User talk:Yeahsoo~enwiki

Protecting Ieodo island

Just to let you know, adding {{sprotected}} or {{protected}} to a page is only a means for an admin to notify users that a page is protected. This does not actually confer protection to the article such as the notice you placed on Ieodo island. If you need help protecting a page, please contact an admin or request it. Thanks! -Loren 00:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss desired naming changes on Talk:Socotra Rock instead of unilaterally forking articles. Please note Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy which precludes us from including content or naming articles in such a way that they endorse the claim of one point of view. Additionally, please stop including protection templates on pages. Simply including the templates does not protect the page, which must be done by an admin. Falsely including such templates is frowned upon and persistant attempts are considered to be vandalism. -Loren 00:12, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very good, please change Socotra Rock into a redirect, as in the first version, and remove the suyan rock redirection, I do not understand, why suyan rock must be a recirect of soroctra rock, how many people use socotra, while how many people use suyan. suyan is a official name in US goverment file.

Unspecified source for Image:Malado.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Malado.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Visviva 13:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erm..

Hello! Just wanted to notify you that even if you insert a moveprotected tag on an article, it isn't really protected against article-moving unless an admin actually designate the article as a move-protected article. The tag is only there to inform people when an admin move-protects an article, so the tag itself doesn't do anything. Happy editing & Keep up your good contribution to Wikipedia. ! Deiaemeth 03:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about image:Suyan rock.png in Japanese Wikipedia article ja:蘇岩礁

You added image:Suyan rock.png in Japanese Wikipedia article ja:蘇岩礁.but That image is not clear about Copyright.please write back map's copy right in Image:Suyan rock.png.I will write same sentence in Japanese your note.if it was not clear, I will delete your image from ja:蘇岩礁.--Forestfarmer 03:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Japanese tone in articles

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! --DeLarge 22:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi Yeahsoo,

You have been marking a large number of edits as minor. This includes many edits in which you substantially changed the tone and content of articles; for example, Kimchi. Please read Help:Minor edit, and do not mark edits as minor unless they are not controversial: "any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if the edit is a single word." Cheers, -- Visviva 02:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Latest reverts

Best not try gaming the system. Your edits are too systematically disparaging for you to plead ingenuously that you're just trying to improve WP. For the record, the definition of {{db-attack}} is "a page created primarily to disparage its subject". Your history allows us to ascertain that without assuming bad faith.

As for Toyota, it was reverted for not being notable. Ford recalled 1.2m trucks and SUVs here, GM recalled 900,000 trucks here, and Chrysler, rather shamefully, had to recall 1.1m Jeeps, then another 800,000 Jeeps, then 1.2m minivans. When you sell 8m+ cars a year, recalling a million at a time is not uncommon. Your failure to compare or note these other recalls on their manufacturers' articles, or to put the Toyota recalls in context, is what gives away your anti-Japanese agenda. --DeLarge 23:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting!A "1m" toyota recall is not an issue, but others recall 0.9m is an issue? Even you sell 8m, so what? Even Toyota did not deny it, why you can not accept? It is just tell a fact, no POV at all. Or, do you work for toyota?--Yeahsoo 23:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, none of them are an issue, I merely pointed out that Toyota don't recall any more vehicles than any other car maker. You're the one inserting recall info into Toyota without context, while ignoring the American companies' recall history completely, even though it's no better, and in Chrysler's case much worse. It's certainly not notable enough to warrant an entire section, unless you're trying to blow the issue out of proportion, which is exactly the anti-Japanese agenda you're denying. --DeLarge 00:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Canon (company). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. At any rate please do not do more than three reverts in a 24h period. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --DeLarge 23:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ryukyu1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ryukyu1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this is cut from the screen shot of a marine mapping system and add comments: Unfortunately, this is not enough to validate a free license. The marine mapping system images may be copyright protected, and derivatives thereof are hence also protected. Please name the mapping system to support your claim of a free image -- Chris 73 | Talk 23:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the {{windows-software-screenshot}} is for fair use claims. However, a fair-use screenshot can only be used to comment on the software; it can't be used for maps and images cited in unrelated articles. -- Visviva 04:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Yeahsoo,

2 things: 1. I'm not Korean. 2. I will try to be more civil in the future. But frankly, when an editor is brazenly attempting to violate a very important policy just to push his or her own point of view, as you have been doing with Image:Suyan rock eng.jpg, that editor should not be surprised when other editors describe his or her behavior as "brazen."

