User talk:Yamharsha5

Welcome!

Hello, Yamharsha5, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Roshan Meka, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Finngall ^talk 05:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yamharsha5 I am also a artical user English and Hindi I think that your eadited article Bahubali: The Conclusion in Dharm Production missing pls watch its poster their dharma available pls add. Jorjman (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roshan Meka

The article Roshan Meka has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --Finngall ^talk 05:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Koratala Siva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gopichand. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roshan Meka

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Roshan Meka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roshan Meka

The article Roshan Meka has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq (talk) 07:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roshan Meka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bangarraju

Thank you for your contribution, but your text is very short. The notability of a future film is unknown.Xx236 (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello. You recently removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Roshan Meka, and I wanted to let you know that it has been replaced. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 13:56, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Upasana Kamineni

The article Upasana Kamineni has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Toyedzapp (talk) 06:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Upasana Kamineni

Hello Yamharsha5,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Upasana Kamineni for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Cotton2 (talk) 06:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ala Ela

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ala Ela requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 07:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Upasana Kamineni

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Upasana Kamineni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf (talk) 05:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 05:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chandoo Mondeti

The article Chandoo Mondeti has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 07:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Nani (actor) ‎ . Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yamharsha5. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mosagaallaku Mosagaadu (2015)

Thank you for your contribution, but it's not a correct Wikipedia page. IMDB isn't a reliable source, the page is very short.Xx236 (talk) 09:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-release business

Hi there, re: these additions, please seek consensus somewhere central like WT:ICTF to discuss the inclusion of all this pre-release business stuff. Nothing of that sort is encouraged at our Manual of Style for film (the bible of film articles) and previous discussions about satellite rights sales tended to prefer exclusion on the basis that we're not here to log every dollar the film made or every business deal the film engaged in. It's rare to see any of this in western film articles. This seems largely an obsession in Indian cinema, and nobody has adequately argued for why we should care about it. Oh, and Andhra Box Office is a blog, and we don't use blogs as references. Please note WP:UGC. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability guidelines for film articles

Hi there, I notice that Bharath Ane Nenu, an article you recently created about an upcoming film, didn't indicate that principal photography has begun. Per WP:NFF:

Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun. (Emphasis theirs)

I've converted the article into a redirect. If you can can provide sourced information in the article that establish filming has begun, the article may be restored. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Farah Karimaee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Farah Karimaee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FITINDIA (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

INRConvert

Hi, re: this, it would be appreciated if you'd please not add {{INRConvert}} templates to film article infoboxes. The community decided months ago that these were problematic for a few reasons, including issues with inflation, needlessly converting to US dollars, and infobox clutter. Please see this discussion if you're interested in the background on this. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:53, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wall of names

Hi there, I've reverted this edit of yours. I don't think it's very helpful to readers to see a giant wall of names in the infobox. It distracts from the rest of the article. The infobox is intended to be a brief summary of the most important parts of the article, and having a massive list of names unduly draws attention to information that is not terribly important to our understanding of the subject. If you feel that it is important to mention every one of this guy's family members, you might consider creating a unique section for it instead, but I don't think it's particularly relevant. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:K. Palaniswami.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:K. Palaniswami.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPPRIVACY

Hi theeere, this edit from late January does not appear constructive to me. It's unclear what exercise in judgment led you to remove unsourced content in favor of unsourced content, but there is an obvious disparity with how reliable sources have presented the subject's birthdate, so arbitrarily picking one value and silently changing it is not at all constructive. The change has been reverted. See also Mariah Carey for an example of how a similar disparity was presented. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Diff: [1] It's unclear why you removed Tamil from the Baahubali entry when it's well-established that Baahubali was filmed in both Telugu and Tamil. Your change is indistinguishable from vandalism, and has the general shape of ethnic warring. Please don't make this change again without first achieving consensus. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samantha Gongol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samantha Gongol for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samantha Gongol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Gongol until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 02:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Baahubali = bilingual

Hi there, re: this, Baahubali was apparently produced in both Telugu and Tamil. It's unclear why you removed Tamil. It was also decided a couple of years ago after a lengthy discussion that both languages should be reflected, so the removal isn't consistent with established consensus. Feel free to check the talk page archives if you're interested in the rationale. Regards and thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Baahubali 2: The Conclusion, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of highest-grossing Indian films. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diffs: 8 edits over 6 minutes, with no sources added. And I specifically waited 11 minutes after your last edit for you to add references, before leaving this note. Sources should be added when you make the changes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the reference in the content you restored? If you do this again, your privileges will be interrupted. The silent, substandard editing isn't working. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For these unsourced and silent changes. You can't change numerical values like this without providing new references, or clearly explaining how the data in the currently sourced article has changed. When in doubt, open a discussion on the article's talk page to explain in detail. Short-cut editing is not helpful, and let this be your clear warning that any further poor sourcing I see will result in significantly longer blocks. This is Wikipedia editing 101. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yamharsha5. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Agnyaathavaasi. Diff: [3] You've previously been warned, and blocked, for adding unsourced content. Your addition here borders between personal interpretation and an accusation of plagiarism. Stop adding unsourced content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added my own article not done by plagarism

I added Agyathavasi content by from own knowledge not copied/plagarism extracted from other source. Yamharsha5 (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bigg Boss Telugu 2, you may be blocked from editing. Joshq.JQ 18:40, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Puvisha Manoharan. — Smjg (talk) 10:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yamharsha5. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography tables

Rowspans should not be used in filmography tables. Films not yet in production shouldn't be listed either. Please don't go against this. --Kailash29792 (talk) 12:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nayanthara filmography. Dl2000 (talk) 02:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Puvisha Manoharan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Puvisha Manoharan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puvisha Manoharan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pratyusha Support

The article Pratyusha Support has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blazin777 (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]