User talk:Yannickslade

This is Yannickslade's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony Lawson has been accepted

Tony Lawson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Araling Panlipunan

Pa sagot naman po yung tanong nato?? ( ika-una at ika- dalawang yugto ng pananakop ng europeo sa mga kanluran at silangang asya??) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamNeil Roa (talk • contribs) 04:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cambridge Social Ontology Group (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caorongjin was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cambridge Social Ontology Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caorongjin (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yannickslade, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Caorongjin (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cambridge Social Ontology Group has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cambridge Social Ontology Group. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 19:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cambridge Social Ontology Group (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In my opinion, this one is notable enough. However, this submission reads more like an advertisement than a neutraly worded encyclopedia article. Words like "aims", "is dedicated" and "grew in prominence" are not acceptable in an encyclopedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cambridge Social Ontology Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cambridge Social Ontology Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cambridge Social Ontology Group

The article Cambridge Social Ontology Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent references. Group seems to be moribund, website doesn't appear to have been updated since 2014/2015 (list books from that period as "Just published"... Like most researchs groups, this does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cambridge Social Ontology Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cambridge Social Ontology Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge Social Ontology Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 12:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]