Happy editing! -- Visviva 02:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Goguryeo

Please do tell me why the Chinese name is before the Korean name since it was not even a Chinese Kingdom or Dynasty? Btw if your going to respond please do so on my page. Jegal 16:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What a joke

Wow, Almost all of my sources are not Korean and they all Say Goguryeo was a Korean Kingdom and most certainly not Chinese. It is you who is using only Chinese sources. Ask older Chinese and they belive Goguryeo is Korean. only in the past couple of decades has the COMMUNIST PRC claim Goguryeo is Chinese. Using all sorts of "Reliable and proven sources" which of course none are non-Chinese. Talking about how South Korean uses propaganda is joke while you ignore China's massive communist propaganda and its own historical revisionism. Don't even reply back. China says bark and people like you bark. Jegal 22:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, who is the one that is barking now ? Huh?

Why so upset? Look at your red blooded face. It is all about scholarship and research. If you can find any ancient document said Goguryeo is Korean country, then we do not need to argue here. I can show you bunch of ancient book and how Tang emperor approved Goguryeo king of his title.Even Goguryeo history document is written in Chinese. But if you keep talking in that rude way, It is just my last word to you.--Yeahsoo 05:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rude Way? Like your claims insults about SK goverment releasing propaganda, "how koreans are brain-Washed" The "huh" in the title is also provactive and sarcastic and insulting remark about Korean History? ah yes nice adding the Red Blooded Face argument AFTER the orginal Comment. ONE Goguryeo King or all of them? which would be impossiable because Goguryeo was often at war with Sui And Tang. There is a reason it is called one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea. they were considered to be barbaric because Goguryeo traced its family lineage though the women and I belive was called one of the "Three Savage States" If Goguryeo was so backward then it couldn't be Chinese huh? You tell me about I need to do research but you havent done so in this aspect, Hangul wasn't developed until the 1400's until then everything was written in Chinese in Korea. Ancient Doucments? most if not all Written records were I belive in Wood. Wood is not going to survive over 1,400+ years. As it is There was no such thing as Korea the Three Korean Kingdoms were all seperate by varying degress of Genetics,Language and culture etc. There will be no document saying it was Literally saying it was Korean. As it is we see differently and neither one is going to change. Theres not point argueing So I say we drop it. Good Day and take care Jegal 22:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - This is the first time I heard "Three Savage States", you do not need to insult the ancient people just try to depart them from China. I just provide the record from ancient Chinese book,if you can not provide, then it is none of my business. I did not say Goguryeo is backward. I heard Korea has 6000 years history. and Chinese Charactors and paper were invented by Korean. How come you do not have any documents, and have to write on wood? Man you are way too emotional, I just don't like being called "bark", but you just keep yelling at me--Yeahsoo 23:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three Savage states I got from a Chinese source which was recently used by another Wikipedian. I did not say you said it was backward I was referring to Chinese sources which said Koreans were Backward. One is not way too emotional when in fact they were offended by your inital response. Again you insinuate all Koreans are ultra-nationalists. we all know Chinese-Characters and Paper were not created by a Korean. Korea Argueably has 6,000 Years of history depending on when you judge one's history. China as a country has more or less exsisted for around 2,200 years ago but then Chinese civilization more or less we first started to see around 5,000 years ago and older like 6,000+. There are documets most did not survive others were destroyed mainly by the Mongols and of course the Japanese. the 3K used alot of Woodblock though Paper was also used. I didn't call you personally "Bark" its a figure of speech. Jegal 23:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again you insinuate all Koreans are ultra-nationalists. " I did not. And I know not all Koreans are ultra-nationalists. but it is not my fault people get this impression. Your goverment just change history book add another 1000 years history, with no common agreement in historians. and you know how many Chinese stuff are claimed invented by Korean. please do not try to explain asif they are real, I am tired of it. See those Korean history TV serials, all Chinese are bad guys and invaders, even worse than Japanese? While, Chinese still think Korean is good friend as since ancient time. For god's sake, Ming and Qing dynasty send army to help Korea defend against Japan and did not keep army after war. Even Gogurye is silla asked Tang to conquer. If waht your gov did is not brain washing, what is it? What is Korean trying to do? Build a grant Korean, like just in your history book, half China used to be Korean territory? Tell you what, a liar will never become true, even it is repeated a thousand times --Yeahsoo 00:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

