiremethology (talk • contribs)

The Amazing Athiest Deletion

Hi, could you remove the deletion tag on The Amazing Athiest artical as I am currently editing the article. please have a look I have made some improvements. Lord Akira otafuku  Lord Akira otafuku Talk   13:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Hay in the future I want to add an Article About the Amazing Athiest, could you give me advice on how to write it so it is a viable Wikipedia Article Lord Akira otafuku  Lord Akira otafuku Talk   13:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

@Lord Akira otafuku: First I highly recommend you take a look at Wikipedia:Your first article. Since you are planning on making an article about a youtube personality, you should first gather references from reliable sources about the subject. To get started I suggest you try using the "News" section on Google to find related articles. You also should also write the article in a neutral tone. For example, it is bad to say "John Smith is a famous and well-known youtube personality." Instead, you should write, "John Smith is a Youtube personality, comedian, best known for his cat videos on YouTube." These are just a couple of examples of how to write an article. If you need further help, you can visit Help:Getting started to find many useful links and tutorials. Cheers, Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 00:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Peninsula Hot Springs Deletion

Hi Meiloorun. I am new to Wikipedia and I am still editing the page Peninsula Hot Springs. If you could please remove the speedy deletion tag it would be greatly appreciated. The page is not for promotional or advertising purposes. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peninsula Hot Springs (talk • contribs) 00:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


Tags on Ronald "Bee-Stinger" Savage

I just knew you would had put a tag on my page, just because none was there on the article -SMH.... If you have the time to place the tag you should fix what you see instead of doing what you did, so i'm respectfully asking to point out in your opinion what punctuation's you see need to be fixed in my article, you could had left it on my talk page Meiloorun instead of the unnecessary tag on the article in my opinion to disrespect this great hero to many people that I took the time to research (I respectfully hope this is not a edit war or attack on this man) I'm respectully asking if you can remove your tag and place it on my talk page. Street sting (talk) 05:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I don't put down maintainence tags because I dislike you or just for the sake of it. I tagged the page in order to inform other editors of the various grammar and tone mistakes in this article. For example, but not limited to, you wouldn't find the sentence, "You can use this DVD as a tip for preparing for college proccess." in an encyclopedia. Commas need to be place in front of dates at the beginning of sentences such as "In 2015,". Some phrases are not neutral and are subjective such as "the biggest shock wave throughout Hip Hop history". This phrase is subjective because others may disagree with this. I hope you understand my explainations for the tags and I hope you can use some of these tips to improve your article. For more info, please check out Wikipedia:Writing better articles. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 05:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
"the biggest shock wave throughout Hip Hop history" was taken from news clip's so i wrote what the NEWS WROTE as the NEW YORK DAILY NEWS, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, AND HIP HOP WEBSITES, if you make a comment you need to do your own research before making a statement as this one, I would not had put it if i did not read it -SMH... anyway you can go go www.allhiphop.com and hear those words YOURSELF..

"You can use this DVD as a tip for preparing for college proccess." was taken from the NEW YORK LIBRARY statement on the DVD - as i said you need to read the ref before placing tags, so far what you have said ARE BACKED UP by my ref;s . I respectfully ask if you can remove your tags and place them on my talk page. Street sting (talk) 05:42, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I am beginning to make changes to your article for style. If statements are directly taken from a news source, they must be quoted. The fact you have good refs, does not mean your article fits Wikipedia's style. I will continue to work on the article and will not remove the tags until it fits Wikipedia's guidelines. Thank you for understanding, Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 05:46, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Then I take it your changes will make it fit Wikipedia's guidelines, if that is the case Thank you very much.Street sting (talk) 05:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Meiloorun the article has been fixed, can you remove the tag now plaese? Street sting (talk) 03:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Ceci Bastida

Hello Meiloorun, can you helo me delete Ceclia Bastida page, her name is actual Ceci Bastida. I made that page. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yanet32 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Ed Burley Post

Hi There, You marked my submission for Ed Burley for speedy deletion because of A7 (not noteworthy enough). I can provide more content but wanted to ask what the threshold or criteria are for worthiness, i.e. if I had listed that Ed was an award winning filmmaker would that have been sufficient instead of just linking to his IMDB page, etc.? Thanks for your advice! Ziba — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zcranmer (talk • contribs) 01:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

I highly suggest you check out Wikipedia:Notability (people) for some good tips on how a person can be notable enough for Wikipedia. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 03:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Peter Tabe Deletion

Can you please not delete my page because it is for my year 12 research project — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pppppptabe (talk • contribs) 03:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Meiloorun. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Information icon Hello Meiloorun. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Nigel A Robinson. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

I apologize for my misunderstanding. I was unaware of this consensus earlier. Now I understand and this won't happen again. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 01:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hello Meiloorun. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:55, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter

Hello Yeeno,
Breaking the back of the backlog
We now have 805 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.
Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

meiloorun, i was worried about the copyright on p21 gallery. sorry. L.S. inc. (talk) 01:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

Speedy on Balvant singh (dank memer)

I've deleted this article, but in future with negative unsourced material on what might be a living person, it's best to tag them with G10 (attack page), so that they get swift admin attention. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 19:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello Yeeno,
Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .

Centre to Centre-right listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Centre to Centre-right. Since you had some involvement with the Centre to Centre-right redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:31, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

NPR

Hi. I'm just letting you know I have declined a speedy deletion tag you placed on Lisa Chien and replaced it with one of the correct criteria. For more information please read the instructions for patroling and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Blood flow analysis using wavelet transform

I just used a generic url for the copyvio nomination. I added the page urls to the talk page but should I have linked to one of those pages in the nomination so that the copyvio detector would give a positive result? Meters (talk) 05:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

@Meters: Someone else linked to the actual pages of the book on the talk page that had a copyvio, so I think it was okay in the end. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 00:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
That was me, I believe. There does not seem to be any way to link a long book url such that the copyvio detectors will give a positive result. Meters (talk) 00:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

I want to get an advanced help

Peoples like Salman Khan , Salman Iqbal etc. when we write there name on google , a sidebar in screen show up their information from wikipedia. How can i get those for my name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salman.iqbal.masood (talk • contribs) 06:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

@Salman.iqbal.masood: This is not a Wikipedia issue, so it shouldn't be posted here. However, I believe that Google only does this for notable people, sometimes they have a page on Wikipedia, some times they do not. To answer your question, you simply cannot, because you are not a notable person. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 19:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yeeno/Archive_1&oldid=1089559593"