User talk:Yasmina20

Welcome!

Hello, Yasmina20, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as List of The Apprentice candidates (UK series thirteen), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mr. MacTidy (talk) 14:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of The Apprentice candidates (UK series thirteen)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of The Apprentice candidates (UK series thirteen). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Apprentice (UK series thirteen). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Apprentice (UK series thirteen). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 14:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yasmina20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked as a ‘suspected’ sock puppet of an account called ‘ZestyLemonz’ however no proof has been shown? And I haven’t been informed as to why I’ve been suspected of sock puppetry, therefore I should be unblocked immediately

Decline reason:

Obvious sock, even without the supporting technical evidence.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I don't see this username mentioned in an SPI case. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:49, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's no point in opening an SPI case when the account quacks as loud as this one. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yasmina20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For the same reason I already stated, I want an OFFICIAL administrator to unblock my account, User:Ponyo is clearly unprofessional because no technical evidence has been shown. The comment for my unblock request was ‘obvious sock without the technical evidence’. Surely when a user is blocked, their IP address is blocked Also, so ‘ZestyLemonz’ would not be able to create multiple accounts. I want unblocking.

Decline reason:

Ponyo's an "OFFICICAL administrator". So am I, and this is a duck quacking into a megaphone if I ever saw one. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked talk page access due to the personal attacks from this block-evading confirmed sockpuppet. --Yamla (talk) 12:05, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]