yes, yes, China re-writes its history books and a number of Chinese ignore it and all they talk about is ROK and Japan re-writing history. one Famous example is the re-writing of the Tiananmen Square killings, and that is just one inciendent and more or less the most well-known example. Im not going to dig up other Examples. It didn't add 1,000 more years it claimed its bronze age was developed earlier. regardless you nor most people have the right to criticize other countries historical crap in the frist place. China does it Japan Does it North Korea does it South Korea does it America does it Russia does it Europe does it heck, even Africans do it. Its not just Koreans. The Japanese wanted to conquer China it was in their best interest to help Joseon during Imjin. when the Manchus took over China, Korea became a tributary state to Qing. Qing wanted Korea to stay under Manchu influence not westerner or Japanese. Actually Silla requested Aid and both Tang and Silla formed an alliance and destroyed goguryeo from which its survivors fled/captured by China,Silla and others fled and the rest formed Balhae. There are no such Books claimed that half of historical China belonged to Korea those are done by ultra-nationalists whose books are banned from public education. On the issue of Goguryeo the liar is China. Korea lies a lot too but on this issue its China who is lying. If this was such ancient knowledge then how come PRC only started claiming Goguryeo was Chinese in the past 2 decades?

As it is I think this is enough arguing. Don't reply as neither will I.

Good Day and take care Friend

Jegal 20:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. But it is important that you actually open a discussion about a template before deleting contents or inserting POV tags onto it, as tags are not meant to be inserted into templates (as they will disrupt whichever page they are used in).

Thanks! Deiaemeth 04:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Goguryeo, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. --Nlu (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I accuse you of sock puppetry

Hey! I accused of sock puppetry at Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Ksyrie. You may not be a sock puppet, and I'm aware of the possibility that you'd be really mad, as Ksyrie was. Let me apologize ahead of time, that this is just a if-scenario thing. Defend yourself at the discussion page. (Wikimachine 17:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Goguryeo.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]}

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to open new mediation cases. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 08:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC).

Baitou Shan

Yeahsoo, I think the Chinese name for the mountain is called "Baitou Shan" - as the Korean Hanja name indicates. Changbai Shan is the name of the mountain range, but we Chinese tend to use it synonymously/in place of Baitou Shan. As long as Changbai Shan is Chinese, I have no significant objections to the status quo. Personally I think we have a better case for Tianchi Lake [1], where the Chinese romanization is by far more popular and also relates to the Tianchi Lake Monster article[2].

Just curious, 你是东北人吗?

Regards,

Assault11 21:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three kingdoms or Korea

YOu sure can create a new map. Please upload it under a new name, however. To help you, i just uploaded the OpenOffice.org source file at commons:Image:Three Kingdoms of Korea Map.sxd. Best wishes, -- Chris 73 | Talk 07:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proceeding with the Goguryeo mediation

Hello! : )

This is Daniel Bryant and Armed Blowfish from the Mediation Committee, and as you may be aware, we are mediating the Goguryeo Mediation Committee case.

We are sending you this message as you are one of the involved parties in this dispute. Recently, a private wiki was set up for private mediation by the Mediation Committee. As noted by the Mediation Committee policy on confidentiality, mediation is confidential, and therefore the Committee has decided in this case to hold all mediation discussions in this case on the private wiki. Therefore, we need you to get an account so the case can proceed.

