User talk:Year1

DRN case status update

Due to your non-participation in the DRN case you opened, I am closing the case as failed and will be opening an RFC in a few on the article's talk page. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 23:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC) _{DRN Volunteer}[reply]

April 2020

Hello, Year1, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Esmereldagreen (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 20:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Annie Chapman while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 13:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rubenhold

You're putting it in the wrong section. It should go in a "Further reading" section if not used inline. My edits are no way censorship and your edit summaries are unnecessarily confrontational, rude and abusive. I'm merely trying to apply wikipedia's Manual of Style. DrKay (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How are these edits [1][2] "censorship of information due to personal bias"? DrKay (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Whitechapel_Murders".The discussion is about the topic Whitechapel murders.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Clone commando sev (talk) 00:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to participants:: DRN Case is closed as "failed", refer to the article talk page for RFC. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 23:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC) _{DRN Volunteer}[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pending Closure/RFC

If there is no response, this thread will be closed 24 hours after this time: May 13, 2020 at 19:06 (UTC) and an RFC will be opened to discuss this article. To continue participating, please visit this section to respond As you opened the Dispute, you are required to participate and provide comments when asked to do so. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 19:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC) _{DRN Volunteer}[reply]

RFC opened

An RFC has been opened at Talk:Whitechapel_murders#RFC_Description_of_5_victims_as_prostitutes as the DR has been closed as 'failed'. Please continue discussions there. Thanks! Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 23:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC) _{DRN Volunteer}[reply]