To request an account on the private Mediation Wiki, please click this link to email Armed Blowfish. Please include "Goguryeo" somewhere in the subject, e.g. "Private wiki account request for Goguryeo mediation", to note that this email has highest priority. If you do not have email enabled on your account and are unable to use the mail feature, please let us know on Armed Blowfish's talk page.

Thank you so much,
Daniel Bryant and Armed Blowfish (mail), 04:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I assume you commented on my talk page because you do not have email enabled on your account. There are several other ways I could give you your account information for the private mediation wiki.

You could talk to Daniel or me through some other private means like IRC. This is preferred.
If you have email but just don't want people to contact you using the mail link, I could give you my email address. Note that I would want my email address removed from your talk page as soon as you read it.
If neither of the above options work, I could give your account information publicly. You would need to confirm over here that you changed your password, so no one else has access to your account.

Thanks,

Armed Blowfish (mail) 17:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baekdu Mountains

Where did you get the idea that only the Koreans call Mount Baekdu as... well, Mount Baekdu (or Paektu)? Could you please care to highlight any non-Chinese organisations that uses "Changbai Mountains" to describe Mount Baekdu on their maps? Moreover, why is it that you ignore the fact that the Japanese people call the mountain "白頭山"(Mount Baekdu/Paektu)?--DandanxD 12:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

Hello! We believe enough participants have signed up for us to begin mediation. However, if you have not yet signed up for the MediationWiki, please do so.

Those of you who have signed up can log in at the following URL using the username and password sent in your account creation email: http://www.southportbeekeepers.co.uk/medcom/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&returnto=Goguryeo:Noticeboard

Be sure to watchlist this page, if you have not done so already, and check it regularly: http://www.southportbeekeepers.co.uk/medcom/index.php/Goguryeo:Noticeboard

There are questions for you to answer here, and you should watchlist this as well: http://www.southportbeekeepers.co.uk/medcom/index.php/Goguryeo:Opening

Thanks!

Armed Blowfish and Daniel Bryant, 07:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NATION ALLIANCE PARTY

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on NATION ALLIANCE PARTY, by Userpie, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because NATION ALLIANCE PARTY fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Non-natable political party founded yesterday.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting NATION ALLIANCE PARTY, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate NATION ALLIANCE PARTY itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Capital Cities and Tombs of the Ancient Koguryo Kingdom.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Capital Cities and Tombs of the Ancient Koguryo Kingdom.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shizhao 03:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Qsclogo blue hi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Qsclogo blue hi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ryukyu.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ryukyu.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion for Gageo Reef

Gageo Reef

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gageo Reef, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Gageo Reef. Jdcaust 14:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nomination for Gageo Reef

AfD nomination of Gageo Reef

Gageo Reef, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Gageo Reef satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gageo Reef and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Gageo Reef during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Jdcaust (talk) 17:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suyan rock eng.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Suyan rock eng.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

I have posted a question at Wikipedia:Deletion review#File:Socotra Rock.png which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle (talk) 09:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

saguaro photo

Hi I'm using your fantastic saguaro photo in my new song at youtube called APOCALYPTIC RIDE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtJcnf49D6w&feature=channel_page Is that okay with you? do you want me to include your name etc? thanks once again Bernie (talk) 19:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Yeahsoo~enwiki. You have new messages at Discospinster's talk page.
Message added 22:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Yeahsoo~enwiki. You have new messages at Discospinster's talk page.
Message added 23:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Question about deleting other's comments

An editor deletes other user's comment, which does not have any bad words but just disagree. I know users can put back to older version, but will this editor still be qualified as en Editor? This is about User_talk:Discospinster, the editor deleted my comments twice and gave no reason.thanks. --Yeahsoo (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As noted in my /FAQs, I do not get involved in third-party disputes. Please discuss your issues with the editor concerned, or seek a third opinion or other dispute resolution. Stifle (talk) 07:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Yeahsoo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Yeahsoo~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

03:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

20:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Administrative divisions of ancient China has been nominated for renaming

Category:Administrative divisions of ancient China has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]